Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Human Abuse Potential of an Abuse-Deterrent (AD), Extended-Release (ER) Morphine Product Candidate (Morphine-ADER Injection-Molded Tablets) vs Extended-Release Morphine Administered Intranasally in Nondependent Recreational Opioid Users.


ABSTRACT: To compare the relative human abuse potential after insufflation of manipulated morphine abuse-deterrent, extended-release injection-molded tablets (morphine-ADER-IMT) with that of marketed morphine ER tablets.A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and placebo-controlled five-way crossover study was performed with adult volunteers who were experienced, nondependent, recreational opioid users. After intranasal (IN) administration of manipulated high-volume (HV) morphine-ADER-IMT (60?mg), participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive IN manipulated low-volume (LV) morphine ER (60?mg), IN manipulated LV morphine-ADER-IMT, intact oral morphine-ADER-IMT (60?mg), and placebo in crossover fashion. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments included peak effect of drug liking (E max ; primary endpoint) using drug liking visual analog scale (VAS) score, E max using overall drug liking, and take drug again (TDA) VASs scores, and mean abuse quotient (AQ), a pharmacokinetic parameter associated with drug liking.Forty-six participants completed the study. After insufflation of HV morphine-ADER-IMT and LV morphine-ADER-IMT, drug liking E max was significantly lower ( P? < ? 0.0001) compared with IN morphine ER. Overall drug liking and TDA E max values were significantly lower ( P? < ? 0.0001) after insufflation of HV morphine-ADER-IMT and LV morphine-ADER-IMT compared with IN morphine ER. Mean AQ was lower after insufflation of HV (9.2) and LV (2.3) morphine-ADER-IMT or ingestion of oral morphine-ADER-IMT (5.5) compared with insufflation of LV morphine ER (37.2).All drug liking, take drug again, and abuse quotient endpoints support a significantly lower abuse potential with insufflation of manipulated morphine-ADER-IMT compared with manipulated and insufflated non-AD ER morphine.

SUBMITTER: Webster LR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5939830 | biostudies-other | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Human Abuse Potential of an Abuse-Deterrent (AD), Extended-Release (ER) Morphine Product Candidate (Morphine-ADER Injection-Molded Tablets) vs Extended-Release Morphine Administered Intranasally in Nondependent Recreational Opioid Users.

Webster Lynn R LR   Smith Michael D MD   Lawler John J   Lindhardt Karsten K   Dayno Jeffrey M JM  

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) 20170901 9


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the relative human abuse potential after insufflation of manipulated morphine abuse-deterrent, extended-release injection-molded tablets (morphine-ADER-IMT) with that of marketed morphine ER tablets.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active- and placebo-controlled five-way crossover study was performed with adult volunteers who were experienced, nondependent, recreational opioid users. After intranasal (IN) administration of manipulated high-vo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5914361 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3812195 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5283701 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6084602 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6452577 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6974417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2803777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3909154 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3886648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6985042 | biostudies-literature