Dataset Information

"Health in the Mirror": An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology.

ABSTRACT: Background: The introduction of aesthetic care programs for cancer patients inside hospitals could help patients cope with the side effects of both disease and treatment. The specific objective of this study is to evaluate whether a complementary and supportive program, called "Health in the Mirror," has a positive effect on participants by analyzing certain psychological variables. Methods: Eighty-eight female cancer patients were included in this analysis. The support program is composed of three group aesthetic interventions that address both physical and psychological aspects that accompany cancer and its treatment. Patients were asked to complete a battery of tests in order to measure the impact of the program on certain psychological variables including anxiety, depression, body image, self-esteem, and quality of life. Outcome variables were measured at three different time-points: prior to participation, on the last day of the program, and after a 3-month follow-up. Results: Participating in the psychosocial support program "Health in the Mirror" determines an improvement in the psychological variables measured. Results revealed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms, anxiety and body image issues, as well as an improvement in self-esteem levels; this suggests that participating in this program could facilitate better adjustment to disease and treatment. Discussion: This study legitimizes the importance of implementing supportive and complementary therapies together with conventional therapies; the therapeutic approach to cancer cannot be restricted solely to medical care, but it must consider the patient as a whole person with needs that are not only physical or medical, but also psychological, social, and existential.

SUBMITTER: Di Mattei VE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5613306 | biostudies-other | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

"Health in the Mirror": An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology.

Di Mattei Valentina E VE Carnelli Letizia L Taranto Paola P Bernardi Martina M Brombin Chiara C Cugnata Federica F Noviello Angela A Currin Morag M Mangili Giorgia G Rabaiotti Emanuela E Sarno Lucio L Candiani Massimo M

Frontiers in psychology 20170921

<b>Background:</b> The introduction of aesthetic care programs for cancer patients inside hospitals could help patients cope with the side effects of both disease and treatment. The specific objective of this study is to evaluate whether a complementary and supportive program, called "Health in the Mirror," has a positive effect on participants by analyzing certain psychological variables. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty-eight female cancer patients were included in this analysis. The support program is ...[more]

PMID: 28983271

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic severely affected everyday life and working conditions for most Europeans, particularly health care professionals (HCPs). Over the past 3 years, various policies have been implemented in various European countries. Studies have reported on the worsening of mental health, work-related stress, and helpful coping strategies. However, having a closer look is still necessary to gain more information on the psychosocial stressors and unmet needs of HCPs as well as nonmedical staff.ObjectiveThis study aimed to obtain quantitative information on job-related stressors of physicians and nurses and the coping strategies of HCPs and nonmedical staff at 2 periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. By further analyzing qualitative comments, we wanted to gain more information on the psychosocial stressors and unmet needs of HCPs as well as nonmedical staff on different levels of experience.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted at 2 time points during the COVID-19 pandemic in several European countries. The first study period (T1) lasted between April 1 and June 20, 2020, and the second study period (T2) lasted between November 25, 2021, and February 28, 2022. On a quantitative level, we used a questionnaire on stressors for physicians and nurses and a questionnaire on coping strategies for HCPs and nonmedical staff. Quantitative data were descriptively analyzed for mean values and differences in stressors and coping strategies. Qualitative data of free-text boxes of HCPs and nonmedical staff were analyzed via thematic analysis to explore the experiences of the individuals.ResultsT1 comprised 609 participants, and T2 comprised 1398 participants. Overall, 296 participants made 438 qualitative comments. The uncertainty about when the pandemic would be controlled (T1: mean 2.28, SD 0.85; T2: mean 2.08, SD 0.90) and the fear of infecting the family (T1: mean 2.26, SD 0.98; T2: mean 2.02, SD 1.02) were the most severe stressors identified by physicians and nurses in both periods. Overall, the use of protective measures (T1: mean 2.66, SD 0.60; T2: mean 2.66, SD 0.60) and acquiring information about COVID-19 (T1: mean 2.29, SD 0.82; T2: mean 1.99, SD 0.89) were identified as the most common coping strategies for the entire study population. Using thematic analysis, we identified 8 themes of personal experiences on the micro, meso, and macro levels. Measures, working conditions, feelings and emotions, and social climate were frequently mentioned topics of the participants. In T1, feelings of isolation and uncertainty were prominent. In T2, feelings of exhaustion were expressed and vaccination was frequently discussed. Moreover, unmet psychosocial needs were identified.ConclusionsThere is a need for improvement in pandemic preparedness. Targeted vocational education measures and setting up of web-based mental health support could be useful to bridge gaps in psychosocial support needs in future crises.

Project description:ImportancePatients with cancer experience multiple supportive care needs (eg, coping and financial counseling) that, if not addressed, may result in poor clinical outcomes. Limited work has assessed the factors associated with unmet needs in large and diverse samples of ambulatory oncology patients.ObjectiveTo characterize the factors associated with unmet supportive care needs among ambulatory oncology patients and to assess whether such needs were associated with emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.Design, setting, and participantsBetween October 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022, cross-sectional retrospective analyses were performed in a large and diverse ambulatory cancer population via My Wellness Check, an electronic health record (EHR)-based supportive care needs and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) screening and referral program.Main outcomes and measuresDemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes were extracted from EHRs. Data on PROs (ie, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, and physical function), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and supportive care needs were also collected. Logistic regressions examined factors associated with unmet needs. Cumulative incidence of ED visits and hospitalizations were assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for covariates.ResultsThe 5236 patients in the study had a mean (SD) age of 62.6 (13.1) years and included 2949 women (56.3%), 2506 Hispanic or Latino patients (47.9%), and 4618 White patients (88.2%); 1370 patients (26.2%) indicated Spanish as their preferred language, according to their EHR. A total of 940 patients (18.0%) reported 1 or more unmet needs. Black race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.49-2.60]), Hispanic ethnicity (AOR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.10-1.55]), 1 to 5 years after diagnosis (AOR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.54-0.77]), more than 5 years after diagnosis (AOR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.76]), anxiety (AOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.71-2.95]), depression (AOR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.58-2.70]), poor physical function (AOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.07-1.79]), and low HRQOL scores (AOR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.50-2.39]) were associated with greater unmet needs. Patients with unmet needs had a significantly higher risk of ED visits (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.74]) and hospitalizations (AHR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.13-1.63]) relative to patients without unmet needs.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of ambulatory oncology patients, unmet supportive care needs were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups and those with greater emotional or physical burden were more likely to have 1 or more unmet needs. Results suggest that addressing unmet supportive care needs may be crucial for improving clinical outcomes, and targeted efforts should focus on specific populations.

Dataset Information

"Health in the Mirror": An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology.

Publications

"Health in the Mirror": An Unconventional Approach to Unmet Psychological Needs in Oncology.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets