Dataset Information

Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients with heart failure.

ABSTRACT: To determine the prevalence, incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients referred with suspected heart failure.Consecutive patients referred with suspected heart failure were prospectively enrolled. After excluding patients with implantable cardiac devices and atrial fibrillation, 1420 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HeFREF) [age: median 71 (interquartile range IQR 63-78) years; men: 71%; NT-ProBNP: 1319 (583-3378) ng/L], 1094 with heart failure and normal ejection fraction (HeFNEF) [age: 76 (70-82) years; men: 47%; NT-ProBNP: 547 (321-1171) ng/L], and 1150 without heart failure [age: 68 (60-75) years; men: 51%; NT-ProBNP: 86 (46-140) ng/L] were included. The prevalence of first-degree heart block [heart rate corrected PR interval (PRc)?>?200 ms] was higher in patients with heart failure (21% HeFREF, 20% HeFNEF, 9% without heart failure). In patients with HeFREF or HeFNEF, longer baseline PRc was associated with greater age, male sex, and longer QRS duration, and, in those with HeFREF, treatment with amiodarone or digoxin. Patients with heart failure in the longest PRc quartile had worse survival compared to shorter PRc quartiles, but PRc was not independently associated with survival in multivariable analysis. For patients without heart failure, shorter baseline PRc was independently associated with worse survival.PRc prolongation is common in patients with HeFREF or HeFNEF and associated with worse survival, although not an independent predictor of outcome. The results of clinical trials investigating the therapeutic potential of shortening the PR interval by pacing are awaited.

SUBMITTER: Nikolaidou T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5790844 | biostudies-other | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients with heart failure.

Nikolaidou Theodora T Pellicori Pierpaolo P Zhang Jufen J Kazmi Syed S Goode Kevin M KM Cleland John G JG Clark Andrew L AL

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society 20170915 2

<h4>Aims</h4>To determine the prevalence, incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients referred with suspected heart failure.<h4>Methods and results</h4>Consecutive patients referred with suspected heart failure were prospectively enrolled. After excluding patients with implantable cardiac devices and atrial fibrillation, 1420 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HeFREF) [age: median 71 (interquartile range IQR 63-78) years; men ...[more]

PMID: 28917011

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrevious reports on the epidemiology, influencing factors, and the prognostic value of the components of PR interval in hospitalized heart failure patients were limited.MethodsThis study retrospectively enrolled 1182 patients hospitalized with heart failure from 2014 to 2017. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the association between the components of PR interval and the baseline parameters. The primary outcome was all-cause death or heart transplantation. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models were constructed to explore the predictive value of the components of PR interval for the primary outcome.ResultsIn multiple linear regression analysis, higher height (for every 10 cm increase in height: regression coefficient 4.83, P < 0.001) as well as larger atrial and ventricular size were associated with larger P wave duration but not with PR segment. The primary outcome occurred in 310 patients after an average follow-up of 2.39 years. Cox regression analyses revealed that the increase in PR segment was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (every 10 ms increase: hazard ratio 1.041, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.010-1.083, P = 0.023), whereas the P wave duration did not show significant correlation. When adding the PR segment to an initial prognostic prediction model, the likelihood ratio test and categorical net reclassification index (NRI) showed a significant improvement, but the increase in C-index was not significant. In subgroup analysis, increased PR segment was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint in patients taller than 170 cm (each 10 ms increase: hazard ratio 1.153, 95% CI 1.085-1.225, P < 0.001) but not the shorter group (P for interaction = 0.006).ConclusionsIn hospitalized patients with heart failure, longer PR segment was an independent predictor of the composite endpoint of all-cause death and heart transplantation, especially in the taller group, but it had limited significance in improving the prognostic risk stratification of this population.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with heart failure (HF) have multiple coexisting comorbidities. The temporal trends in the burden of comorbidities and associated risk of mortality among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are not well established.MethodsHF-related hospitalizations were sampled by stratified design from 4 US areas in 2005 to 2014 by the community surveillance component of the ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Acute decompensated HF was classified by standardized physician review and a previously validated algorithm. An ejection fraction <50% was considered HFrEF. A total of 15 comorbidities were abstracted from the medical record. Mortality outcomes were ascertained for up to 1-year postadmission by linking hospital records with death files.ResultsA total of 5460 hospitalizations (24 937 weighted hospitalizations) classified as acute decompensated HF had available ejection fraction data (53% female, 68% white, 53% HFrEF, 47% HFpEF). The average number of comorbidities was higher for patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF, both for women (5.53 versus 4.94; P<0.0001) and men (5.20 versus 4.82; P<0.0001). There was a significant temporal increase in the overall burden of comorbidities, both for patients with HFpEF (women: 5.17 in 2005-2009 to 5.87 in 2010-2013; men: 4.94 in 2005-2009 and 5.45 in 2010-2013) and HFrEF (women: 4.78 in 2005-2009 to 5.14 in 2010-2013; men: 4.62 in 2005-2009 and 5.06 in 2010-2013; P-trend<0.0001 for all). Higher comorbidity burden was significantly associated with higher adjusted risk of 1-year mortality, with a stronger association noted for HFpEF (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 higher comorbidity, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.14-1.25] versus HFrEF (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.14]; P for interaction by HF type=0.02). The associated mortality risk per 1 higher comorbidity also increased significantly over time for patients with HFpEF and HFrEF, as well (P for interaction with time=0.002 and 0.02, respectively) Conclusions: The burden of comorbidities among hospitalized patients with acute decompensated HFpEF and HFrEF has increased over time, as has its associated mortality risk. Higher burden of comorbidities is associated with higher risk of mortality, with a stronger association noted among patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF.

Project description:We investigated the association between the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc interval) measured by standard electrocardiography and heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). From March 1, 2009, to December 12, 2009, 411 patients with T2DM who underwent resting 12-lead electrocardiography and cardiovascular autonomic function testing concurrently without the exclusion criteria were consecutively recruited in this cross-sectional study. Time- and frequency-domain HRV variables were assessed for 5 minutes by beat-to-beat HRV recording. The QT interval was corrected for the heart rate using Bazett's formula. QTc interval measurements of >440 ms were considered abnormally prolonged. The mean age and diabetes duration were 56.3 ± 10.6 years and 9.6 ± 7.3 years, respectively. A total of 90 patients had QTc interval prolongation (21.9%). The participants with a prolonged QTc interval were older (59.4 ± 10.1 years vs 55.5 ± 10.6 years, P = .002), were more likely to be a woman (72.2% vs 51.7%, P = .001), had a higher prevalence of hypertension (46.7% vs 33.4%, P = .022), had a higher hemoglobin A1c level (8.8% ± 2.2% vs 8.2% ± 1.8%, P = .045), and had decreased values for the variables measuring HRV, except for the low frequency (LF)/high frequency (HF) ratio (total power [TP], 147.7 [74.1-335.9] ms vs 328.7 [185.7-721.7] ms, P = .002). After adjusting for multiple confounders, QTc interval prolongation was associated with the lowest quartile of the HRV parameters of TP (odds ratio [OR] = 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29-6.96), HF (OR = 3.20; 95% CI: 1.84-5.58), LF (OR = 3.68; 95% CI: 2.10-6.43), standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (OR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.89-5.77), and root-mean-square of the successive differences (OR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.13-3.47) in patients with T2DM. Decreased values for the variables measuring HRV, except for the LF/HF ratio, might be associated with QTc interval prolongation in patients with T2DM.

Dataset Information

Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients with heart failure.

Publications

Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic implications of PR interval prolongation in patients with heart failure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets