Functional lumen imaging probe: The FLIP side of esophageal disease.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Carlson DA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5555117 | biostudies-other | 2016 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10841715 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe functional lumen imaging probe (Endoflip™) is increasingly used for evaluation of patients with esophageal symptoms. To improve the interpretation of Endoflip™ in clinical practice, normative values with appropriate cut-off values are required.MethodsOriginal clinical studies describing Endoflip™ use for measurements of esophageal motility in healthy adults were considered. Meta-analysis was performed based on published values.ResultsA total of 17 articles were included in the systematic review, 15 of which were included in the meta-analysis, representing 154 unique subjects. At 40 ml distention, the 5th-95th and 10th-90th percentiles for esophagogastric junction distensibility index (EGJ-DI) were 1.96-10.95 mm2 /mmHg and 2.36-8.95 mm2 /mmHg, respectively. An EGJ-DI below 2 mm2 /mmHg was found in 5.4%, and below 3 mm2 /mmHg in 20.1% of healthy subjects. At 50 ml distention, the 5th-95th and 10th-90th percentiles for EGJ-DI are 2.86-10.66 mm2 /mmHg and 3.28-9.12 mm2 /mmHg, respectively (below 2 mm2 /mmHg: 0.6%, 3 mm2 /mmHg: 6.3%). The 5th-95th and 10th-90th percentiles for EGJ-DI at 60 ml distention were 3.06-8.14 mm2 /mmHg and 3.33-7.18 mm2 /mmHg, respectively (below 2 mm2 /mmHg: 0.0%, 3 mm2 /mmHg: 7%). A clear cut-off for lower values was identified while a large spread in values was observed for upper limits of normal for EGJ-DI for all filling volumes.ConclusionsGiven these observations, we recommend using a cut-off of 2 mm2 /mmHg for clinical practice, values below can be considered abnormal. Given that 5.4% of the healthy subjects will have an EGJ-DI below 2 mm2 /mmHg at 40 ml, we recommend using the 50 and 60 ml distention volumes. The clinical use of an upper limit for normality of EGJ-DI seems questionable.
| S-EPMC9786273 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/aimsThe mechanism via which supra-esophageal symptoms are generated is unclear. We assessed upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function in novel fashion using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography. We hypothesize that symptoms related to aspiration of esophageal contents may be associated with a more distensible UES.MethodsFLIP and reflux symptom index score data from patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation for an esophageal complaint over a 10-month period were analyzed retrospectively. UES distensibility on FLIP was studied at 40-70 mL volumes with in-depth analysis at 50 and 60 mL. Symptoms were compared between patients with low, middle, and high UES-distensibility index (UES-DI). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine associations between the UES-DI and individual reflux symptom index symptom item scores.ResultsOne hundred and eleven subjects were included. Overall, the associations between UES-DI and symptoms that could be related to supra-esophageal aspiration were strongest at the 50 mL FLIP volume. Choking item score was highest in the high UES-DI group (2.8) vs 1.4 (P < 0.001) in the middle UES-DI and 1.1 (P = 0.004) in the low UES-DI groups. Similarly, the cough item score was highest in the high UES-DI group (2.7) vs 1.5 (P = 0.009) and 0.9 (P = 0.002) groups.ConclusionA higher UES-DI measures defective barrier function which could may be the main pathophysiology that generates supra-esophageal symptoms.
| S-EPMC9274470 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/aimsThis study aimed to develop a diagnostic tool using machine learning to apply functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry data to determine the probability of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction as determined using the Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0) and high-resolution manometry (HRM).MethodsFive hundred and fifty-seven adult patients that completed FLIP and HRM (with a conclusive CCv4.0 assessment of EGJ outflow) and 35 asymptomatic volunteers ("controls") were included. EGJ opening was evaluated with 16-cm FLIP performed during sedated endoscopy via EGJ-distensibility index and maximum EGJ diameter. HRM was classified according to the CCv4.0 as conclusive disorders of EGJ outflow or normal EGJ outflow (timed barium esophagram applied when required and available). The probability tool utilized Bayesian additive regression treesBART, which were evaluated using a leave-one-out approach and a holdout test set.ResultsPer HRM and CCv4.0, 243 patients had a conclusive disorder of EGJ outflow while 314 patients (and all 35 controls) had normal EGJ outflow. The model accuracy to predict EGJ obstruction (based on leave-one-out/holdout test set, respectively) was 89%/90%, with 87%/85% sensitivity, 92%/97% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95/0.97. A free, open-source tool to calculate probability for EGJ obstruction using FLIP metrics is available at https://www.wklytics.com/nmgi/prob_flip.html.ConclusionsApplication of FLIP metrics utilizing a probabilistic approach incorporates the diagnostic confidence (or uncertainty) into the clinical interpretation of EGJ obstruction. This tool can provide clinical decision support during application of FLIP Panometry for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.
| S-EPMC9577577 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background/aimsThe functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) device has been used to assess pyloric dysfunction in patients with gastroparesis. We aim to investigate whether varying FLIP catheter positions affect pyloric FLIP measurements.MethodsPatients undergoing endoscopy for chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) or gastroparesis were prospectively enrolled. FLIP balloon was adjusted for 3 positions within the pylorus: (1) proximal position, 75% of FLIP balloon in the duodenum and 25% in the antrum; (2) middle position, 50% in the duodenum and 50% in the antrum; and (3) distal position, 25% in the duodenum and 75% in the antrum. Pylorus cross-sectional area (CSA), intra-bag pressure (P), and distensibility indices (DI) were measured for 30, 40, and 50-mL balloon volumes. Fluoroscopic images were obtained to confirm FLIP balloon geometry. Data was analyzed separately using FLIP Analytic and customized MATLAB software.ResultsTwenty-two patients with CUNV (n = 4) and gastroparesis (n = 18) were enrolled. Pressures were significantly higher in the proximal position compared to the middle and distal positions. CSA measurements were significantly higher at the proximal and middle positions for 30-mL and 40-mL volume compared to the distal position values. DI values were significantly lower at the proximal positions for 40-mL and 50-mL distensions when compared to the middle and distal positions. Fluoroscopic images confirmed increased balloon bending when placed mostly in the duodenum.ConclusionsFLIP balloon position within the pylorus directly affects balloon geometry which significantly affects P, CSA, and DI measurements. Standardized pyloric FLIP protocols and balloon design adjustments are needed for the continued application of this technology to the pylorus.
| S-EPMC10083104 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Endoluminal functional lumen impedance planimetry (EndoFLIPTM) has become the gold standard to evaluate esophageal distensibility, although the study itself and its analysis present challenges. We propose here a new method to assess lower esophageal distension capacity that overcomes several limitations of prior approaches, including incomplete and corrupted EndoFLIPTM recordings. Esophageal distension capacity was evaluated with a 16-channel EndoFLIPTM in 10 controls and 14 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Controls were evaluated once. EoE patients were evaluated at baseline and after at least six weeks of treatment with orodispersible budesonide tablets, 1 mg bd. Balloon volumes were increased by 5 mL stepwise, either reaching a maximum volume of 60 mL or a maximum balloon pressure of 60 mmHg. Recordings were analyzed with a homemade R script. The mean esophageal diameter at 60 mL, D (60 mL), was calculated or extrapolated depending on whether the 60 mL volume was reached. By fitting a Michaelis-Menten curve across all measured diameters throughout all constant volume steps, the mean D (60 mL) was estimated. For control subjects, the mean ± SD value of D (60 mL) was 17.08 ± 1.69 mm, and for EoE patients at baseline, D (60 mL) was 14.51 ± 2.68 mm. After six weeks of treatment of EoE patients, D (60 mL) significantly increased to 16.22 ± 1.86 mm (paired Wilcoxon signed test: p = 0.0052), although the values for control subjects were not reached. The estimated mean esophageal diameter at 60 mL is a good proxy for esophageal distension capacity, which correlates with clinical outcomes in EoE. The method presented in this study overcomes difficulties encountered during the standard measurement protocol, allowing the analysis of recordings from incomplete and corrupted registries.
| S-EPMC10814586 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Video 1Aberrant placement of functional lumen imaging probe into mediastinum during peroral endoscopic myotomy.
| S-EPMC10577399 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:To compare the utility of the distensibility index (DI) on functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography to other esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics in assessing treatment response in achalasia in the context of esophageal anatomy. METHODS:We prospectively evaluated 79 patients (at ages 17-81 years; 47% female patients) with achalasia during follow-up after pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or per-oral endoscopic myotomy with timed barium esophagram, high-resolution impedance manometry, and FLIP. Anatomic deformities were identified based on consensus expert opinion. Patients were classified based on anatomy and EGJ opening to determine the association with radiographic outcome and Eckardt score (ES). RESULTS:Twenty-seven patients (34.1%) had an anatomic deformity-10 pseudodiverticula at myotomy, 7 epiphrenic diverticula, 5 sigmoid, and 5 sinktrap. A 5-minute column area of >5 cm was best associated with an ES of >3, with a sensitivity of 84% (P = 0.0013). Area under the curve for EGJ metrics in association with retention was as follows: DI, 0.90; maximal EGJ diameter, 0.76; integrated relaxation pressure, 0.64; and basal esophagogastric junction pressure, 0.53. Only FLIP metrics were associated with retention given normal anatomy (DI 2.4 vs 5.2 mm/mm Hg and maximal EGJ diameter 13.1 vs 16.6 mm in patients with and without retention, respectively; P values < 0.0001 and 0.002). Using a DI cutoff of <2.8 as abnormal, 40 of 45 patients with retention (P = 0.0001) and 23 of 25 patients with an ES of >3 (P = 0.02) had a low DI and/or anatomic deformity. With normal anatomy, 21 of 22 patients with retention had a low or borderline low DI. DISCUSSION:The FLIP DI is most useful metric for assessing the effect of achalasia treatment on EGJ opening. However, abnormal anatomy is an important mediator of outcome and treatment success will be modulated by anatomic defects that impede bolus emptying.
| S-EPMC6682473 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimFaecal incontinence (FI) subtypes (urge, passive, mixed) are linked to the physiopathological mechanism of FI. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a consistent relationship between FI subtype and anal sphincter dysfunction. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between anal sphincter function, assessed using the new EndoFLIP® technology, and FI subtype.MethodPatients referred for FI were prospectively enrolled between October 2015 and May 2021 in a registry, and data were retrospectively examined. Each patient underwent a clinical assessment as well as three-dimensional high-resolution or water-perfused anorectal manometry, anal EndoFLIP®, and anorectal electrophysiological and endoanal ultrasound tests. The results of the investigations were compared across FI subtypes.ResultsThe cohort included 133 patients, 54 (41%) of whom met the criteria for urge FI, 40 (30%) for passive FI and 39 (29%) for mixed FI. The resting anal distensibility index (DI) at 50 ml of distension was significantly lower in patients with urge FI than in patients with passive FI (p = 0.04). At rest, a DI at 50 ml of distension ≥7.3 mm2 mmHg-1 and a DI at 40 ml of distension <1.3 mm2 mmHg-1 were associated with the passive and urge FI subtypes, respectively, with poor discriminatory power (an accuracy of 0.49 compared with 0.33 for random assignment). There were no differences in anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound or electrophysiological test results among the urge, passive and mixed FI subgroups (all p > 0.05).ConclusionThe anal sphincter DI using the EndoFLIP® system displayed poor predictive performance in distinguishing among FI subtypes.
| S-EPMC9795963 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAchalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry (HRM) prognosticate treatment response and help direct management plan. We aimed to utilize parameters of distension-induced contractility and pressurization on functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and machine learning to predict HRM achalasia subtypes.MethodsOne hundred eighty adult patients with treatment-naïve achalasia defined by HRM per Chicago Classification (40 type I, 99 type II, 41 type III achalasia) who underwent FLIP panometry were included: 140 patients were used as the training cohort and 40 patients as the test cohort. FLIP panometry studies performed with 16-cm FLIP assemblies were retrospectively analyzed to assess distensive pressure and distension-induced esophageal contractility. Correlation analysis, single tree, and random forest were adopted to develop classification trees to identify achalasia subtypes.Key resultsIntra-balloon pressure at 60 mL fill volume, and proportions of patients with absent contractile response, repetitive retrograde contractile pattern, occluding contractions, sustained occluding contractions (SOC), contraction-associated pressure changes >10 mm Hg all differed between HRM achalasia subtypes and were used to build the decision tree-based classification model. The model identified spastic (type III) vs non-spastic (types I and II) achalasia with 90% and 78% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively. Achalasia subtypes I, II, and III were identified with 71% and 55% accuracy in the train and test cohorts, respectively.Conclusions and inferencesUsing a supervised machine learning process, a preliminary model was developed that distinguished type III achalasia from non-spastic achalasia with FLIP panometry. Further refinement of the measurements and more experience (data) may improve its ability for clinically relevant application.
| S-EPMC7775338 | biostudies-literature