Dataset Information

Prostate artery embolization: a new, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement.

ABSTRACT: Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is emerging as a safe and efficacious treatment which approaches benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) from a unique perspective. This brings with it distinct advantages and solutions, which we discuss along with cost, evidence, complications and disadvantages.

SUBMITTER: Maclean D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5896862 | biostudies-other | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prostate artery embolization: a new, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement.

Maclean Drew D Maher Ben B Modi Sachin S Harris Mark M Dyer Jonathan J Somani Bhaskar B Hacking Nigel N Bryant Timothy T

Therapeutic advances in urology 20170710 8

Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is emerging as a safe and efficacious treatment which approaches benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) from a unique perspective. This brings with it distinct advantages and solutions, which we discuss along with cost, evidence, complications and disadvantages. ...[more]

PMID: 29662545

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextSeveral newer device-based procedures have recently become available for treating men with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia, but their effectiveness remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo assess the longer-term comparative effectiveness (defined as >12 mo of follow-up) of the newer treatment modalities prostatic urethral lift (PUL), transurethral prostate convective radiofrequency water vapor (Rezūm), Aquablation, and prostatic arterial embolization (PAE).Evidence acquisitionOvid Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality databases were searched through September 30, 2019; hand searches of references of relevant studies were also performed. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English language. We excluded observational studies.Evidence synthesisOne RCT (n = 91) found that patients undergoing PUL may be less likely to respond (risk ratio [RR] 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-1.0; low certainty of evidence [CoE]) and have a higher mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; mean difference 6.1; 95% CI 2.2-10.0; low CoE) than those undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Among patients undergoing PAE, one small RCT (n = 30) reported similar IPSS response rates (RR 0.9; 95% CI 0.7-1.1; low CoE) and one trial (n = 107) found similar mean IPSS (-0.7; 95% CI -1.3 to 2.7; moderate CoE) scores to those among patients undergoing TURP. A single study on Aquablation reported 12 mo of follow-up only, and a single 3-mo trial compared Rezūm with sham treatment.ConclusionsThe current best evidence underlying these newer therapies is limited to few trials (PUL and PAE), short-term follow-up of 12 mo (Aquablation and Rezūm), or sham comparison only (Rezūm).Patient summaryEvidence for four of the newer surgical treatments for men with an enlarged prostate is limited to few small trials with short-term follow-up; only one trial compared a new treatment modality with sham surgery.

Project description:BackgroundBenign prostatic enlargement (BPE) causes discomfort in daily life, including lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) caused by the enlarged prostate, and requires long-term management as a chronic, irreversible disease. To improve LUTS, certain complementary therapies have been used with or without doctors' directions. Conventional treatments and complementary therapies tend to be combined unsystematically, depending on patient preference; thus, research for safe and efficient combination therapy is warranted.MethodsTwenty-nine participants were randomly assigned to an integrative group (IG, n = 15) or a conventional group (CG, n = 14). The IG received moxibustion (twice weekly for 4 weeks, at the acupuncture points SP6, LR3, and CV4) and conventional medication for 4 weeks, followed by conventional medication alone for 8 weeks. The CG received conventional medication alone for 12 weeks. The outcome measures were International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), patient's global impression of changes (PGIC), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and frequency-volume chart.ResultsTotal IPSS (IG, -2.4 ± 4.2; CG, 0.9 ± 4.0; P = .039), PGIC-A (IG, 3.5 ± 1.0; CG, 2.2 ± 1.0; P = .001), and PGIC-B (IG, 3.5 ± 0.1; CG, 4.7 ± 0.6; P = .004) were significantly improved in the IG compared with the CG, 4 weeks after baseline. Among the IPSS items, incomplete emptying (IG, -0.6 ± 0.7; CG, 0.4 ± 1.2; P = .019), straining (IG, -0.6 ± 0.8; CG, 0.2 ± 1.2; P = .046), and nocturia (IG, -0.8 ± 1.4; CG, 0.1 ± 1.0; P = .045) showed significant differences. The Qmax and PVR volume did not differ significantly at 12 weeks after the baseline.ConclusionMoxibustion can be considered an adjunct therapy to improve LUTS in BPE patients. A full-sized randomized controlled trial would be feasible with comparator modifications and an extended study period. The study design should include a placebo group and narrow the eligibility to subjects who do not respond well to conventional treatments.

Project description:BackgroundIn men aged above 50 yr, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), benign prostate hyperplasia, and prostate cancer are common urological conditions. Current guidelines for general practitioners frequently recommend prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in patients with LUTS for the detection of prostate cancer.ObjectiveTo assess the performance of PSA, PSA density, and the Stockholm3 blood test for identification of prostate cancer among men with LUTS.Design setting and participantsIn this post hoc analysis of a population-based diagnostic trial (STHLM3, n = 58 588), 4588 men aged 50-69 yr, without previous prostate cancer, with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) data, and having PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL were identified. Men with at least moderate LUTS, defined as an IPSS score of ≥8, were included. PSA density and Stockholm3 scores were calculated.InterventionParticipants underwent 10-12-core systematic prostate biopsies.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary outcome was significant prostate cancer (sPCa) defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and previous biopsy status was performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated, and decision curve analysis was performed.Results and limitationsOut of 4588 men, 1544 (34%) reported at least moderate LUTS. The median age was 64 yr, and 11% had undergone a previous prostate biopsy. The Stockholm3 test showed superior discrimination for sPCa to PSA density, which in turn showed superior discrimination to PSA (AUC 0.77 vs 0.70 vs 0.61, p < 0.02). Calibration of the Stockholm3 test was adequate. Performing biopsy only in men with PSA ≥5 ng/mL saved 64% of biopsies, but resulted in missing 52% of detectable sPCa. Recommending biopsy for men with PSA density ≥0.07 resulted in sparing 26% of biopsy procedures and delaying the diagnosis of 12% of sPCa cases, with a 6.1% risk of sPCa among unbiopsied men. Recommending men with Stockholm3 ≥ 0.11 for biopsy resulted in sparing 53% of biopsy procedures and delaying the diagnosis of 20% of sPCa cases, with a 5.1% risk of finding sPCa in unbiopsied men.ConclusionsPSA density and the Stockholm3 blood test were superior to PSA for the identification of prostate cancer among men with LUTS.Patient summaryIn this analysis of a large Swedish study, we find that the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density or the Stockholm3 blood test instead of only PSA might improve the detection of prostate cancer among men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Dataset Information

Prostate artery embolization: a new, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement.

Publications

Prostate artery embolization: a new, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets