Dataset Information

A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator.

ABSTRACT: The supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks have a similar distribution of anaesthesia, and both can be used effectively for surgeries of the upper limb. This study aimed to compare the supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches of brachial plexus blocks, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation.Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective upper limb surgery of the elbow and/or below were randomly divided into two groups: infraclavicular Group (I) and supraclavicular Group (S). All the blocks were performed with the aid of ultrasound-guided nerve stimulator confirmation. The two groups were compared with respect to block performance time, onset of sensory and motor blockade, readiness for surgery, success rate and complications. The statistical analysis was performed with Student t-test and Chi-square test.The block performance time for the infraclavicular group was 9.57 ± 3.19 min, whereas for supraclavicular group, it was 11.53 ± 2.90 min with similar success rates (93.3%). Onset of sensory blockade was achieved earlier (6.43 ± 2.61 min) in Group I than Group S (8.45 ± 2.87 min, P = 0.006). The onset of motor blockade was similar in Group I (7.32 ± 2.90 min) and Group S (8.68 ± 3.50 min, P = 0.121). The patient satisfaction was similar in both the groups. One patient had a pneumothorax, three patients developed Horner syndrome and another had clinically symptomatic diaphragmatic paresis in Group S.The infraclavicular block is more rapidly executed compared to supraclavicular block with similar success rates and fewer complications in the presence of ultrasound and nerve stimulator and hence should be preferred.

SUBMITTER: Abhinaya RJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5530744 | biostudies-other | 2017 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Regional anaesthesia for upper limb surgery is routinely performed with brachial plexus blocks. A retroclavicular brachial plexus block has recently been described, but has not been adequately compared with another approach. This randomised controlled single-blinded trial tested the hypothesis that the retroclavicular approach, when compared with the supraclavicular approach, would increase the success rate. METHODS:One hundred and twenty ASA physical status 1-3 patients undergoing distal upper limb surgery were randomised to receive an ultrasound-guided retroclavicular or supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 30 mL of a 1:1 mixture of mepivacaine 1% and ropivacaine 0.5%, using a single-injection technique without needle tip repositioning. The primary outcome was block success rate 30 min after local anaesthetic injection, defined as a composite score of 14 of 16 points, inclusive of sensory and motor components. Secondary outcomes included needling time, time to first opioid request, oxycodone consumption, and pain scores (numeric rating scale, 0-10) at 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS:Success rates were 98.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 90.8%, 99.9%] and 98.3% [95% CI: 90.9%, 99.9%] in the supraclavicular and retroclavicular groups, respectively (P=0.99). The mean needling time was reduced in the supraclavicular group [supraclavicular: 5.0 (95% CI: 4.7, 5.4) min; retroclavicular: 6.0 (95% CI: 5.4, 6.6) min; P=0.006]. The mean time to first opioid request was similar between groups [supraclavicular: 439 (95% CI: 399, 479) min; retroclavicular: 447 (95% CI: 397, 498) min; P=0.19] as were oxycodone consumption [supraclavicular: 10.0 (95% CI: 6.5, 13.5 mg; retroclavicular: 7.9 (95% CI: 4.8, 11.0) mg; P=0.80] and pain scores at 24 h postoperatively [supraclavicular: 1.2 (95% CI: 2.1, 2.7); retroclavicular: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.6, 2.4); P=0.09]. CONCLUSIONS:Ultrasound-guided retroclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks share identical success rates, while providing similar pain relief. Reduced needling time in the supraclavicular approach is not clinically relevant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:NCT02641613.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that ultrasound (US)-guided technique of the supra- and infraclavicular and axillary approaches of brachial plexus block (BPB) will produce a high quality of surgical anesthesia for operations below the shoulder independently of the approach and body mass index (BMI). Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves will be blocked separately because they are not a part of the brachial plexus. METHODS:This is a prospective randomized observer-blinded study. The three approaches of the US-guided BPB without neurostimulation were compared for quality, performance time, and correlation between performance time and BMI. Intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerve blocks were used in all patients. RESULTS:A total of 101 patients were randomized into three groups: SCL (supraclavicular), ICL (infraclavicular), and AX (axillary). Seven patients were excluded due to various factors. All three groups were similar in demographic data, M:F proportion, preoperative diagnosis and type of surgery, anesthesiologists who performed the block, and surgical staff that performed the surgical intervention. The time between the end of the block performance and the start of the operation was also similar. The quality of the surgical anesthesia and discomfort during the operation were identical following comparison between groups. No direct positive correlation was observed between BMI and the block performance time. The time for the axillary block was slightly longer than the time for the supra- and infraclavicular approaches, but it had no practical clinical significance. Transient Horner syndrome was observed in three patients in the SCL group. No other adverse effects or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS:All three approaches can be used for US-guided BPB with similar quality of surgical anesthesia for operations of below the shoulder. A block of the intercostobrachial and medial brachial cutaneous nerves is recommended. Obesity is not a significant factor in relation to the time of US-guided BPB performance, or the quality of surgical anesthesia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01442558.).

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies of factors associated with prolonged duration of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block have included multiple surgical procedures or multiple anesthetic approaches, all of which are important confounders, and there is no study based on a single method of anesthesia exploring the factors affecting the resolution of brachial plexus block during upper limb surgery, especially in Asians. This study aimed to identify the risk factors affecting the prolonged duration of US-guided brachial plexus block in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II grade patients to improve postoperative analgesia.MethodsThis study enrolled patients scheduled to undergo surgery for upper limb fracture in Anting Hospital, Shanghai from May 2021 to September 2021. Inclusion criteria: (I) patients aged 18 years and above; (II) ASA I-II grade patients; (III) success of US-guided brachial plexus block. Based on the median duration of brachial plexus block, patients were divided into a <5-hour group and a ≥5-hour group. The factors were selected base on previous studies conclution and clinical demographic characteristics of patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate relevant influencing factors.ResultsA total of 129 patients (51.2% males; 51.01±16.54 years old) were analyzed. The duration of brachial plexus block was 2-12 hours, with a median duration of 5.09 hours. Multivariable analysis suggested that age 40-49 years [odds ratio (OR): 4.841; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.033 to 22.695; P=0.045], 50-59 years (OR: 4.730, 95% CI: 1.149 to 19.474; P=0.031), 60 years (OR: 8.540; 95% CI: 1.605 to 45.449; P=0.012), gender (OR: 3.314; 95% CI: 1.330 to 8.257; P=0.010), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; OR: 5.817, 95% CI: 1.509 to 22.472; P=0.011), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 (OR: 22.700; 95% CI: 1.994 to 198.386; P=0.012) were the risk factors for the duration of brachial plexus block.ConclusionsIt is advisable to use the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time when using ropivacaine in upper limb fracture surgery patients with elevated ALT (≥40 U/L) and lower GFR (<60 mL/min) in male patients aged ≥60 years.

Project description:BackgroundThe ultrasound-guided retroclavicular block (RCB) is a recently described alternative approach to brachial plexus blockade at the level of the cords. Although more distal blockade of the brachial plexus is thought to be associated with a lower incidence of phrenic nerve block, the impact of RCB on ipsilateral diaphragmatic function has not been formally investigated.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of supraclavicular and retroclavicular brachial plexus block on diaphragmatic function.SettingA single tertiary hospital, study period from December 2017 to May 2019.DesignDouble-blinded, randomised study.PatientsA total of 40 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery below the axilla. Exclusion criteria included significant pulmonary disease, BMI more than 40 and contra-indication to peripheral nerve block.InterventionsPatients were randomised to supraclavicular or retroclavicular brachial plexus block with ropivacaine 0.5%.Outcome measuresPhrenic block was assessed by measuring changes in diaphragmatic excursion using M-mode ultrasound, and maximum inspiratory volume on incentive spirometry from baseline, at 15 and 30 min postblock, and postoperatively. Comparative assessment of block characteristics included timing and distribution of sensory and motor block onset in the upper extremity, and scanning and block performance times.ResultsThe incidence of phrenic block in the supraclavicular group was higher by ultrasound imaging (70 vs. 15%) and also by pulmonary function testing (55 vs. 5%), with both diaphragmatic excursion and maximum inspiratory volume decreasing to a greater extent after supraclavicular block (SCB) compared with RCB at 15, 30 min and postoperative time points (repeated measures analysis of variance, P < 0.001). There was no difference in timing and extent of distal arm block, but suprascapular and axillary nerves were more consistently blocked after SCB than after RCB.ConclusionThe current study confirms the hypothesis that a RCB is significantly less likely to affect ipsilateral diaphragmatic function than a SCB.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02631122.

Dataset Information

A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets