Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter Calculations.


ABSTRACT: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) provides quantitative metrics (e.g. Ktrans, ve) via pharmacokinetic models. We tested inter-algorithm variability in these quantitative metrics with 11 published DCE-MRI algorithms, all implementing Tofts-Kermode or extended Tofts pharmacokinetic models. Digital reference objects (DROs) with known Ktrans and ve values were used to assess performance at varying noise levels. Additionally, DCE-MRI data from 15 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients over 3 time-points during chemoradiotherapy were used to ascertain Ktrans and ve kinetic trends across algorithms. Algorithms performed well (less than 3% average error) when no noise was present in the DRO. With noise, 87% of Ktrans and 84% of ve algorithm-DRO combinations were generally in the correct order. Low Krippendorff's alpha values showed that algorithms could not consistently classify patients as above or below the median for a given algorithm at each time point or for differences in values between time points. A majority of the algorithms produced a significant Spearman correlation in ve of the primary gross tumor volume with time. Algorithmic differences in Ktrans and ve values over time indicate limitations in combining/comparing data from distinct DCE-MRI model implementations. Careful cross-algorithm quality-assurance must be utilized as DCE-MRI results may not be interpretable using differing software.

SUBMITTER: Joint Head and Neck Radiotherapy-MRI Development Cooperative 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5593829 | biostudies-other | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter Calculations.

Scientific reports 20170911 1


Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) provides quantitative metrics (e.g. K<sup>trans</sup>, v<sub>e</sub>) via pharmacokinetic models. We tested inter-algorithm variability in these quantitative metrics with 11 published DCE-MRI algorithms, all implementing Tofts-Kermode or extended Tofts pharmacokinetic models. Digital reference objects (DROs) with known K<sup>trans</sup> and v<sub>e</sub> values were used to assess performance at varying noise levels. Additionally, DC  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5522164 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6226386 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5810424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2435006 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4891499 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8775965 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6450635 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5250661 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6355631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7807538 | biostudies-literature