Dataset Information

Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma (K(a,r)), kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X-ray equipment with built-in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a,r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators.

SUBMITTER: Wambani JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5875479 | biostudies-other | 2014 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations.

Wambani Jeska S JS Korir Geoffrey K GK Tries Mark A MA Korir Ian K IK Sakwa Jedidah M JM

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20140306 2

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma (K(a,r)), k ...[more]

PMID: 24710443

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAwareness of the harmful effects of long-term low-dose radiation is rising. Many studies have assessed both patient and physician exposure to radiation in association with the use of fluoroscopy in the operating room. However, to our knowledge, previous studies have not assessed, in a detailed fashion, the reduction in radiation exposure that pulsation and collimation provide.MethodsSeven fresh cadavers were irradiated for 5 minutes with C-arm fluoroscopy with use of standard x-ray and pulsed and collimated x-ray beams. The x-ray sources were placed under the table, over the table, and lateral to the table. Radiation exposure doses were measured at different points, such as the center of the radiation field on the cadaver as well as at the locations of the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation (a physics equation to predict exposure) was performed to estimate the dose reduction and to confirm the experimental results.ResultsThe radiation exposure doses associated with the use of pulsed fluoroscopy (8 times per second) were reduced by approximately 30% for the patient and by approximately 70% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of continuous fluoroscopy. The radiation exposure doses associated with the use of collimated beams were reduced to approximately 65% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of non-collimated fluoroscopy. These results were consistent with the simulation, and the phenomena could be appropriately explained by physics.ConclusionsThe present study revealed the effectiveness of pulsed and collimated x-ray beams in reducing radiation exposure doses resulting from C-arm fluoroscopy. Surgeons should consider using the techniques of pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation to protect patients and themselves from radiation.Clinical relevanceThis study presents data regarding the reduction of radiation exposure provided by pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation.

Project description:The frequency of hip arthroscopy for the treatment of acute and chronic chondrolabral pathology and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has increased exponentially over the past decade. While surgeon and patient radiation exposure has been well documented in other areas of the orthopaedic literature, little is known about the procedure-specific and cumulative doses affecting the hip arthroscopist.To determine the mean annual radiation exposure to the hip arthroscopist and the mean surgeon exposure per case.Case series; Level of evidence, 4.A total of 210 consecutive hip arthroscopies performed in 209 patients by a single surgeon at a single ambulatory surgical center in a cohort consisting of approximately 50% bony (cam and pincer) pathology were prospectively reviewed, documenting the specific procedures performed in each case and the readings from a radiation dosimeter worn by the surgeon during positioning and while performing the procedures. Radiation readings for deep dose-equivalent (DDE), lens dose-equivalent (LDE), and shallow dose-equivalent (SDE) were measured. These readings were compared with the annual radiation dose limit recommendations established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).The total radiation doses for the operative surgeon during all 210 cases were 183 mrem (1.83 mSv) DDE, 183 mrem (1.83 mSv) LDE, and 176 mrem (1.76 mSv) SDE. The mean exposure per case was 0.871 mrem (0.00871 mSv) DDE, 0.871 mrem (0.00871 mSv) LDE, and 0.838 mrem (0.00838 mSv) SDE. The operative surgeon's mean annual exposure, performing 70 hip arthroscopies per year with 55% involving bony work, was 61.0 mrem (0.610 mSv) DDE, 61.0 mrem (0.610 mSv) LDE, and 58.7 mrem (0.587 mSv) SDE. These results are well below the ICRP annual limits of 50,000 mrem (500 mSv) DDE, 2000 mrem (20 mSv) LDE, and 50,000 mrem (500 mSv) SDE.For an experienced hip arthroscopist utilizing fluoroscopy during setup and bony resection, the annual and per-patient exposure to radiation remains well below the recommended ICRP limits.Considering the increasing annual frequency of hip arthroscopies being performed, information regarding procedure-specific and cumulative doses of radiation exposure affecting the hip arthroscopist may provide valuable safety information for the orthopaedic community.

Project description:Fluoroscopy-induced chronic radiation dermatitis (FICRD) is a complication of fluoroscopy-guided intervention. Unlike acute radiation dermatitis, FICRD is different as delayed onset and usually appears without preexisting acute dermatitis. Unfortunately, the chronic and progressive pathology of FICRD makes it difficult to treat, and some patients need to receive wide excision and reconstruction surgery. Due to lack of standard treatment, investigating underlying mechanism is needed in order to develop an effective therapy. Herein, the Hippo pathway is specifically identified using an RNA-seq analysis in mild damaged skin specimens of patients with FICRD. Furthermore, specific increase of the Yes-associated protein (YAP1), an effector of the Hippo pathway, in skin region with mild damage plays a protective role for keratinocytes via positively regulating the numerous downstream genes involved in different biological processes. Interestingly, irradiated-keratinocytes inhibit activation of fibroblasts under TGF-β1 treatment via remote control by an exosome containing YAP1. More importantly, targeting one of YAP1 downstream genes, nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 (NR3C1), which encodes glucocorticoid receptor, has revealed its therapeutic potential to treat FICRD by inhibiting fibroblasts activation in vitro and preventing formation of radiation ulcers in a mouse model and in patients with FICRD. Taken together, this translational research demonstrates the critical role of YAP1 in FICRD and identification of a feasible, effective therapy for patients with FICRD. KEY MESSAGES: • YAP1 overexpression in skin specimens of radiation dermatitis from FICRD patient. • Radiation-induced YAP1 expression plays protective roles by promoting DNA damage repair and inhibiting fibrosis via remote control of exosomal YAP1. • YAP1 positively regulates NR3C1 which encodes glucocorticoid receptor expression. • Targeting glucocorticoid receptor by prednisolone has therapeutic potential for FICRD patient.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The perceived burden of diagnostic tests by patients during the assessment of esophageal cancer warrants attention with the current increase in repeated imaging for purposes of disease monitoring during and after treatment. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the experienced burden associated with repeated MRI and positron emission tomography with integrated CT (PET/CT) examinations during neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer from the perspective of the patient. METHODS:In 27 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer MRI and PET/CT examinations were performed before nCRT, during nCRT and before surgery. The experienced burden during repeated MRI and PET/CT examinations was evaluated with a self-report questionnaire addressing discomfort, pain, anxiety and embarrassment, each measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = none; up to 5 = very?much). In addition, a comparative assessment was used to rank MRI, PET/CT and baseline endoscopy. RESULTS:All scans were performed without the occurrence of an adverse event. Few patients experienced discomfort (mean score ±SD: 1.9 ± 1.0 for MRI vs 2.0 ± 1.0 for PET/CT, p = 0.586), pain (1.1 ± 0.4 for MRI vs 1.3 ± 0.7 for PET/CT, p = 0.059), anxiety (1.0 ± 0.2 for MRI vs 1.0 ± 0.2 for PET/CT, p = 1.000) and embarrassment (1.0 ± 0 for MRI vs 1.0 ± 0.2 for PET/CT, p = 0.317) during both MRI and PET/CT. Patients preferred MRI over PET/CT (67% vs 22%, respectively, p = 0.023), and MRI over endoscopy (59% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.027). In the comparison between PET/CT and endoscopy, 59% of patients preferred PET/CT and 26% preferred endoscopy (p = 0.093). CONCLUSION:Repeated imaging with both MRI and PET/CT is generally well-tolerated for the assessment of response to treatment in esophageal cancer patients. Shorter acquisition times and altered body positioning during scanning will likely improve patient experience. ?Advances in knowledge: This paper demonstrates that MRI and PET/CT are generally well-tolerated imaging procedures for the assessment of response to treatment in esophageal cancer patients. When asked to rank different tests, patients preferred MRI over PET/CT and endoscopy.

Dataset Information

Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations.

Publications

Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets