Dataset Information

Role of endoscopic biliary drainage in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with jaundice.

ABSTRACT: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with jaundice have an extremely poor prognosis. Although biliary drainage can resolve obstructive jaundice, signs of obstruction may not be evident. This study evaluated the role of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with advanced HCC and obstructive jaundice.From 2010 to 2015, 74 patients underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice due to advanced HCC. Jaundice resolution was defined as complete response and total bilirubin concentration below 3 mg/dl.The technical success rate in the 74 patients was 92.1% (70/76). Of the 70 patients who underwent successful biliary drainage, 48 (68.6%) and 22 (31.4%) were Child-Pugh classes B and C, respectively, and 10 (14.3%) and 60 (85.7%) were BCLC stages B and C, respectively. Intrahepatic bile duct (IHD) dilatation was observed in 35 patients (50%). After drainage, the complete response rate was 35.7% (25/70). The mean time to resolution was 17.4 ±8.5 days. However, jaundice was re-aggravated in 74.3% (15/25) after a mean 103.5 ±96.4 days. Multivariate analysis showed that the absence of ascites, presence of IHD dilatation, normal range of prothrombin time, and lower MELD score were significantly associated with complete response. The overall survival rate was 15.7% (11/70) and the median survival time is 28 days (95% confidence interval 2.6-563 days). Complete response and HCC treatment after drainage were significantly associated with survival.Effective endoscopic biliary drainage is an important palliative treatment in patients with advanced HCC and obstructive jaundice, especially those with IHD dilatation and preserved liver function, as determined by ascites, prothrombin time, and MELD score.

SUBMITTER: Woo HY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5667855 | biostudies-other | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Role of endoscopic biliary drainage in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with jaundice.

Woo Hyun Young HY Han Sung Yong SY Heo Jeong J Kim Dong Uk DU Baek Dong Hoon DH Yoo So Yong SY Kim Chang Won CW Kim Suk S Song Geun Am GA Cho Mong M Kang Dae Hwan DH

PloS one 20171102 11

<h4>Background</h4>Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with jaundice have an extremely poor prognosis. Although biliary drainage can resolve obstructive jaundice, signs of obstruction may not be evident. This study evaluated the role of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with advanced HCC and obstructive jaundice.<h4>Methods</h4>From 2010 to 2015, 74 patients underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice due to advanced HCC. Jaundice resolution was defined ...[more]

PMID: 29095941

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The role of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on obstructive jaundice patients is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study is to clarify the effect of PBD on postoperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and explore a reasonable PBD strategy for periampullary carcinomas (PAC) patients with obstructive jaundice before surgery. Methods A total of 148 patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent PD were enrolled in this research and divided into drainage group and no-drainage group according to whether they received PBD. Patients who received PBD were classified into long-term group (>2 weeks) and short-term group (≤2 weeks) according to PBD duration. The clinical data of patients were statistically compared between groups to explore the influence of PBD and its duration. Analysis of pathogens in bile and peritoneal fluid was performed to probe the role of bile pathogens in opportunistic pathogenic bacterial infection after PD. Results Of all, 98 patients underwent PBD. The mean duration between drainage and surgery was 13 days. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infection was significantly higher in the drainage group than the no-drainage group (P=0.026). In patients with total bilirubin (TB) less than 250 µmol/L, postoperative intra-abdominal infection was more frequently observed in the drainage group compared to the no-drainage group (P=0.022). Compared to the short-term drainage group, the proportion of positive ascites culture was significantly higher in the long-term drainage group (P=0.022). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications between short-term group and no-drainage group. The most frequent pathogens detected in bile were Klebsiella pneumoniae, hemolytic Streptococcus and Enterococcus faecalis. The most commonly detected pathogens in peritoneal fluid were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis which appeared to have a high agreement with pathogens in preoperative bile cultures. Conclusions Routine PBD should not be performed in obstructive jaundice PAC patients with TB less than 250 µmol/L. For patients with indications for PBD, the drainage duration should be controlled within 2 weeks. Bile bacteria may represent a major source of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria infection after PD.

Project description:To compare the outcomes of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Data from 153 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage prior to PD between January 2009 and July 2016 were analyzed. We compared the clinical data, procedure-related complications of endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) and postoperative complications of PD between the ENBD and ERBD groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to identify the risk factors for deep abdominal infection after PD.One hundred and two (66.7%) patients underwent ENBD, and 51 (33.3%) patients underwent ERBD. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was less frequently performed in the ENBD group than in the ERBD group (P = 0.039); the EBD duration in the ENBD group was shorter than that in the ERBD group (P = 0.036). After EBD, the levels of total bilirubin (TB) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were obviously decreased in both groups, and the decreases of TB and ALT in the ERBD group were greater than those in the ENBD group (P = 0.004 and P = 0.000, respectively). However, the rate of EBD procedure-related cholangitis was significantly higher in the ERBD group than in the ENBD group (P = 0.007). The postoperative complications of PD as graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification system were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.864). However, the incidence of deep abdominal infection after PD was significantly lower in the ENBD group than in the ERBD group (P = 0.019). Male gender (OR = 3.92; 95%CI: 1.63-9.47; P = 0.002), soft pancreas texture (OR = 3.60; 95%CI: 1.37-9.49; P = 0.009), length of biliary stricture (≥ 1.5 cm) (OR = 5.20; 95%CI: 2.23-12.16; P = 0.000) and ERBD method (OR = 4.08; 95%CI: 1.69-9.87; P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for deep abdominal infection after PD.ENBD is an optimal method for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction prior to PD. ERBD is superior to ENBD in terms of patient tolerance and the effect of biliary drainage but is associated with an increased risk of EBD procedure-related cholangitis and deep abdominal infection after PD.

Project description:Background and Objectives: Biliary drainage (BD) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) could be obtained endoscopically with different techniques or with a percutaneous approach. Every endoscopic technique could be challenging and not clearly superior over another. The aim of this survey is to explore which is the standard BD approach in patients with SAA. Materials and Methods: A 34-question online survey was sent to different Italian tertiary and non-tertiary endoscopic centers performing interventional biliopancreatic endoscopy. The core of the survey was focused on the first-line and alternative BD approaches to SAA patients with benign or malignant obstruction. Results: Out of 70 centers, 39 answered the survey (response rate: 56%). Only 48.7% of them declared themselves to be reference centers for endoscopic BD in SAA. The total number of procedures performed per year is usually low, especially in non-tertiary centers; however, they have a low tendency to refer to more experienced centers. In the case of Billroth-II reconstruction, the majority of centers declared that they use a duodenoscope or forward-viewing scope in both benign and malignant diseases as a first approach. However, in the case of failure, the BD approach becomes extremely heterogeneous among centers without any technique prevailing over the others. Interestingly, in the case of Roux-en-Y, a significant proportion of centers declared that they choose the percutaneous approach in both benign (35.1%) and malignant obstruction (32.4%) as a first option. In the case of a previous failed attempt at BD in Roux-en-Y, the subsequent most used approach is the EUS-guided intervention in both benign and malignant indications. Conclusions: This survey shows that the endoscopic BD approach is extremely heterogeneous, especially in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction or after ERCP failure in Billroth-II reconstruction. Percutaneous BD is still taken into account by a significant proportion of centers in the case of Roux-en-Y anatomy. The total number of endoscopic BD procedures performed in non-tertiary centers is usually low, but this result does not correspond to an adequate rate of referral to more experienced centers.

Dataset Information

Role of endoscopic biliary drainage in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with jaundice.

Publications

Role of endoscopic biliary drainage in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with jaundice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets