Dataset Information

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers complicated by Leriche syndrome: A report of three cases.

ABSTRACT: Leriche syndrome is a disease of aortoiliac occlusion, which causes diminished femoral pulses, impotence and claudication. As blood flow to the rectum is also decreased in Leriche syndrome, reconstruction with anastomosis may be complicated by ischemia when performing rectal cancer surgery. The inferior epigastric arteries often provide collateral circulation to the lower limbs in patients with Leriche syndrome, therefore, attention should be paid not to injure them during trocar insertion when performing laparoscopic surgeries. The present study is a report on three cases of patients with colorectal cancer who were successfully treated with laparoscopic surgeries. The first case was of a 71-year-old man with rectal cancer. A preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan revealed occlusion of the aorta below the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery. The blood flow to the lower limbs was supplied through collateral arteries, including the inferior epigastric arteries and the deep circumflex iliac arteries. A laparoscopic Hartmann's operation was performed successfully following marking of the inferior epigastric arteries using ultrasonography to avoid damaging them during trocar insertion. The second case involved a 70-year-old man with three colorectal cancers of the transverse and sigmoid colon and rectum. A CT scan revealed occlusion of the aorta below the origin of the renal arteries. Laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection and left hemicolectomy with colostomy were performed. The final patient was a 61-year-old man with rectal cancer. As the right internal iliac artery was patent, the patient underwent laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection. All the patients were discharged from the hospital without complications. It is important to visualize the image the blood flow via CT angiography and to mark collateral arteries using ultrasonography preoperatively in patients with Leriche syndrome for whom laparoscopic surgery was planned for to treat colorectal cancer.

SUBMITTER: Murono K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5530085 | biostudies-other | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fast-track surgery (FTS), a multimodal rehabilitation technique, has been recommended as surgical therapy for colorectal cancer. The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of FTS and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study was a blinded randomized trial. A total of 70 patients with colorectal cancer were divided into two groups and underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection. The FTS group consisted of 31 patients and the control group consisted of 39 patients. Protocols for the treatment of the FTS group included skipping pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation, early restoration of diet and early post-operative ambulation. Outcome measures, length of hospital stay, post-operative surgical stress response [C-reactive protein (CRP)] and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups. The average length of total hospital stay for the FTS and the control groups was 5.9±0.8 and 10.9±1.3 days, respectively (P<0.05), and the length of post-operative hospital stay for the FTS and control group was 4.3±0.8 and 8.0±1.1 days, respectively. (P<0.05) First flatus time for the FTS and control groups was 1.6±0.8 and 2.5±0.9 days, respectively (P<0.05). Defecation time for the FTS and control groups was 2.2±0.7 and 4.5±0.7 days, respectively (P<0.05). The time to restoration of a solid diet also showed a significant difference between the FTS and control groups (1.1±0.3 vs. 3.6±0.9 days; P<0.05). Following surgery, due to post-operative surgical stress, the two groups CRP levels increased significantly, but the levels of the FTS group were lower than those of the conventional control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in post-operative complications between the FTS and control groups. This study confirms that FTS shortens hospital stay and accelerates the recovery of bowel function without increase of post-operative complications. FTS is safe, improves post-operative recovery and is a better option than conventional laparoscopic surgery for treating colorectal cancer patients.

Project description:ImportanceSurgery represents the mainstay treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Indications for the laparoscopic approach in this setting have been widened and there is a need to confirm the benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in patients with complex disease states.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open surgery for liver metastases from colorectal cancer, focusing on the characteristics of modern MILS and therefore overcoming possible selection bias related to different policies for patients' eligibility for MILS over time.Design, setting, and participantsA cohort study of 885 resections performed for liver metastases from colorectal cancer between January 1, 2004, and June 30, 2017, at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit of San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy, comprising 187 laparoscopic and 698 open resections. Procedures performed using the MILS approach with a ratio of MILS to total resections per year of more than 30% were considered and were matched by propensity scores (ratio of 1:4) to procedures performed using the open approach with a ratio of MILS to total resections per year of less than 30%.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was short-term outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, functional recovery, and interval between surgery and adjuvant treatments; the secondary end point was long-term outcomes.ResultsAmong this cohort (104 patients in the MILS group; 46 women and 58 men; median age, 62 years [range, 35-81 years]; and 412 patients in the open group; 181 women and 231 men; median age, 60 years [range, 37-80 years]), primary end-point data showed a significantly higher incidence of postoperative morbidity in patients who underwent open resections compared with those who underwent MILS (94 [22.8%] vs 21 [20.2%]; P = .04). Patients in the MILS group had fewer major complications (Dindo-Clavien grades III-V) compared with patients in the open group (Dindo-Clavien grades III-V; 7 [6.7%] vs 35 [8.5%]; P = .03) as well as shorter lengths of stay (median [range] duration, 3 [2-35] vs 5 [4-37] days; P = .02). Oncologic results were not compromised by the laparoscopic approach.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, the results of the propensity score matching analysis between modern laparoscopic surgery and previous open surgery appear to confer more comparable cohorts for complexity, further supporting the advantages of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The increase in use that laparoscopy has experienced appears to be based on increased feasibility, widening of eligibility criteria for patients, enhanced clinical effectiveness, and oncologic outcomes. All these elements together suggest that up to 70% of patients appear to be candidates for this minimally invasive surgical approach in high-volume centers.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers complicated by Leriche syndrome: A report of three cases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets