Dataset Information

The glucocorticoid receptor and cortisol levels in pediatric septic shock.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:There is controversy around the prescription of adjunct corticosteroids in patients with fluid-refractory septic shock, and studies provide mixed results, showing benefit, no benefit, and harm. Traditional means for evaluating whether a patient receives corticosteroids relied on anecdotal experience or measurement of serum cortisol production following stimulation. We set out to measure both serum cortisol and the intracellular signaling receptor for cortisol, the glucocorticoid receptor (GCR), in this group of patients. METHODS:We enrolled pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with a diagnosis of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, or septic shock as well as healthy controls. We measured serum cortisol concentration and GCR expression by flow cytometry in peripheral blood leukocytes on the day of admission and day 3. RESULTS:We enrolled 164 patients for analysis. There was no difference between GCR expression comparing SIRS, sepsis, and septic shock. When all patients with septic shock were compared, those patients with a complicated course, defined as two or more organ failures at day 7 or death by day 28, had lower expression of GCR in all peripheral blood leukocytes. Further analysis suggested that patients with the combination of low GCR and high serum cortisol had higher rates of complicated course (75%) compared with the other three possible combinations of GCR and cortisol levels: low GCR and low cortisol (33%), high GCR and high cortisol (33%), and high GCR and low cortisol (13%; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS:We show that decreased expression of the GCR correlated with poor outcome from septic shock, particularly in those patients with high serum cortisol. This is consistent with findings from transcriptional studies showing that downregulation of GCR signaling genes portends worse outcome.

SUBMITTER: Alder MN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6162875 | biostudies-other | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The glucocorticoid receptor and cortisol levels in pediatric septic shock.

Alder Matthew N MN Opoka Amy M AM Wong Hector R HR

Critical care (London, England) 20180929 1

<h4>Background</h4>There is controversy around the prescription of adjunct corticosteroids in patients with fluid-refractory septic shock, and studies provide mixed results, showing benefit, no benefit, and harm. Traditional means for evaluating whether a patient receives corticosteroids relied on anecdotal experience or measurement of serum cortisol production following stimulation. We set out to measure both serum cortisol and the intracellular signaling receptor for cortisol, the glucocortico ...[more]

PMID: 30268145

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveCortisol clearance is reduced in sepsis and may contribute to the development of impaired adrenocortical function that is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. We sought to assess adrenocortical function using computer-assisted numerical modeling methodology to characterize and compare maximal cortisol secretion rate and free cortisol half-life in septic shock, sepsis, and healthy control subjects.DesignPost hoc analysis of previously published total cortisol, free cortisol, corticosteroid-binding globulin, and albumin concentration data.SettingSingle academic medical center.PatientsSubjects included septic shock (n = 45), sepsis (n = 25), and healthy controls (n = 10).InterventionsI.v. cosyntropin (250 μg).Measurements and main resultsSolutions for maximal cortisol secretion rate and free cortisol half-life were obtained by least squares solution of simultaneous, nonlinear differential equations that account for free cortisol appearance and elimination as well as reversible binding to corticosteroid-binding globulin and albumin. Maximal cortisol secretion rate was significantly greater in septic shock (0.83 nM/s [0.44, 1.58 nM/s] reported as median [lower quartile, upper quartile]) compared with sepsis (0.51 nM/s [0.36, 0.62 nM/s]; p = 0.007) and controls (0.49 nM/s [0.42, 0.62 nM/s]; p = 0.04). The variance of maximal cortisol secretion rate in septic shock was also greater than that of sepsis or control groups (F test, p < 0.001). Free cortisol half-life was significantly increased in septic shock (4.6 min [2.2, 6.3 min]) and sepsis (3.0 min [2.3, 4.8 min] when compared with controls (2.0 min [1.2, 2.6 min]) (both p < 0.004).ConclusionsResults obtained by numerical modeling are consistent with comparable measures obtained by the gold standard stable isotope dilution method. Septic shock is associated with generally not only higher levels but also greater variance of maximal cortisol secretion rate when compared with control and sepsis groups. Additional studies would be needed to determine whether assessment of cortisol kinetic parameters such as maximal cortisol secretion rate and free cortisol half-life is useful in the diagnosis or management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Corticosteroid regimens that stimulate both mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid pathways consistently reverse vasopressor-dependent hypotension in septic shock but have variable effects on survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether exogenous mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid treatments have distinct effects and whether the timing of administration alters their effects in septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Desoxycorticosterone, a selective mineralocorticoid agonist; dexamethasone, a selective glucocorticoid agonist; and placebo were administered either several days before (prophylactic) or immediately after (therapeutic) infectious challenge and continued for 96 hrs in 74 canines with staphylococcal pneumonia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Effects of desoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone were different and opposite depending on timing of administration for survival (p = .05); fluid requirements (p = .05); central venous pressures (p ? .007); indicators of hemoconcentration (i.e., sodium [p = .0004], albumin [p = .05], and platelet counts [p = .02]); interleukin-6 levels (p = .04); and cardiac dysfunction (p = .05). Prophylactic desoxycorticosterone treatment significantly improved survival, shock, and all the other outcomes stated, but therapeutic desoxycorticosterone did not. Conversely, prophylactic dexamethasone was much less effective for improving these outcomes compared with therapeutic dexamethasone with the exception of shock reversal. Prophylactic dexamethasone given before sepsis induction also significantly reduced serum aldosterone and cortisol levels and increased body temperature and lactate levels compared with therapeutic dexamethasone (p ? .05), consistent with adrenal suppression. CONCLUSIONS:In septic shock, mineralocorticoids are only beneficial if given prophylactically, whereas glucocorticoids are most beneficial when given close to the onset of infection. Prophylactic mineralocorticoids should be further investigated in patients at high risk to develop sepsis, whereas glucocorticoids should only be administered therapeutically to prevent adrenal suppression and worse outcomes.

Dataset Information

The glucocorticoid receptor and cortisol levels in pediatric septic shock.

Publications

The glucocorticoid receptor and cortisol levels in pediatric septic shock.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets