Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Tests for equivalence of two survival functions: Alternative to the tests under proportional hazards.

ABSTRACT: For either the equivalence trial or the non-inferiority trial with survivor outcomes from two treatment groups, the most popular testing procedure is the extension (e.g., Wellek, A log-rank test for equivalence of two survivor functions, Biometrics, 1993; 49: 877-881) of log-rank based test under proportional hazards model. We show that the actual type I error rate for the popular procedure of Wellek is higher than the intended nominal rate when survival responses from two treatment arms satisfy the proportional odds survival model. When the true model is proportional odds survival model, we show that the hypothesis of equivalence of two survival functions can be formulated as a statistical hypothesis involving only the survival odds ratio parameter. We further show that our new equivalence test, formulation, and related procedures are applicable even in the presence of additional covariates beyond treatment arms, and the associated equivalence test procedures have correct type I error rates under the proportional hazards model as well as the proportional odds survival model. These results show that use of our test will be a safer statistical practice for equivalence trials of survival responses than the commonly used log-rank based tests.

SUBMITTER: Martinez EE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5557049 | biostudies-other | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Investigating non-inferiority or equivalence in time-to-event data under non-proportional hazards.

Project description:The classical approach to analyze time-to-event data, e.g. in clinical trials, is to fit Kaplan-Meier curves yielding the treatment effect as the hazard ratio between treatment groups. Afterwards, a log-rank test is commonly performed to investigate whether there is a difference in survival or, depending on additional covariates, a Cox proportional hazard model is used. However, in numerous trials these approaches fail due to the presence of non-proportional hazards, resulting in difficulties of interpreting the hazard ratio and a loss of power. When considering equivalence or non-inferiority trials, the commonly performed log-rank based tests are similarly affected by a violation of this assumption. Here we propose a parametric framework to assess equivalence or non-inferiority for survival data. We derive pointwise confidence bands for both, the hazard ratio and the difference of the survival curves. Further we propose a test procedure addressing non-inferiority and equivalence by directly comparing the survival functions at certain time points or over an entire range of time. Once the model's suitability is proven the method provides a noticeable power benefit, irrespectively of the shape of the hazard ratio. On the other hand, model selection should be carried out carefully as misspecification may cause type I error inflation in some situations. We investigate the robustness and demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methods by means of a simulation study. Finally, we demonstrate the validity of the methods by a clinical trial example.

| S-EPMC10258187 | biostudies-literature

Survival analysis-part 2: Cox proportional hazards model.

Project description:Learning objectives: 1. To understand the log-rank test and limitations of the log-rank test in comparing survival between groups. 2. To understand the fundamental concepts of the proportional hazards assumption. 3. To understand basic steps in the development of the Cox proportional hazards model and reported hazard ratios. 4. To understand how results of a Cox model run using STATA© (a commonly used proprietary statistical software) can be understood and interpreted.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-020-01108-7.

| S-EPMC7876211 | biostudies-literature

Latent Class Proportional Hazards Regression with Heterogeneous Survival Data.

Project description:Heterogeneous survival data are commonly present in chronic disease studies. Delineating meaningful disease subtypes directly linked to a survival outcome can generate useful scientific implications. In this work, we develop a latent class proportional hazards (PH) regression framework to address such an interest. We propose mixture proportional hazards modeling, which flexibly accommodates class-specific covariate effects while allowing for the baseline hazard function to vary across latent classes. Adapting the strategy of nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation, we derive an Expectation-Maximization (E-M) algorithm to estimate the proposed model. We establish the theoretical properties of the resulting estimators. Extensive simulation studies are conducted, demonstrating satisfactory finite-sample performance of the proposed method as well as the predictive benefit from accounting for the heterogeneity across latent classes. We further illustrate the practical utility of the proposed method through an application to a mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cohort in the Uniform Data Set.

| S-EPMC10786342 | biostudies-literature

Three measures of explained variation for correlated survival data under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model.

Project description:Measures of explained variation are useful in scientific research, as they quantify the amount of variation in an outcome variable of interest that is explained by one or more other variables. We develop such measures for correlated survival data, under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model. Because different approaches have been studied in the literature outside the classical linear regression model, we investigate three measures R(2) , Rres2, and ρ(2) that quantify three different population coefficients. We show that although the three population measures are not the same, they reflect similar amounts of variation explained by the predictors. Among the three measures, we show that R(2) , which is the simplest to compute, is also consistent for the first population measure under the usual asymptotic scenario when the number of clusters tends to infinity. The other two measures, on the other hand, all require that in addition the cluster sizes be large. We study the properties of the measures both analytically and through simulation studies. We illustrate their different usage on a multi-center clinical trial and a recurrent events data set. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

| S-EPMC5012918 | biostudies-literature

Survival analysis of DNA mutation motifs with penalized proportional hazards.

Project description:Antibodies, an essential part of our immune system, develop through an intricate process to bind a wide array of pathogens. This process involves randomly mutating DNA sequences encoding these antibodies to find variants with improved binding, though mutations are not distributed uniformly across sequence sites. Immunologists observe this nonuniformity to be consistent with "mutation motifs", which are short DNA subsequences that affect how likely a given site is to experience a mutation. Quantifying the effect of motifs on mutation rates is challenging: a large number of possible motifs makes this statistical problem high dimensional, while the unobserved history of the mutation process leads to a nontrivial missing data problem. We introduce an ℓ 1-penalized proportional hazards model to infer mutation motifs and their effects. In order to estimate model parameters, our method uses a Monte Carlo EM algorithm to marginalize over the unknown ordering of mutations. We show that our method performs better on simulated data compared to current methods and leads to more parsimonious models. The application of proportional hazards to mutation processes is, to our knowledge, novel and formalizes the current methods in a statistical framework that can be easily extended to analyze the effect of other biological features on mutation rates.

| S-EPMC7673484 | biostudies-literature

High-dimensional, massive sample-size Cox proportional hazards regression for survival analysis.

Project description:Survival analysis endures as an old, yet active research field with applications that spread across many domains. Continuing improvements in data acquisition techniques pose constant challenges in applying existing survival analysis methods to these emerging data sets. In this paper, we present tools for fitting regularized Cox survival analysis models on high-dimensional, massive sample-size (HDMSS) data using a variant of the cyclic coordinate descent optimization technique tailored for the sparsity that HDMSS data often present. Experiments on two real data examples demonstrate that efficient analyses of HDMSS data using these tools result in improved predictive performance and calibration.

| S-EPMC3944969 | biostudies-literature

A double-Cox model for non-proportional hazards survival analysis with frailty.

Project description:The Cox regression, a semi-parametric method of survival analysis, is extremely popular in biomedical applications. The proportional hazards assumption is a key requirement in the Cox model. To accommodate non-proportional hazards, we propose to parameterize the shape parameter of the baseline hazard function using the additional, separate Cox-regression term which depends on the vector of the covariates. This parametrization retains the general form of the hazard function over the strata and is similar to one in Devarajan and Ebrahimi (Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011;55:667-676) in the case of the Weibull distribution, but differs for other hazard functions. We call this model the double-Cox model. We formally introduce the double-Cox model with shared frailty and investigate, by simulation, the estimation bias and the coverage of the proposed point and interval estimation methods for the Gompertz and the Weibull baseline hazards. For real-life applications with low frailty variance and a large number of clusters, the marginal likelihood estimation is almost unbiased and the profile likelihood-based confidence intervals provide good coverage for all model parameters. We also compare the results from the over-parametrized double-Cox model to those from the standard Cox model with frailty in the case of the scale-only proportional hazards. The model is illustrated on an example of the survival after a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The R programs for fitting the double-Cox model are available on Github.

| S-EPMC10946853 | biostudies-literature

Mediation Analysis with Survival Outcomes: Accelerated Failure Time vs. Proportional Hazards Models.

Project description:ObjectiveSurvival time is an important type of outcome variable in treatment research. Currently, limited guidance is available regarding performing mediation analyses with survival outcomes, which generally do not have normally distributed errors, and contain unobserved (censored) events. We present considerations for choosing an approach, using a comparison of semi-parametric proportional hazards (PH) and fully parametric accelerated failure time (AFT) approaches for illustration.MethodWe compare PH and AFT models and procedures in their integration into mediation models and review their ability to produce coefficients that estimate causal effects. Using simulation studies modeling Weibull-distributed survival times, we compare statistical properties of mediation analyses incorporating PH and AFT approaches (employing SAS procedures PHREG and LIFEREG, respectively) under varied data conditions, some including censoring. A simulated data set illustrates the findings.ResultsAFT models integrate more easily than PH models into mediation models. Furthermore, mediation analyses incorporating LIFEREG produce coefficients that can estimate causal effects, and demonstrate superior statistical properties. Censoring introduces bias in the coefficient estimate representing the treatment effect on outcome-underestimation in LIFEREG, and overestimation in PHREG. With LIFEREG, this bias can be addressed using an alternative estimate obtained from combining other coefficients, whereas this is not possible with PHREG.ConclusionsWhen Weibull assumptions are not violated, there are compelling advantages to using LIFEREG over PHREG for mediation analyses involving survival-time outcomes. Irrespective of the procedures used, the interpretation of coefficients, effects of censoring on coefficient estimates, and statistical properties should be taken into account when reporting results.

| S-EPMC4811962 | biostudies-literature

Estimation of Stratified Mark-Specific Proportional Hazards Models under Two-Phase Sampling with Application to HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials.

Project description:An objective of preventive HIV vaccine efficacy trials is to understand how vaccine-induced immune responses to specific protein sequences of HIV-1 associate with subsequent infection with specific sequences of HIV, where the immune response biomarkers are measured in vaccine recipients via a two-phase sampling design. Motivated by this objective, we investigate the stratified mark-specific proportional hazards model under two-phase biomarker sampling, where the mark is the genetic distance of an infecting HIV-1 sequence to an HIV-1 sequence represented inside the vaccine. Estimation and inference procedures based on inverse probability weighting of complete-cases and on augmented inverse probability weighting of complete-cases are developed. Asymptotic properties of the estimators are derived and their finite-sample performances are examined in simulation studies. The methods are shown to have satisfactory performance, and are applied to the RV144 vaccine trial to assess whether immune response correlates of HIV-1 infection are stronger for HIV-1 infecting sequences similar to the vaccine than for sequences distant from the vaccine. Augmented inverse probability weighting; auxiliary variables; case-cohort design; censored failure time; competing risks; HIV vaccine efficacy trial.

| S-EPMC5540271 | biostudies-literature

On estimation of covariate-specific residual time quantiles under the proportional hazards model.

Project description:Estimation and inference in time-to-event analysis typically focus on hazard functions and their ratios under the Cox proportional hazards model. These hazard functions, while popular in the statistical literature, are not always easily or intuitively communicated in clinical practice, such as in the settings of patient counseling or resource planning. Expressing and comparing quantiles of event times may allow for easier understanding. In this article we focus on residual time, i.e., the remaining time-to-event at an arbitrary time t given that the event has yet to occur by t. In particular, we develop estimation and inference procedures for covariate-specific quantiles of the residual time under the Cox model. Our methods and theory are assessed by simulations, and demonstrated in analysis of two real data sets.

| S-EPMC4699877 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data