Training to Optimize Collaborative Use of an Inpatient Portal.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Hefner JL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6059853 | biostudies-other | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Publications
Training to Optimize Collaborative Use of an Inpatient Portal.
Hefner Jennifer L JL Sieck Cynthia J CJ McAlearney Ann Scheck AS
Applied clinical informatics 20180725 3
<h4>Background</h4>Inpatient portals are an emerging technology that can facilitate collaborative interactions between patients and care teams, but little is known about how organizations attempt to implement and facilitate inpatient portal use for their providers.<h4>Methods</h4>We held in-person, semistructured interviews with care team members and information technology (IT) staff and conducted rigorous thematic analysis of transcripts.<h4>Results</h4>Interviews with 220 care team members and ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe decision to use patient portals can be influenced by multiple factors, including individuals' perceptions of the tool, which are based on both their personal skills and experiences. Prior experience with one type of portal may make individuals more comfortable with using newer portal technologies. Experienced outpatient portal users in particular may have confidence in their ability to use inpatient portals that have similar functionality. In practice, the use of both outpatient and inpatient portal technologies can provide patients with continuity of access to their health information across care settings, but the influence of one type of portal use on the use of other portals has not been studied.ObjectiveThis study aims to understand how patients' use of an inpatient portal is influenced by outpatient portal use.MethodsThis study included patients from an academic medical center who were provided access to an inpatient portal during their hospital stays between 2016 and 2018 (N=1571). We analyzed inpatient portal log files to investigate how inpatient portal use varied by using 3 categories of outpatient portal users: prior users, new users, and nonusers.ResultsCompared with prior users (695/1571, 44.24%) of an outpatient portal, new users (214/1571, 13.62%) had higher use of a select set of inpatient portal functions (messaging function: incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.67; function that provides access to the outpatient portal through the inpatient portal: IRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.58). Nonusers (662/1571, 42.14%), compared with prior users, had lower overall inpatient portal use (all active functions: IRR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.78) and lower use of specific functions, which included the function to review vitals and laboratory results (IRR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.73) and the function to access the outpatient portal (IRR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45-0.62). In comparison with prior users, nonusers also had lower odds of being comprehensive users (defined as using 8 or more unique portal functions; odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.73) or composite users (defined as comprehensive users who initiated a 75th or greater percentile of portal sessions) of the inpatient portal (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60).ConclusionsPatients' use of an inpatient portal during their hospital stay appeared to be influenced by a combination of factors, including prior outpatient portal use. For new users, hospitalization itself, a major event that can motivate behavioral changes, may have influenced portal use. In contrast, nonusers might have lower self-efficacy in their ability to use technology to manage their health, contributing to their lower portal use. Understanding the relationship between the use of outpatient and inpatient portals can help direct targeted implementation strategies that encourage individuals to use these tools to better manage their health across care settings.
| S-EPMC8122294 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients have demonstrated an eagerness to use portals to access their health information and connect with care providers. While outpatient portals have been extensively studied, there is a recognized need for research that examines inpatient portals.ObjectiveWe conducted this study to improve our understanding about the role of a portal in the context of inpatient care. Our study focused on a large sample of the general adult inpatient population and obtained perspectives from both patients and care team members about inpatient portal use.MethodsWe interviewed patients (n = 120) who used an inpatient portal during their hospitalization at 15 days or 6 months after discharge to learn about their portal use. We also interviewed care team members (n = 331) 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after inpatient portal implementation to collect information about their ongoing perspectives about patients' use of the portal.ResultsThe perspectives of patients and care team members generally converged on their views of the inpatient portal. Three features-(1) ordering meals, (2) looking up health information, and (3) viewing the care team-were most commonly used; the secure messaging feature was less commonly used and of some concern to care team members. The inpatient portal benefited patients in four main ways: (1) promoted independence, (2) reduced anxiety, (3) informed families, and (4) increased empowerment.ConclusionInpatient portals are recognized as a tool that can enhance the delivery of patient-centered care. In addition to empowering patients by increasing their sense of control, inpatient portals can support family members and caregivers throughout the hospital stay. Given the consistency of perspectives about portal use across patients and care team members, our findings suggest that inpatient portals may facilitate shifts in organizational culture that increase the patient centeredness of care and improve patient experience in the hospital context.
| S-EPMC6374145 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDisadvantaged populations, including minorities and the elderly, use patient portals less often than relatively more advantaged populations. Limited access to and experience with technology contribute to these disparities. Free access to devices, the Internet, and technical assistance may eliminate disparities in portal use.ObjectiveTo examine predictors of frequent versus infrequent portal use among hospitalized patients who received free access to an iPad, the Internet, and technical assistance.Materials and methodsThis subgroup analysis includes 146 intervention-arm participants from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an inpatient portal. The participants received free access to an iPad and inpatient portal while hospitalized on medical and surgical cardiac units, together with hands-on help using them. We used logistic regression to identify characteristics predictive of frequent use.ResultsMore technology experience (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 5.39, p = 0.049), less severe illness (adjusted OR = 2.07, p = 0.077), and private insurance (adjusted OR = 2.25, p = 0.043) predicted frequent use, with a predictive performance (area under the curve) of 65.6%. No significant differences in age, gender, race, ethnicity, level of education, employment status, or patient activation existed between the frequent and infrequent users in bivariate analyses. Significantly more frequent users noticed medical errors during their hospital stay.Discussion and conclusionPortal use was not associated with several sociodemographic characteristics previously found to limit use in the inpatient setting. However, limited technology experience and high illness severity were still barriers to frequent use. Future work should explore additional strategies, such as enrolling health care proxies and improving usability, to reduce potential disparities in portal use.
| S-EPMC6335107 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Inpatient portals (IPPs) have the potential to increase patient engagement and satisfaction with their health care. An IPP provides a hospitalized patient with similar functions to those found in outpatient portals, including the ability to view vital signs, laboratory results, and medication information; schedule appointments; and communicate with their providers. However, IPPs may offer additional functions such as meal planning, real-time messaging with the inpatient care team, daily schedules, and access to educational materials relevant to their specific condition. In practice, IPPs have been developed as websites and tablet apps, with hospitals providing the required technology as a component of care during the patient's stay. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to describe how inpatients are using IPPs at the first academic medical center to implement a system-wide IPP and document the challenges and choices associated with this analytic process. METHODS:We analyzed the audit log files of IPP users hospitalized between January 2014 and January 2016. Data regarding the date/time and duration of interactions with each of the MyChart Bedside modules (eg, view lab results or medications and patient schedule) and activities (eg, messaging the provider and viewing educational videos) were captured as part of the system audit logs. The development of a construct to describe the length of time associated with a single coherent use of the tool-which we call a session-provides a foundational unit of analysis. We defined frequency as the number of sessions a patient has during a given provision day. We defined comprehensiveness in terms of the percentage of functions that an individual uses during a given provision day. RESULTS:The analytic process presented data challenges such as length of stay and tablet-provisioning factors. This study presents data visualizations to illustrate a series of data-cleaning issues. In the presence of these robust approaches to data cleaning, we present the baseline usage patterns associated with our patient panel. In addition to frequency and comprehensiveness, we present considerations of median data to mitigate the effect of outliers. CONCLUSIONS:Although other studies have published usage data associated with IPPs, most have not explicated the challenges and choices associated with the analytic approach deployed within each study. Our intent in this study was to be somewhat exhaustive in this area, in part, because replicability requires common metrics. Our hope is that future researchers in this area will avail themselves of these perspectives to engage in critical assessment moving forward.
| S-EPMC6452277 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveConduct a cluster analysis of inpatient portal (IPP) users from an academic medical center to improve understanding of who uses these portals and how.MethodsWe used 18 months of data from audit log files, which recorded IPP user actions, of 2815 patient admissions. A hierarchical clustering algorithm was executed to group patient admissions on the basis of proportion of use for each of 10 IPP features. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to further understand IPP use.ResultsFive cluster solutions were developed for the study sample. Our taxonomy included users with high levels of accessing features that were linked to reviewing schedules, results, tutorials, and ordering food. Patients tended to stay within their clusters over multiple admissions, and the clusters had differences based on patient and clinical characteristics.DiscussionDistinct groups of users exist among IPP users, suggesting that training on IPP use to enhance patient engagement could be tailored to patients. More exploration is also needed to understand why certain features were not used across all clusters.ConclusionsIt is important to understand the specifics about how patients use IPPs to help them better engage with their healthcare. Our taxonomy enabled characterization of 5 groups of IPP users who demonstrated distinct preferences. These results may inform targeted improvements to IPP tools, could provide insights to improve patient training around portal use, and may help care team members effectively engage patients in the use of IPPs. We also discuss the implications of our findings for future research.
| S-EPMC7647162 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A collaboration between clinicians and industrial engineers resulted in significant improvements in cancer screening, the development of toolkits, and more efficient care for hepatocellular carcinoma and breast, colorectal, lung, head and neck, and prostate cancers.
| S-EPMC6375583 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The foundation for integrating mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics into systems medicine is to develop standardized start-to-finish and fit-for-purpose workflows for clinical specimens. An essential step in this pursuit is to highlight common ground in a diverse landscape of different sample preparation techniques and LC-MS setups with the aim to explore differences and potential confounding factors as well as to identify areas for improvement with a direct practical benefit. With the aim to benchmark and improve current best practices among the proteomics MS laboratories of the CLINSPECT-M consortium we performed two consecutive round robin studies with full freedom to operate in terms of sample preparation and MS measurements. The six participating study partners were provided with two clinically relevant sample matrices: plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the first round each laboratory applied their current best practice protocol for the respective matrix, covering laboratory-specific sample proteolysis, liquid chromatography, and MS measurement procedure. All resulting MS files were analyzed centrally by a standardized pipeline. Based on the achieved results and following a fully transparent exchange of all lab-specific protocols within the consortium, each laboratory could improve their methods before measuring the same samples in a second acquisition round. The results of both measurement time points are compared with respect to identifications (IDs), data completeness, retention time and quantitative precision as well as inter-laboratory reproducibility. For instance, the number of identified protein groups was increased on average by 14% for CSF and 5% for plasma from first to second measurement round across participants resulting in a median overlap number of 579 protein groups for CSF and 246 IDs for plasma across setups. The individual performances of participating study centers and the inter-laboratory reproducibility were improved in the second measurement, emphasizing the effect and importance of expert-driven exchange of best practices. In total, the study not only clearly demonstrates the beneficial effect of sharing knowledge and expertise for direct practical improvements but also highlights tendencies such as common limits of detection or preferable preparation strategies.
2024-01-02 | PXD044053 | Pride
Project description:BackgroundMethamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is associated with executive dysfunctions, which are linked with poorer treatment outcomes including earlier drop out and relapse. However, current treatments for MUD do not address executive functions. Goal Management Training (GMT) is an evidence-based cognitive remediation program for executive dysfunction, although required modifications to enhance its relevance and application within addiction treatment settings. This study aimed to (1) tailor GMT to the key cognitive deficits and typical treatment duration of MUD; (2) explore consumers' (people with MUD) engagement with the revised program; (3) implement a prototype of the program with consumers; and (4) present the manualized standard administration to clinical service providers.MethodsWe followed the Medical Research Council Complex Interventions Framework and employed an evidence- and person-based intervention development process. We used a four-phased approach and collaborated with neuropsychology experts, design researchers in healthcare, consumers with MUD, and clinical service providers. Each aim was addressed in a separate study phase; including content refinement and review with neuropsychology experts (phase 1), intervention design and collaboration with consumers (phase 2), prototype development and review with consumers (phase 3), and final program modifications and review with clinical stakeholders (phase 4).ResultsFindings from phase 1 indicated support for targeting four cognitive processes (attention, impulse control, goal setting, and decision-making). Key feedback included the need to help habitualize cognitive strategies and to guide consumers in applying these strategies in emotionally salient situations. Findings from phases 2 and 3 indicated consumer support for the program strategies and materials but highlighted the need to further enhance the personal relevance of specific content and journal activities. Findings from phase 4 provided clinicians support for the revised program but indicated an opportunity to minimize unintended effects. We present the intervention materials for the final revised program, Goal Management Training+ (GMT+), in line with TIDieR guidelines.ConclusionsGMT+ targets key cognitive processes and is sensitive to the clinical needs of people with MUD. Our intervention development process was important for informing the active ingredients and materials for GMT+, and indicated initial consumer and provider acceptability prior to conducting a clinical trial.
| S-EPMC9082590 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Community health education improves members health-seeking and utilization behaviours. To enhance the community knowledge and optimize the use of Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), we carried out a community training in Kamuli District, Uganda. The Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) model was adopted. A total of 3420 community members were trained, 384 sampled to participate in pre-post-test assessment, with 76 healthcare workers (HCW). Community members were sampled by simple random sampling while the HCW were purposively selected. Community trainings occurred for two days at each of 42 public health facilities and one day at 27 parishes. A paired sample t-test and effect size was computed to establish effect with statistical significance tested at p < 0.05. Overall, a total of 3496 participants, majority 2705 (77.4%) females were trained. A total of 3420 community members, majority 2659 (77.7%) females trained, and 76 HCW, majority 46 (60.5%) females trained. The median age of community participants was 32 years, and interquartile range (IQR) = 17 years. The median age of HCW was 32 years, and IQR = 8 years. The training had a positive and significant effect on the community members knowledge: malaria transmission (T-test = 9.359; p < 0.0001) causes of malaria (T-test = 6.738; p < 0.0001), malaria symptoms (T-test = 5.403; p < 0.0001), dangerous malaria species (T-test = 12.088; p < 0.0001), Plasmodium vivax malaria cycle and occurrence every 48 h (T-test = 7.470; p < 0.0001), assessing whether a patient with malaria may suffer from jaundice (T-test = 7.228; p < 0.0001), organs affected by Plasmodium falciparum (T-test = 12.214; p < 0.0001), malaria diagnosis (T-test = 9.765; p < 0.0001), Plasmodium associated with malaria relapse (T-test = 10.250; p < 0.0001), and malaria prevention and control (T-test = 9.278; p < 0.0001). The intervention also had a significant and positive effect on HCW knowledge on all domains except on malaria transmission (T-test = 1.217; p = 0.228) where it didn't have any statistically significant increase on their knowledge. The education intervention improved the knowledge of participants significantly. There is need to adopt and scale-up the current intervention at all levels of care to enhance proper use of medicines.
| S-EPMC11290100 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The foundation for integrating mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics into systems medicine is the development of standardized start-to-finish and fit-for-purpose workflows for clinical specimens. An essential step in this pursuit is to highlight the common ground in a diverse landscape of different sample preparation techniques and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) setups. With the aim to benchmark and improve the current best practices among the proteomics MS laboratories of the CLINSPECT-M consortium, we performed two consecutive round-robin studies with full freedom to operate in terms of sample preparation and MS measurements. The six study partners were provided with two clinically relevant sample matrices: plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the first round, each laboratory applied their current best practice protocol for the respective matrix. Based on the achieved results and following a transparent exchange of all lab-specific protocols within the consortium, each laboratory could advance their methods before measuring the same samples in the second acquisition round. Both time points are compared with respect to identifications (IDs), data completeness, and precision, as well as reproducibility. As a result, the individual performances of participating study centers were improved in the second measurement, emphasizing the effect and importance of the expert-driven exchange of best practices for direct practical improvements.
| S-EPMC10775142 | biostudies-literature