Dataset Information

Clinical application value of 3.0T MR diffusion tensor imaging in grade diagnosis of gliomas.

ABSTRACT: The clinical value of MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in grade diagnosis of gliomas was investigated. A total of 31 patients with glioma were administered 3.0T MR convention and DTI examination, with quantitative measurement of anisotropy coefficient fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent dispersion coefficient (ADC) value, and the comparison of quantitative parameters of glioma between low- and high-grade, which was detected by Mann-Whitney U test. The receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to take the value of ADC and FA in tumor ROI as a critical point, to calculate the area under the curve and to confirm the diagnosis threshold value and evaluate its diagnostic efficiency. The FA value of 14 low-grade glioma cases was 139.4±81.3, with an ADC value of (1.36±0.21) ×10-3 mm2/sec. The FA value of 17 high-grade glioma cases was 103.1±41.5, with ADC value of (1.09±0.28)-3 mm2/sec; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The ADC value was taken as the critical point to judge tumor grade and draw the ROC curve; the area under the curve was 0.79. As the diagnosis threshold value, the ADC value of 1.11×10-3 mm2/sec was used to distinguish between low- and high-grade tumor with a sensitivity of 58.8% and specificity of 92.9%. The FA value was taken as a critical point to judge tumor grade and draw the ROC curve; the area under the curve was 0.62. As the diagnosis threshold value, the FA value of 178.9 was applied to distinguish between low- and high-grade tumor sensitivity of 94.1% and specificity of 35.7%. Therefore, the FA value and ADC value in DTI has an important estimated value for the pathological grade of glioma.

SUBMITTER: Shan W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5530196 | biostudies-other | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction Determining the full extent of gliomas during radiotherapy planning can be challenging with conventional T1 and T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to develop a method to automatically calculate differences in the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values in target volumes obtained with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) by comparing with values from anatomically homologous voxels on the contralateral side of the brain. Methods Seven patients with a histologically confirmed glioma underwent postoperative radiotherapy planning with 1.5 T MRI and computed tomography. DTI was acquired using echo planar imaging for 20 noncolinear directions with b = 1000 s/mm2 and one additional image with b = 0, repeated four times for signal averaging. The distribution of FA and MD was calculated in the gross tumor volume (GTV), shells 0-5 mm, 5-10 mm, 10-15 mm, 15-20 mm, and 20-25 mm outside the GTV, and the GTV mirrored in the left-right direction (mirGTV). All images were aligned to a template image, and FA and MD interhemispheric difference images were calculated. The difference in mean FA and MD between the regions of interest was statistically tested using two-sided paired t-tests with ? = 0.05. Results The mean FA in mirGTV was 0.20 ± 0.04, which was larger than the FA in the GTV (0.12 ± 0.03) and shells 0-5 mm (0.15 ± 0.03) and 5-10 mm (0.17 ± 0.03) outside the GTV. The mean MD (×10-3 mm2/s) in mirGTV was 0.93 ± 0.09, which was smaller than the MD in the GTV (1.48 ± 0.19) and the peritumoral shells. The distribution of FA and MD interhemispheric differences followed the same trends as FA and MD values. Conclusions This study successfully implemented a method for calculation of FA and MD differences by comparison of voxel values with anatomically homologous voxels on the contralateral side of the brain. Further research is warranted to determine if radiotherapy planning using these images can be used to improve target delineation.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Imaging-based tumor grading is highly desirable but faces challenges in sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. A recently proposed diffusion imaging method by using a fractional order calculus model offers a set of new parameters to probe not only the diffusion process itself but also intravoxel tissue structures, providing new opportunities for noninvasive tumor grading. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of using the fractional order calculus model to differentiate low- from high-grade gliomas in adult patients and illustrate its improved performance over a conventional diffusion imaging method using ADC (or D). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Fifty-four adult patients (18-70 years of age) with histology-proved gliomas were enrolled and divided into low-grade (n = 24) and high-grade (n = 30) groups. Multi-b-value diffusion MR imaging was performed with 17 b-values (0-4000 s/mm(2)) and was analyzed by using a fractional order calculus model. Mean values and SDs of 3 fractional order calculus parameters (D, ?, and ?) were calculated from the normal contralateral thalamus (as a control) and the tumors, respectively. On the basis of these values, the low- and high-grade glioma groups were compared by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the performance of individual parameters and the combination of multiple parameters for low- versus high-grade differentiation. RESULTS:Each of the 3 fractional order calculus parameters exhibited a statistically higher value (P ? .011) in the low-grade than in the high-grade gliomas, whereas there was no difference in the normal contralateral thalamus (P ? .706). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that ? (area under the curve = 0.853) produced a higher area under the curve than D (0.781) or ? (0.703) and offered a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 76.7%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.1%. CONCLUSIONS:The study demonstrated the feasibility of using a non-Gaussian fractional order calculus diffusion model to differentiate low- and high-grade gliomas. While all 3 fractional order calculus parameters showed statistically significant differences between the 2 groups, ? exhibited a better performance than the other 2 parameters, including ADC (or D).

Project description:PurposeTo quantitatively compare the potential of various diffusion parameters obtained from monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted imaging models and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the grading of gliomas.Materials and methodsThis study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Both diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging were performed in 69 patients with pathologically proven gliomas by using a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. An isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true ADC, pseudo-ADC, and perfusion fraction were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a biexponential model. A water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and distributed diffusion coefficient were calculated from diffusion-weighted images by using a stretched exponential model. Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and mean kurtosis were calculated from diffusion kurtosis images. All values were compared between high-grade and low-grade gliomas by using a Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for statistical evaluations.ResultsADC, true ADC, perfusion fraction, water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index, distributed diffusion coefficient, and mean diffusivity values were significantly lower in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 109, 56, 129, 6, 206, and 229, respectively; P < .05). Pseudo-ADC and mean kurtosis values were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (U = 98 and 8, respectively; P < .05). Both water molecular diffusion heterogeneity index (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.993) and mean kurtosis (AUC = 0.991) had significantly greater AUC values than ADC (AUC = 0.866), mean diffusivity (AUC = 0.722), and fractional anisotropy (AUC = 0.500) in the differentiation of low-grade and high-grade gliomas (P < .05).ConclusionWater molecular diffusion heterogeneity index and mean kurtosis values may provide additional information and improve the grading of gliomas compared with conventional diffusion parameters.

Dataset Information

Clinical application value of 3.0T MR diffusion tensor imaging in grade diagnosis of gliomas.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets