ACDF Graft Selection by Surgeons: Survey of AOSpine Members.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yoon ST
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5544153 | biostudies-other | 2017 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:The plastic surgery literature is devoid of research on the topic of professional development tools that may be used to enhance performance as a plastic surgeon. After an extensive review of the medical literature, we selected the most frequently referenced professional development tools utilized by plastic surgeons, which included the following: goal setting, positive visualization, scheduled practice, critically analyzing mistakes, professional development conferences, involvement in sports, motivational videos, podcasts & audiobooks, daily morning routines, self-development books, and advice from mentors.MethodsA 10-question survey was sent to 2542 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). The algorithm used to select ASPS members to survey was based on member demographics that would best reflect the views of the entire active society membership. Responses were compared based on demographic factors such as type of practice, gender, and age.ResultsA total of 286/2542 (11.25%) ASPS members participated in the survey. Analyzing mistakes (96.3%), goal setting (88.51%), and advice from mentors (85.2%) were most commonly attributed to self-development. Respondents in an academic practice favored conferences and advice from mentors. Participants in a solo practice favored self-help books and morning routines. No statistical differences were observed based on training background.ConclusionsASPS members attribute their professional development to setting measurable goals, carefully analyzing surgical mistakes, and guidance from mentors. This information opens the door for continued analysis of professional development within plastic surgery as well as supplement training practices at the resident and post-graduate level.
| S-EPMC8143750 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has recently gained increasing popularity, but there are limited data regarding national trends in the use of this technique. Our aim was to determine practice patterns related to prepectoral breast reconstruction among plastic surgeons, as well as to identify perceived advantages and disadvantages of this technique.MethodsA 16-question electronic survey tool was distributed to 2535 members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Survey items focused on surgeon practices related to prepectoral reconstruction, in addition to their motivations for and concerns with performing the procedure.ResultsA total of 274 responses were received (10.8% response rate). Nearly half of respondents (48.4%) reported using prepectoral techniques in all or most of their procedures. Decreased animation deformity was identified as the most significant advantage by 76.3% of respondents. Increased rippling and potential wound healing complications were identified as the most significant disadvantages to the procedure by 49.1% and 40.4% of respondents, respectively. The majority of surgeons reported using acellular dermal matrices in their procedures, with most surgeons demonstrating preferences for cohesive and shaped devices.ConclusionsPrepectoral breast reconstruction is being widely adopted by plastic surgeons, with the majority of surgeons in our sample using prepectoral techniques in their practices. Responses demonstrate that this technique offers several perceived advantages, most notably the avoidance of animation deformity. However, our data also highlight that there are still many unanswered questions in the community about the complication profile and technical aspects of prepectoral techniques that warrant further investigation.
| S-EPMC7489685 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in the general population and among health care providers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CRC screening practices of general surgeons who provide specialized diagnostic testing and CRC treatment and to examine the CRC screening behaviors of their first-degree family members.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among general surgeons who attended the 21st National Surgical Congress in Turkey held from April 11th to 15th, 2018. The survey included items on demographics, screening-related attitude, CRC screening options, barriers to CRC screening, and surgeons' annual volumes of CRC cases.ResultsA total of 530 respondents completed the survey. Almost one-third of the responding surgeons (29.4%, n?=?156) were aged over 50?years, among whom approximately half (47.1%, n?=?74) reported having undergone CRC screening and preferring a colonoscopy as the screening modality (78.4%). Among general surgeons aged 50?years and older, high-volume surgeons (?25 CRC cases per year) were more likely to undergo screening compared with low-volume surgeons (<?25 CRC cases per year). The respondents aged below 50?years reported that 56.1% (n?=?210) of their first-degree relatives were up-to-date with CRC screening, mostly with colonoscopy. Compared to low-volume surgeons aged below 50?years, high-volume surgeons' first-degree relatives were more likely to be up-to-date with CRC screening.ConclusionThe survey results demonstrated that routine screening for CRC among surgeons and/or their first-degree relatives is currently not performed at the desired level. However, high-volume surgeons are more likely to participate in routine screening.
| S-EPMC6852782 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMeniscus repair is a challenging task in knee arthroscopy. Currently, there are a variety of arthroscopic methods available for meniscus repair. The purpose of this study was to determine a consensus in meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists.MethodsA total of 205 registered orthopaedic surgeons participated in the surveys. The survey consisted of 35 questions regarding general arthroscopy and postoperative management, including physicians' level of expertise, anaesthesia, postoperative treatment, rehabilitation and procedures performed. Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases) on aspects of patient care.ResultsThe most important finding of this study was the agreement among almost all aspects of the knee arthroscopy approach. Consensus among Polish surgeons was noticed in choosing regional anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy, the lack of need for knee braces and knee medications, the of use of LMW heparin for thromboprophylaxis, 1-2 days of hospitalization, the recommendation of rehabilitation and the use of magnetic resonance as a diagnostic test for meniscus damage. Surgical expertise was significantly associated with the performance of meniscus suture procedures (p = 0.009). Experts recommended starting rehabilitation on the day of surgery (p = 0.007) and were more likely to use objective physical tests (p = 0.003). Non-expert surgeons recommended a longer period from meniscus suture to full-range knee motion (p = 0.001) and admitted that patient age does matter for meniscus repair qualification (p = 0.002).ConclusionsThere is consensus among almost all issues of meniscus tear treatment in the environment of Polish orthopaedists; however, the issues of rehabilitation and the use of advanced meniscus repair techniques are associated with surgical expertise.
| S-EPMC7513306 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOn June 17, 2016, providing medical assistance in dying became legal in Canada. This controversial change has had reverberating implications for the entire medical community. This is especially true for physicians that regularly deal with end-of-life decisions, among them neurosurgical and orthopedic spine surgeons, whose patients suffer from a variety of debilitating conditions. With this study we sought to document the opinions of Canadian spine surgeons in hopes of better understanding the sentiment within the speciality towards this change and assess how it evolves over time.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was sent out to members of the Canadian Spine Society (CSS). The survey encompassed 21 questions pertaining to opinions and attitudes regarding MAID and different facets of the legislation.ResultsA total of 51 surgeons responded to the survey, comprised of a mix of orthopedic surgeons (68.6%), pediatric orthopedic surgeons (5.9%), and neurosurgeons (21.6%), practicing all across Canada. The majority support the patients' right to obtain MAID (62.8%) and the right of physicians to participate (82.4%). Most also support the right to conscientious objection (90.1%). The results were split on duty to refer patients for MAID (49.0%). Respondents were also divided on whether they could foresee themselves referring to a MAID service, with 37.2% responding yes. A small minority of respondents (3.9%) felt they could see themselves actively involved in MAID.ConclusionsAt the advent of legal MAID, the majority of members of the CSS supported both the right of patients to participate in MAID and the right of physicians to provide this service if they so choose, while still respecting the principle of conscientious objection. Of note, only a small minority were willing to be actively involved. This survey provides a useful baseline of opinions in this practice area and will be used to analyze changes over the next 10 years.
| S-EPMC8820034 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThere is widespread acknowledgement that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted surgical services. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) sent out a survey to assess what impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the practice of thoracic oncology surgery.MethodsAll ESTS members were invited (13-20 April 2020) to complete an online questionnaire of 26 questions, designed by the ESTS learning affairs committee.ResultsThe response rate was 23.0% and the completeness rate was 91.2%. The number of treated COVID-positive cases per hospital varied from fewer than 20 cases (30.6%) to more than 200 cases (22.7%) per hospital. Most hospitals (89.1%) postponed surgical procedures. All hospitals performed patient screening with a nasopharyngeal swab, but only 6.7% routinely tested health care workers. A total of 20% of respondents reported that multidisciplinary meetings were completely cancelled and 66%, that multidisciplinary decisions were not different from normal practice. Trends were recognized in prioritizing surgical patients based on age (younger than 70), type of surgery (lobectomy or less), size of tumour (T1-2) and lymph node involvement (N1). Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that surgeons were involved in daily care of COVID-19-positive patients. Fifty-three percent mentioned that full personal protective equipment was available to them when treating a COVID-19-positive patient.ConclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has created issues for the safety of health care workers, and surgeons have been forced to change their routine practice. However, there was no consensus about surgical priorities in lung cancer patients, demonstrating the need for the production of specific guidelines.
| S-EPMC7499623 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cardiothoracic surgeons are frequently confronted with complex ethical issues. Educational efforts to help surgeons navigate such issues have been undertaken in recent years, but their effectiveness is uncertain.A survey instrument exploring the effects of ethics educational sessions at annual meetings and publications in cardiothoracic surgery journals was sent electronically to cardiothoracic surgeons who belong to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.Of 3,705 surgeons, 578 responded (15.6%). The majority of respondents practice in an academic setting (55%), attended at least two of the last five Society annual meetings (66%), and at least one of the last five Association annual meetings (68%). A majority of respondents agreed that their own practices would be improved (69%) and that cardiothoracic surgeons in general would benefit (83%) from better understanding of ethical issues. Respondents also believed that demonstration of an adequate understanding of ethical issues should be part of both American Board of Thoracic Surgery certification and maintenance of certification processes (61% and 60%, respectively). Among respondents who attended ethics presentations at annual meetings, only 4% believed that the sessions did not improve their understanding of complex ethical issues, and only 10% believed that the sessions did not affect their surgical practices.The survey suggested that efforts toward ethics education for cardiothoracic surgeons might be both relevant and important; the results encourage continuation and further improvement of such efforts.
| S-EPMC4481736 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Indication for intervention in Dupuytren disease is influenced by many factors, including location and extent of disease, surgeon preference, and comfort level with different treatment techniques. The aim of this study was to determine current Dupuytren disease management trends. Methods: A questionnaire was sent through the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to all members. In addition to demographic data, questions focused on indications for different procedural interventions based on location of disease, age, and activity level of the patient. Results: Approximately 24% of respondents completed the survey. Respondents were mostly orthopedic surgeons in private practice who do not work with residents or fellows. Respondents preferred collagenase over needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy for primary Dupuytren disease involving only the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Limited fasciectomy was the preferred treatment for primary Dupuytren disease involving the MCP and proximal interphalangeal joints. For a patient amenable to any treatment option, the majority would use collagenase, although 87.1% felt that fasciectomy offered the longest disease-free interval. Furthermore, given the option of a young, working patient, 42.7% would use collagenase, while plastic and general surgeons were more likely to treat this patient with limited fasciectomy. More plastic surgeons (vs orthopedic) believe that limited fasciectomy yields the longest disease-free interval. For a patient amenable to any surgical option, orthopedic surgeons prefer collagenase, whereas plastic hand surgeons prefer a limited fasciectomy. Conclusion: There are several procedural options for the treatment of Dupuytren disease. This study details current practice patterns among hand surgeons and reveals the increasingly prevalent use of collagenase.
| S-EPMC6966290 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo assess our surgeons perceptive regarding the safe usage of electrosurgical devices.Methodology: This cross sectional survey was carried out at two hospitals, A cancer hospital and a public sector general hospital. Consultants, fellows and senior residents (Resident year 3rd and year 4th) on the surgical floor were requested to fill up the questionnaire. Calculations were performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 20) for Windows version 20 statistical software. Data was described using median with minimum and maximum value for quantitative variables. For categorical variables, number of observations and percentages were reported. The study is complied with hospital guidelines on research involving human subjects.ResultsOut of 80 questionnaires 52 were filled and returned. 12 consultants, 16 fellows/Senior registrars and 24 senior residents filled their questionnaires. For the sake of anonymity no information was obtained regarding the level of training and experience. Total 12 questions were asked. An expert level was set for a score above 10/12. A moderate level was set at 8/12. A score of less than 8 was considered unsafe for using electrosurgical devices. Only 6 (11.5%) participants had an expert level of understanding. 16 (30.7%) had moderate understanding. 30 (57.7%) were considered unsafe regarding use of electrosurgical devices. 85% participants were not aware of the correct mode of current to use for coagulating vessels. 69% of surgeons would use electrocautery to control staple line bleeds. 67% participants weren't aware of the correct placement of dispersive electrode. 60% couldn't identify a safe device for use in patients with a pacemaker. 46% of surgeons would cut a dispersive electrode to fit it on a child. 69% believed that harmonic scalpel was a bipolar cautery. 61% couldn't differentiate between RFA and Microwave Ablation. 63% didn't know how to handle an operating room fire.ConclusionIn these two hospitals, high level of ignorance noticed regarding the procedure and indications of basic electrosurgical equipment which needs raising awareness and further training.
| S-EPMC6953526 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires intense education and training with structured supervision and feedback. However, a standardized training structure is lacking in Germany. This nationwide survey aimed to assess the current state of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) training and factors impacting surgeons' satisfaction.MethodsBetween July and October 2021, an online survey was conducted among general, abdominal, and thoracic surgeons in Germany. The survey collected data on department size, individual operative experience, availability of MIS training equipment and curricula, and individual satisfaction with training. A linear regression analysis was conducted to investigate factors influencing the surgeons' satisfaction with the MIS training.ResultsA total of 1008 surgeons participated in the survey, including residents (26.1%), fellows (14.6%), attendings (43.8%), and heads of departments (15.2%). Of the respondents, 57.4% reported having access to MIS training equipment, 29.8% and 26% had a curriculum for skills lab MIS training and intraoperative MIS training, respectively. In multivariate linear regression analysis, strongest predictors for surgeons' satisfaction with skills lab MIS training and intraoperative training were the availability of respective training curricula (skills lab: β 12.572; p < 0.001 & intraoperative: β 16.541; p < 0.001), and equipment (β 5.246; p = 0.012 & β 4.295; p = 0.037), and experience as a first surgeon in laparoscopy (β 12.572; p < 0.001 & β 3.748; p = 0.007). Additionally, trainees and teachers differed in their satisfaction factors.ConclusionGermany lacks standardized training curricula and sufficient access to MIS training equipment. Trainees and teachers have distinct factors influencing their satisfaction with MIS training. Standardized curricula, equipment accessibility, and surgical experience are crucial for improving surgeons' satisfaction with training.
| S-EPMC10830590 | biostudies-literature