Dataset Information

Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans.

ABSTRACT: Background:Partial nephrectomy is considered the preferred care for localized kidney tumors and may yield better patient and kidney survival and similar oncological outcomes compared with radical nephrectomy. We sought to reexamine these hypotheses in a large nationally representative cohort of US veterans who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy. Methods:We identified 7073 US veterans who had a partial or radical nephrectomy between 2004 and 2013. We collected data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) prior to admission for nephrectomy surgery, immediately after surgery and 180 days postsurgery. We evaluated the association of nephrectomy type and eGFR at different time points with long-term mortality risk in adjusted survival models. Results:Patients who underwent radical (compared to partial) nephrectomy had a 2-fold greater decline in eGFR (-21.8 ± 17.7 versus -10.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2) immediately after surgery. This larger drop in eGFR resulted in a larger proportion of radical nephrectomy patients having an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ?180 days postsurgery. Radical (compared to partial) nephrectomy patients also exhibited a 2.2-fold higher mortality [adjusted death hazard ratio 2.21 (95% confidence interval 1.91-2.55)]. Low eGFRs prior to surgery and 180 days postsurgery were associated with higher risk of postnephrectomy death. Conclusions:Worse postnephrectomy kidney function and higher mortality were observed with radical nephrectomy, and a low presurgical eGFR and a greater decrease in eGFR postsurgery were associated with worse mortality irrespective of the type of nephrectomy. Additional studies are needed to examine predictors of postnephrectomy outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Streja E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5837388 | biostudies-other | 2018 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans.

Streja Elani E Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar K Molnar Miklos Z MZ Landman Jaime J Arah Onyebuchi A OA Kovesdy Csaba P CP

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 20180101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Partial nephrectomy is considered the preferred care for localized kidney tumors and may yield better patient and kidney survival and similar oncological outcomes compared with radical nephrectomy. We sought to reexamine these hypotheses in a large nationally representative cohort of US veterans who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified 7073 US veterans who had a partial or radical nephrectomy between 2004 and 2013. We collected data on estimat ...[more]

PMID: 27798198

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPartial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy are the relevant surgical therapy options for localised renal cell carcinoma. However, debate regarding the effects of these surgical approaches continues and it is important to identify and summarise high-quality studies to make surgical treatment recommendations.ObjectivesTo assess the effects of partial nephrectomy compared with radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma.Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS, Scopus, two trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 24 February 2017, together with reference lists; and contacted selected experts in the field.Selection criteriaWe included a randomised controlled trial comparing partial and radical nephrectomy for participants with small renal masses.Data collection and analysisOne review author screened all of the titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Next, two review authors independently assessed full-text reports, identified relevant studies, evaluated the eligibility of the studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The update of the literature search was performed by two independent review authors. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and data analyses.Main resultsWe identified one randomised controlled trial including 541 participants that compared partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up was 9.3 years.Based on low quality evidence, we found that time-to-death of any cause was decreased using partial nephrectomy (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18). This corresponds to 79 more deaths (5 more to 173 more) per 1000. Also based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in serious adverse events (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.19 to 22.34). Findings are consistent with 4 more surgery-related deaths (3 fewer to 78 more) per 1000.Based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in time-to-recurrence (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.24). This corresponds to 12 more recurrences (14 fewer to 70 more) per 1000. Due to the nature of reporting, we were unable to analyse overall rates for immediate and long-term adverse events. We found no evidence on haemodialysis or quality of life.Reasons for downgrading related to study limitations (lack of blinding, cross-over), imprecision and indirectness (a substantial proportion of patients were ultimately found not to have a malignant tumour). Based on the finding of a single trial, we were unable to conduct any subgroup or sensitivity analyses.Authors' conclusionsPartial nephrectomy may be associated with a decreased time-to-death of any cause. With regards to surgery-related mortality, cancer-specific survival and time-to-recurrence, partial nephrectomy appears to result in little to no difference.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral predictive factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) following radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) have been identified. However, early postoperative laboratory values were infrequently considered as potential predictors. Therefore, this study aimed to develop predictive models for CKD 1 year after RN or PN using early postoperative laboratory values, including serum creatinine (SCr) levels, in addition to preoperative and intraoperative factors. Moreover, the optimal SCr sampling time point for the best prediction of CKD was determined.MethodsData were retrospectively collected from patients with renal cell cancer who underwent laparoscopic or robotic RN (n = 557) or PN (n = 999). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, including laboratory values, were incorporated during model development. We developed 8 final models using information collected at different time points (preoperative, postoperative day [POD] 0 to 5, and postoperative 1 month). Lastly, we combined all possible subsets of the developed models to generate 120 meta-models. Furthermore, we built a web application to facilitate the implementation of the model.ResultsThe magnitude of postoperative elevation of SCr and history of CKD were the most important predictors for CKD at 1 year, followed by RN (compared to PN) and older age. Among the final models, the model using features of POD 4 showed the best performance for correctly predicting the stages of CKD at 1 year compared to other models (accuracy: 79% of POD 4 model versus 75% of POD 0 model, 76% of POD 1 model, 77% of POD 2 model, 78% of POD 3 model, 76% of POD 5 model, and 73% in postoperative 1 month model). Therefore, POD 4 may be the optimal sampling time point for postoperative SCr. A web application is hosted at https://dongy.shinyapps.io/aki_ckd .ConclusionsOur predictive model, which incorporated postoperative laboratory values, especially SCr levels, in addition to preoperative and intraoperative factors, effectively predicted the occurrence of CKD 1 year after RN or PN and may be helpful for comprehensive management planning.

Project description:Although partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment for many patients with early-stage kidney cancer, recent clinical trial data, which demonstrate better survival for patients treated with radical nephrectomy, have generated new uncertainty regarding the comparative effectiveness of these treatment options.To compare long-term survival after partial vs radical nephrectomy among a population-based patient cohort whose treatment reflects contemporary surgical practice.We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with clinical stage T1a kidney cancer treated with partial or radical nephrectomy from 1992 through 2007. Using an instrumental variable approach to account for measured and unmeasured differences between treatment groups, we fit a 2-stage residual inclusion model to estimate the treatment effect of partial nephrectomy on long-term survival.Overall and kidney cancer-specific survival.Among 7138 Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage kidney cancer, we identified 1925 patients (27.0%) treated with partial nephrectomy and 5213 patients (73.0%) treated with radical nephrectomy. During a median follow-up of 62 months, 487 (25.3%) and 2164 (41.5%) patients died following partial or radical nephrectomy, respectively. Kidney cancer was the cause of death for 37 patients (1.9%) treated with partial nephrectomy, and 222 patients (4.3%) treated with radical nephrectomy. Patients treated with partial nephrectomy had a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.85). This corresponded with a predicted survival increase with partial nephrectomy of 5.6 (95% CI, 1.9-9.3), 11.8 (95% CI, 3.9-19.7), and 15.5 (95% CI, 5.0-26.0) percentage points at 2, 5, and 8 years posttreatment (P < .001). No difference was noted in kidney cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.19-3.49).Among Medicare beneficiaries with early-stage kidney cancer who were candidates for either surgery, treatment with partial rather than radical nephrectomy was associated with improved survival.

Project description:New findingsWhat is the central question of this study? Urotensin II is upregulated in patients in the later stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in individuals requiring dialysis. Could treatment with a urotensin II receptor antagonist slow progression of renal disease? What is the main finding and its importance? In the rat, expression of urotensin II and its receptor increased, extending into cortical structures as CKD progressed towards end-stage renal failure. Subchronic treatment with a urotensin receptor antagonist slowed but did not prevent progression of CKD. This suggests that urotensin II contributes to the decline in renal function in CKD.AbstractElevated serum and urine urotensin II (UII) concentrations have been reported in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar increases in UII and its receptor, UT, have been reported in animal models of CKD, but only at much earlier stages of renal dysfunction. The aim of this study was to characterize urotensin system expression as renal disease progresses to end-stage failure in a ⅚ subtotal nephrectomy (SNx) rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent SNx or sham surgery and were killed at 8 weeks postsurgery [early (E)] or immediately before end-stage renal failure [30 ± 3 weeks postsurgery; late (L)]. Systolic blood pressure, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio and glomerulosclerosis index were all increased in SNx-E rats compared with sham-E by 8 weeks postsurgery. These changes were associated with an increase in renal immunoreactive UII staining but little change in UT expression. As CKD progressed to end-stage disease in the SNx-L group, markers of renal function deteriorated further, in association with a marked increase in immunoreactive UII and UT staining. Subchronic administration of a UT antagonist, SB-611812, at 30 mg kg-1 day-1 for 13 weeks, in a separate group of SNx rats resulted in a 2 week delay in the increase in both systolic blood pressure and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio observed in vehicle-treated SNx but did not prevent the progression of renal dysfunction. The urotensin system is upregulated as renal function deteriorates in the rat; UT antagonism can slow but not prevent disease progression, suggesting that UII plays a role in CKD.

Project description:ImportanceThere are limited data for the utility of statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and death in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD).ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of statin use with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among US veterans older than 65 years with CKD stages 3 to 4.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study used a target trial emulation design for statin initiation among veterans with moderate CKD (stages 3 or 4) using nested trials with a propensity weighting approach. Linked Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Medicare, and Medicaid data were used. This study considered veterans newly diagnosed with moderate CKD between 2005 and 2015 in the VA, with follow-up through December 31, 2017. Veterans were older than 65 years, within 5 years of CKD diagnosis, had no prior ASCVD or statin use, and had at least 1 clinical visit in the year prior to trial baseline. Eligibility criteria were assessed for each nested trial, and Cox proportional hazards models with bootstrapping were run. Analysis was conducted from July 2021 to October 2023.ExposureStatin initiation vs none.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was time to first MACE (myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, stroke, revascularization, or mortality).ResultsIncluded in the analysis were 14 828 veterans. Mean (SD) age at CKD diagnosis was 76.9 (8.2) years, 14 616 (99%) were men, 10 539 (72%) White, and 2568 (17%) Black. After expanding to person-trials and assessing eligibility at each baseline, there were 151 243 person-trials (14 685 individuals) of nonstatin initiators and 2924 person-trials (2924 individuals) of statin initiators included. Propensity score adjustment via overlap weighting with nonparametric bootstrapping resulted in covariate balance, with mean (SD) follow-up of 3.6 (2.7) years. The hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97) comparing statin initiators to noninitiators. The hazard ratio for MACE was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1.02). Results remained consistent in prespecified subgroup analyses.Conclusions and relevanceIn this target trial emulation of statin initiation in US veterans older than 65 years with CKD stages 3 to 4 and no prior ASCVD, statin initiation was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality but not MACE. Results should be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial.

Dataset Information

Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans.

Publications

Radical versus partial nephrectomy, chronic kidney disease progression and mortality in US veterans.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets