Dataset Information

American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 at Middle Age and Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction in Later Life.

ABSTRACT: The American Heart Association recommends focusing on 7 health factors (Life's Simple 7) for primordial prevention of cardiovascular health. However, whether greater adherence to Life's Simple 7 in midlife improves prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI) in later life is unknown.In 1277 participants who developed MI during the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study follow-up, a 14-point score of Life's Simple 7 was constructed according to the status (2 points for ideal, 1 point for intermediate, and 0 points for poor) of each of 7 factors (smoking, adiposity, physical activity, diet, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose) at baseline (1987-1989). Hazard ratios for composite and individual adverse outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, recurrent MI, heart failure, and stroke were calculated according to Life's Simple 7 score. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 918 participants (72%) had subsequent adverse outcomes after MI. Life's Simple 7 score at middle age was inversely associated with adverse outcomes after MI (adjusted hazard ratios of composite outcome, 0.57 [95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.84] if score is ?10, 0.78 [95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.07] if score is 7-9, and 0.82 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.11] if score is 4-6 versus ?3). The association was largely independent of access to care and MI severity. Individual factors related to better prognosis after MI were ideal nonsmoking, body mass index, blood pressure, and fasting glucose.Optimal Life's Simple 7 at middle age was associated with better prognosis after MI in later life. Our findings suggest a secondary prevention benefit of having better cardiovascular health status in midlife.

SUBMITTER: Mok Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5850193 | biostudies-other | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 at Middle Age and Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction in Later Life.

Mok Yejin Y Sang Yingying Y Ballew Shoshana H SH Rebholz Casey M CM Rosamond Wayne D WD Heiss Gerardo G Folsom Aaron R AR Coresh Josef J Matsushita Kunihiro K

Journal of the American Heart Association 20180217 4

<h4>Background</h4>The American Heart Association recommends focusing on 7 health factors (Life's Simple 7) for primordial prevention of cardiovascular health. However, whether greater adherence to Life's Simple 7 in midlife improves prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI) in later life is unknown.<h4>Methods and results</h4>In 1277 participants who developed MI during the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study follow-up, a 14-point score of Life's Simple 7 was constructed according ...[more]

PMID: 29455158

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveAfrican-Americans have a strikingly low prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health metrics of the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7). This study was conducted to assess the impact of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention on the knowledge and achievement of cardiovascular health metrics among a marginalized African-American community.MethodsAdult congregants (n = 37, 70 % women) from three African-American churches in Rochester, MN, participated in the Fostering African-American Improvement in Total Health (FAITH!) program, a theory-based, culturally-tailored, 16-week education series incorporating the American Heart Association's LS7 framework. Feasibility testing included assessments of participant recruitment, program attendance, and retention. We classified participants according to definitions of ideal, intermediate, and poor cardiovascular health based on cardiac risk factors and health behaviors and calculated an LS7 score (range 0 to 14) at baseline and post-intervention. Knowledge of cardiac risk factors was assessed by questionnaire. Main outcome measures were changes in cardiovascular health knowledge and cardiovascular health components related to LS7 from baseline to post-intervention. Psychosocial measures included socioeconomic status, outlook on life, self-reported health, self-efficacy, and family support.ResultsThirty-six out of 37 recruited participants completed the entire program including health assessments. Participants attended 63.5 % of the education series and attendance at each session was, on average, 62 % of those enrolled. There was a statistically significant improvement in cardiovascular health knowledge (p < 0.02). A higher percentage of participants meeting either ideal or intermediate LS7 score categories and a lower percentage within the poor category were observed. Higher LS7 scores correlated with higher psychosocial measures ratings.ConclusionsAlthough small, our study suggests that the FAITH! program is a feasible, community intervention promoting ideal cardiovascular health that has the potential to improve cardiovascular health literacy and LS7 among African-Americans.

Project description:ImportanceThe American Heart Association (AHA) introduced the Life's Simple 7 (LS7) metrics to assess and promote cardiovascular health. However, several shortcomings of these metrics have been identified. Therefore, a revised set of LS7 metrics was developed.ObjectivesTo evaluate national trends in the metrics addressed by the revised LS7 and the individual and combined associations of the revised LS7 metrics with all-cause and cause-specific mortality and to compare these measures with the AHA recommended LS7 metrics.Design, setting, and participantsThis national cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1988 to 2016. The revised LS7 metrics included a combination of the body mass index and waist to hip ratio, Healthy Eating Index-2010, and a lower blood pressure threshold of greater than or equal to 130/80 mm Hg in addition to physical activity, smoking, total cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose. Data for this study were analyzed from June 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.ResultsData were available for 13?606 adults in 1988 to 1994 (7329 [53%] female; mean [SD] age, 47 [17.7] years), 6360 in 1999 to 2004 (3442 [54%] female; mean [SD] age, 47 [18.6] years), 10?618 in 2005 to 2010 (5428 [51%] female; mean [SD] age, 47 [17.5] years), and 10?773 in 2011 to 2016 (5474 [50%] female; mean [SD] age, 48 [17.4] years). Compared with a revised LS7 score of 0 to 1, the adjusted hazard ratios for a revised LS7 score of 5 to 7 were 0.46 (95% CI, 0.35-0.61) for all-cause mortality, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25-0.68) for cancer mortality, and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.24-0.55) for CVD mortality, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios for participants who met 6 or more AHA recommended ideal LS7 metrics were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.33-0.74) for all-cause mortality, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.29-1.25) for cancer mortality, and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.13-0.47) for CVD mortality. Participants with a body mass index of 29.9 or less but without central obesity were independently associated with lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. Blood pressure was associated with 36.7% or more of the observed population-attributable fraction of mortality.Conclusions and relevanceThe individual revised LS7 metrics with modified criteria regarding weight, blood pressure, and diet provide more information about factors associated with cancer mortality than the original AHA LS7 metrics.

Dataset Information

American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 at Middle Age and Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction in Later Life.

Publications

American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 at Middle Age and Prognosis After Myocardial Infarction in Later Life.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets