Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Applying an information literacy rubric to first-year health sciences student research posters.


ABSTRACT: This article describes the collection and analysis of annotated bibliographies created by first-year health sciences students to support their final poster projects. The authors examined the students' abilities to select relevant and authoritative sources, summarize the content of those sources, and correctly cite those sources.We collected images of 1,253 posters, of which 120 were sampled for analysis, and scored the posters using a 4-point rubric to evaluate the students' information literacy skills.We found that 52% of students were proficient at selecting relevant sources that directly contributed to the themes, topics, or debates presented in their final poster projects, and 64% of students did well with selecting authoritative peer-reviewed scholarly sources related to their topics. However, 45% of students showed difficulty in correctly applying American Psychological Association (APA) citation style.Our findings demonstrate a need for instructors and librarians to provide strategies for reading and comprehending scholarly articles in addition to properly using APA citation style.

SUBMITTER: Goodman X 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5764575 | biostudies-other | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Applying an information literacy rubric to first-year health sciences student research posters.

Goodman Xan X   Watts John J   Arenas Rogelio R   Weigel Rachelle R   Terrell Tony T  

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 20180102 1


<h4>Objective</h4>This article describes the collection and analysis of annotated bibliographies created by first-year health sciences students to support their final poster projects. The authors examined the students' abilities to select relevant and authoritative sources, summarize the content of those sources, and correctly cite those sources.<h4>Methods</h4>We collected images of 1,253 posters, of which 120 were sampled for analysis, and scored the posters using a 4-point rubric to evaluate  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2759165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5624424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9135323 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6693735 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4056165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2859272 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8715808 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6148603 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6784339 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6312143 | biostudies-literature