Dataset Information

Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Chemotherapy for Stage II-IIIA Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Radical Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Small Sample Size.

ABSTRACT: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and conventional chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical surgery.A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC from Subei People's Hospital and Yangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital in Yangzhou City of Jiangsu Province from 2012 to 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: the TCM user group (patients receiving treatment with integrated TCM and conventional chemotherapy) and the non-TCM user group (patients receiving conventional chemotherapy only). The two groups were compared for their median disease-free survival (DFS) and median overall survival (OS).A total of 67 patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC were enrolled between January 2012 and December 2016. The median DFS for the non-TCM user group was 601 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 375.7-826.3). The median DFS for TCM user group could not be calculated. However, log-rank analysis showed that the median survival time in the TCM user group was significantly longer than that of the non-TCM user group (P < 0.05). In addition, several significant risk factors were detected for predicting disease prognosis in patients with NSCLC, such as age, ECOG, lymphatic metastasis, and body mass index (BMI). For patients harboring these independent risk factors, the DFS of TCM user group was much longer than that of non-TCM user group (P < 0.05).Adjuvant therapy with TCM may reduce the rate of tumor recurrence and metastasis and prolong DFS of patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC.

SUBMITTER: Zhao X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6083736 | biostudies-other | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Chemotherapy for Stage II-IIIA Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Radical Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Small Sample Size.

Zhao Xueyu X Dai Xiaojun X Wang Shanshan S Yang Ting T Yan Yan Y Zhu Guang G Feng Jun J Pan Bo B Sunagawa Masataka M Zhang Xiaochun X Qian Yayun Y Liu Yanqing Y

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM 20180725

<h4>Objective</h4>This study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and conventional chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC from Subei People's Hospital and Yangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital in Yangzhou City of Jiangsu Province from 2012 to ...[more]

PMID: 30147731

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe sought to determine the perioperative safety and feasibility outcomes of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsThe clinical details of patients who attended the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Eligible patients had pathologically proven stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC and were randomly prescribed neoadjuvant therapy. Those in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group received two cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) and those in the control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin). All patients were scheduled to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was the risk of major complications within 30 days of surgery and the secondary endpoints were interval to surgery and 30-day mortality.ResultsA total of 107 eligible patients were evaluated of whom 25 were allocated to the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group and 82 to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The median interval to surgery was similar in the two groups at 29.2 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.1 to 31.4 days] in the immunotherapy group and 28.7 days (95% CI, 27.6 to 29.8 days) in the chemotherapy group (P=0.656). While treatment-related adverse events were reported in most patients, all 25 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 80 of 82 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although one patient in the latter group died within 30 days of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the probability of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery (P=0.757).ConclusionsMost patients achieved the primary and secondary endpoints of the study. However, the major pathological response (MPR) showed statistically significant differences between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups.

Project description:ObjectiveConcern exists regarding surgery after thoracic radiation. We aimed to assess early results of anatomic resection following induction therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy and full-dose thoracic radiation for resectable N2+ stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsTwo prospective trials were recently conducted by NRG Oncology in patients with resectable N2+ stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with the primary end point of mediastinal node sterilization following concurrent full-dose chemoradiotherapy (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials 0229 and 0839). All surgeons demonstrated postinduction resection expertise. Induction consisted of weekly carboplatin (area under the curve, 2.0) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and concurrent thoracic radiation 60 Gy (0839)/61.2 Gy (0229) in 30 fractions. Patients in study 0839 were randomized 2:1 to weekly panitumumab + chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone during induction. Primary results were similar in all treatment arms and reported previously. Short-term surgical outcomes are reported here.ResultsOne hundred twenty-six patients enrolled; 93 (74%) had anatomic resection, 77 underwent lobectomy, and 16 underwent extended resection. Microscopically margin-negative resections occurred in 85 (91%). Fourteen (15%) resections were attempted minimally invasively, including 2 converted without event. Grade 3 or 4 surgical adverse events were reported in 26 (28%), 30-day mortality in 4 (4%) and 90-day mortality in 5 (5%). Patients undergoing extended resection experienced similar rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-3.8) but higher 30-day (1.3% vs 18.8%) (odds ratio, 17.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-181.8) and 90-day mortality (2.6% vs 18.8%) (odds ratio, 8.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-56.9).ConclusionsLobectomy was performed safely following full-dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy in these multi-institutional prospective trials; however, increased mortality was noted with extended resections.

Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery all have significant roles in the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery has shown encouraging efficacy for resectable SCLC with a good tolerability and considerable survival benefit. However, there are still few data on whether surgery for stage I-IIIA SCLC can be performed after immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC in the hope of adding new ideas to the treatment of SCLC.MethodsThe study group comprised 19 patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy between 2019 and 2021. Patients received 2-4 cycles of immunotherapy combined with platinum-containing dual-drug chemotherapy (platinum + paclitaxel) before surgery. Imaging evaluation was performed every two cycles until surgery. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant treatment related adverse events, perioperative and postoperative complications, surgical resection rate, and degree of tumor regression were evaluated. We obtained follow-up data from the patients' regular examination or treatment in hospital. If we can't complete it, contacting patients by telephone or WeChat would be adopted by us. The follow-up was not terminated until 3 months after surgery.ResultsThe objective response rate (ORR) was 84.2% (16/19), and no patients had progressive disease (PD). Of the 10 patients who underwent surgery, and approximately 9 (90.0%) had R0 resection. There were no perioperative deaths, and 1 case of pyothorax. The rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 30.0% (3/10), and 40.0% (4/10) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse reactions comprised 1 case of anemia and 1 case of constipation.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC is effective and safe with a high ORR and MPR rate, as well as a high R0 resection rate and a tolerable toxicity profile. Whether this regimen gives a survival benefit should be confirmed by further follow-up and larger, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.

Dataset Information

Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Chemotherapy for Stage II-IIIA Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Radical Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Small Sample Size.

Publications

Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated with Chemotherapy for Stage II-IIIA Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Radical Surgery: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Small Sample Size.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets