A functional generalized method of moments approach for longitudinal studies with missing responses and covariate measurement error.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yi GY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5541954 | biostudies-other | 2012
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:Differential expression analysis of scRNA-seq data is central for characterizing how experimental factors affect the distribution of gene expression. However, distinguishing between biological and technical sources of cell-cell variability and assessing the statistical significance of quantitative comparisons between cell groups remains challenging. Here, we introduce memento, a tool designed to address these limitations by providing statistically robust and computationally efficient differential expression analysis of the mean, variability, and gene correlation from scRNA-seq. We applied memento to analyze 70,000 tracheal epithelial cells to identify interferon response genes with distinct variability and correlation patterns, 160,000 T cells perturbed with CRISPR-Cas9 to reconstruct gene-regulatory networks that control T cell activation, 1.2 million PMBCs to map cell-type-specific cis expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and arbitrary cell groups within the entire 50 million cell CELLxGENE Discover data corpus. In all cases, memento identified more significant and reproducible differences in mean expression but also identified differences in variability and gene correlation that suggest distinct transcriptional regulation mechanisms imparted by cytokines, genetic perturbations, and natural genetic variation. These results demonstrate that memento is a first-in-class method for the quantitative analysis of scRNA-seq data, scalable to millions of cells and thousands of samples.
2024-10-24 | GSE274751 | GEO
Project description:Spatial data have become increasingly common in epidemiology and public health research thanks to advances in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) technology. In health research, for example, it is common for epidemiologists to incorporate geographically indexed data into their studies. In practice, however, the spatially defined covariates are often measured with error. Naive estimators of regression coefficients are attenuated if measurement error is ignored. Moreover, the classical measurement error theory is inapplicable in the context of spatial modeling because of the presence of spatial correlation among the observations. We propose a semiparametric regression approach to obtain bias-corrected estimates of regression parameters and derive their large sample properties. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate using data on Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD). Both simulation and practical application demonstrate that the proposed method can be effective in practice.
| S-EPMC4956600 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We consider measurement error problem in the Cox model, where the underlying association between the true exposure and its surrogate is unknown, but can be estimated from a validation study. Under this framework, one can accommodate general distributional structures for the error-prone covariates, not restricted to a linear additive measurement error model or Gaussian measurement error. The proposed copula-based approach enables us to fit flexible measurement error models, and to be applicable with an internal or external validation study. Large sample properties are derived and finite sample properties are investigated through extensive simulation studies. The methods are applied to a study of physical activity in relation to breast cancer mortality in the Nurses' Health Study.
| S-EPMC4466084 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The generalized method of moments (GMM) is a very popular estimation and inference procedure based on moment conditions. When likelihood-based methods are difficult to implement, one can often derive various moment conditions and construct the GMM objective function. However, minimization of the objective function in the GMM may be challenging, especially over a large parameter space. Due to the special structure of the GMM, we propose a new sampling-based algorithm, the stochastic GMM sampler, which replaces the multivariate minimization problem by a series of conditional sampling procedures. We develop the theoretical properties of the proposed iterative Monte Carlo method, and demonstrate its superior performance over other GMM estimation procedures in simulation studies. As an illustration, we apply the stochastic GMM sampler to a Medfly life longevity study. Supplemental materials for the article are available online.
| S-EPMC3286612 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Propensity score methods are an important tool to help reduce confounding in non-experimental studies and produce more accurate causal effect estimates. Most propensity score methods assume that covariates are measured without error. However, covariates are often measured with error. Recent work has shown that ignoring such error could lead to bias in treatment effect estimates. In this paper, we consider an additional complication: that of differential measurement error across treatment groups, such as can occur if a covariate is measured differently in the treatment and control groups. We propose two flexible Bayesian approaches for handling differential measurement error when estimating average causal effects using propensity score methods. We consider three scenarios: systematic (i.e., a location shift), heteroscedastic (i.e., different variances), and mixed (both systematic and heteroscedastic) measurement errors. We also explore various prior choices (i.e., weakly informative or point mass) on the sensitivity parameters related to the differential measurement error. We present results from simulation studies evaluating the performance of the proposed methods and apply these approaches to an example estimating the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent drug use disorders.
| S-EPMC5391318 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Intensive longitudinal data collected with ecological momentary assessment methods capture information on participants' behaviors, feelings, and environment in near real-time. While these methods can reduce recall biases typically present in survey data, they may still suffer from other biases commonly found in self-reported data (e.g., measurement error and social desirability bias). To accommodate potential biases, we develop a Bayesian hidden Markov model to simultaneously identify risk factors for subjects transitioning between discrete latent states as well as risk factors potentially associated with them misreporting their true behaviors. We use simulated data to demonstrate how ignoring potential measurement error can negatively affect variable selection performance and estimation accuracy. We apply our proposed model to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment data collected within a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the impact of incentivizing abstinence from cigarette smoking among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
| S-EPMC9207158 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In the development of risk prediction models, predictors are often measured with error. In this paper, we investigate the impact of covariate measurement error on risk prediction. We compare the prediction performance using a costly variable measured without error, along with error-free covariates, to that of a model based on an inexpensive surrogate along with the error-free covariates. We consider continuous error-prone covariates with homoscedastic and heteroscedastic errors, and also a discrete misclassified covariate. Prediction performance is evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the Brier score (BS), and the ratio of the observed to the expected number of events (calibration). In an extensive numerical study, we show that (i) the prediction model with the error-prone covariate is very well calibrated, even when it is mis-specified; (ii) using the error-prone covariate instead of the true covariate can reduce the AUC and increase the BS dramatically; (iii) adding an auxiliary variable, which is correlated with the error-prone covariate but conditionally independent of the outcome given all covariates in the true model, can improve the AUC and BS substantially. We conclude that reducing measurement error in covariates will improve the ensuing risk prediction, unless the association between the error-free and error-prone covariates is very high. Finally, we demonstrate how a validation study can be used to assess the effect of mismeasured covariates on risk prediction. These concepts are illustrated in a breast cancer risk prediction model developed in the Nurses' Health Study.
| S-EPMC4480422 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Method of moments approach for generalized differential gene expression analysis (Perturb-seq)
| PRJNA1147758 | ENA
Project description:The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is a statistical method for the analysis of samples from random processes. First developed for the analysis of econometric data, the method is here formulated to extract hidden kinetic parameters from measurements of single molecule dwell times. Our method is based on the analysis of cumulants of the measured dwell times. We develop a general form of an objective function whose minimization can return estimates of decay parameters for any number of intermediates directly from the data. We test the performance of our technique using both simulated and experimental data. We also compare the performance of our method to nonlinear least-squares minimization (NL-LSQM), a commonly-used technique for analysis of single molecule dwell times. Our findings indicate that the GMM performs comparably to NL-LSQM over most of the parameter range we explore. It offers some benefits compared with NL-LSQM in that it does not require binning, exhibits slightly lower bias and variance with small sample sizes (N<20), and is somewhat superior in identifying fast decay times with these same low count data sets. Additionally, a comparison with the Classical Method of Moments (CMM) shows that the CMM can fail in many cases, whereas the GMM always returns estimates. Our results show that the GMM can be a useful tool and complements standard approaches to analysis of single molecule dwell times.
| S-EPMC6324800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Measurement error in exposure variables is a serious impediment in epidemiological studies that relate exposures to health outcomes. In nutritional studies, interest could be in the association between long-term dietary intake and disease occurrence. Long-term intake is usually assessed with food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), which is prone to recall bias. Measurement error in FFQ-reported intakes leads to bias in parameter estimate that quantifies the association. To adjust for bias in the association, a calibration study is required to obtain unbiased intake measurements using a short-term instrument such as 24-hour recall (24HR). The 24HR intakes are used as response in regression calibration to adjust for bias in the association. For foods not consumed daily, 24HR-reported intakes are usually characterized by excess zeroes, right skewness, and heteroscedasticity posing serious challenge in regression calibration modeling. We proposed a zero-augmented calibration model to adjust for measurement error in reported intake, while handling excess zeroes, skewness, and heteroscedasticity simultaneously without transforming 24HR intake values. We compared the proposed calibration method with the standard method and with methods that ignore measurement error by estimating long-term intake with 24HR and FFQ-reported intakes. The comparison was done in real and simulated datasets. With the 24HR, the mean increase in mercury level per ounce fish intake was about 0.4; with the FFQ intake, the increase was about 1.2. With both calibration methods, the mean increase was about 2.0. Similar trend was observed in the simulation study. In conclusion, the proposed calibration method performs at least as good as the standard method.
| S-EPMC5612494 | biostudies-literature