Dataset Information

Patched 1 Expression Correlates with Biochemical Relapse in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

ABSTRACT: There is an unmet clinical need for adequate biomarkers to aid risk stratification and management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Even within the high-risk PCa category, not all patients will invariably have a poor prognosis, and improved stratification of this heterogeneous group is needed. In this context, components of the hedgehog (Hh) pathway may have promise as biomarkers, because the available evidence suggests increased Hh pathway activity may confer a poorer outcome in advanced and castrate-resistant PCa. In this study, potential associations between Hh pathway protein expression and clinicopathological factors, including time to biochemical recurrence (BCR), were investigated using a tissue microarray constructed from benign and malignant prostate samples from 75 predominantly high-risk PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Hh signaling activity was found to differ between benign and malignant prostate tissue, with a greater amount of active Hh signaling present in malignant than benign prostate epithelium. High expression of Patched 1 in malignant prostate epithelium was found to be an independent predictor of BCR in high-risk PCa patients. Glioma-associated oncogene 1 may potentially represent a clinically useful biomarker of an aggressive tumor phenotype. Evaluation of Hh signaling activity in PCa patients may be useful for risk stratification, and epithelial Patched 1 expression, in particular, may be a prognostic marker for BCR in high-risk PCa patients.

SUBMITTER: Gonnissen A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5840486 | biostudies-other | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patched 1 Expression Correlates with Biochemical Relapse in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Gonnissen Annelies A Isebaert Sofie S Perneel Christiaan C McKee Chad M CM Van Utterbeeck Filip F Lerut Evelyne E Verrill Clare C Bryant Richard J RJ Joniau Steven S Muschel Ruth J RJ Haustermans Karin K

The American journal of pathology 20180112 3

There is an unmet clinical need for adequate biomarkers to aid risk stratification and management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Even within the high-risk PCa category, not all patients will invariably have a poor prognosis, and improved stratification of this heterogeneous group is needed. In this context, components of the hedgehog (Hh) pathway may have promise as biomarkers, because the available evidence suggests increased Hh pathway activity may confer a poorer outcome in advanced and c ...[more]

PMID: 29339090

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInnovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management.ObjectiveTo present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022.Design, setting, and participantsBefore the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisConsensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement.Results and limitationsThe voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis.ConclusionsThese voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.Patient summaryThe Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.

Project description:PURPOSE:Since the success of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging for patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (ORPC), it is increasingly used for radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). Therefore, we developed a prognostic risk classification for biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) for patients after PSMA-PET-guided MDT after radical prostatectomy. METHODS:We analyzed 292 patients with local recurrence (LR) and/or pelvic lymph node (LN) lesions and/or up to five distant LN, bone (BM), or visceral metastases (VM) detected with [68Ga]PSMA-PET imaging. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 0-57). The primary endpoint was bRFS after MDT. Cox regression analysis for risk factors was incorporated into a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) with classification and regression tree method. RESULTS:PSA at recurrence ??0.8 ng/mL, BM, and VM was significantly associated with biochemical relapse. RPA showed five groups with tenfold cross-validation of 0.294 (SE 0.032). After building risk classes I to IV (p?<?0.0001), mean bRFS was 36.3 months (95% CI 32.4-40.1) in class I (PSA <?0.8 ng/mL, no BM) and 25.8 months (95% CI 22.5-29.1) in class II (PSA ??0.8 ng/mL, no BM, no VM). LR and/or pelvic LNs caused relapse in classes I and II. Mean bRFS was 16.0 months (95% CI 12.4-19.6) in class III (PSA irrelevant, present BM) and 5.7 months (95% CI 2.7-8.7) in class IV (PSA ??0.8 ng/mL, no BM, present VM). CONCLUSION:We developed and internally validated a risk classification for bRFS after PSMA-PET-guided MDT. Patients with PSA <?0.8 ng/mL and local relapse only (LR and/or pelvic LNs) had the most promising bRFS. PSA ??0.8 ng/mL and local relapse only (LR and/or pelvic LNs) indicated intermediate risk for failure. Patients with BM were at higher risk regardless of the PSA. However, those patients still show satisfactory bRFS. In patients with VM, bRFS is heavily decreased. MDT in such cases should be discussed individually.

Dataset Information

Patched 1 Expression Correlates with Biochemical Relapse in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Publications

Patched 1 Expression Correlates with Biochemical Relapse in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets