Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Real-world analysis of cost, health care resource utilization, and supportive care in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with frontline failure.


ABSTRACT: Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic burden of frontline failure (FLF) among classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients during and after treatment. Patients and methods:The population consisted of adult HL patients identified from January 2010 through September 2015 without any other primary cancer prior to HL diagnosis, who also had a frontline (FL) regimen indicative of curative intent. Patients were characterized as FLF (those who restart, switch to any chemotherapy; had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant; or newly initiated radiation therapy [RT] after discontinuing FL) or non-FLF (those not considered as FLF). Direct health care utilization and expenditures were measured over both fixed and variable length follow-up periods and during FL therapy. Results:There were 77 FLF and 602 non-FLF patients who met the final inclusion criteria. FLF and non-FLF patients were demographically similar with mean age 38.5 years and 47.5% females. Average per patient per month (PPPM) costs were significantly higher for FLF patients during all follow-up (US$20,266 vs US$7,772, P<0.05). Annual total expenditures were significantly higher among FLF patients (US$198,388) vs non-FLF patients (US$37,549). FLF (vs non-FLF) patients had a significantly shorter duration of FL therapy (116 vs 131 days, P=0.024) and higher total PPPM expenditures during FL (US$29,040 vs US$16,369, P<0.05). Annual cost varied by failure type with those who failed due to restart incurring the highest cost (US$269,189) and those who switched incurring the lowest cost (US$46,951). FLF patients had a significantly greater utilization in every health care resource category during follow-up. Conclusion:FLF (vs non-FLF) patients utilized substantially more health care resources and incurred a substantially higher economic burden. Over 5 years, FLF patients with at least two lines of treatment were projected to incur US$535,846 of health care costs. Further research is needed to determine optimal treatment that could reduce the risk of progression, need for treatment after FL, and enhance long-term clinical and economic outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Bonafede M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6198880 | biostudies-other | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Real-world analysis of cost, health care resource utilization, and supportive care in Hodgkin lymphoma patients with frontline failure.

Bonafede Machaon M   Feliciano Joseph J   Cai Qian Q   Noxon Virginia V   Princic Nicole N   Richhariya Akshara A   Straus David J DJ  

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR 20181017


<h4>Purpose</h4>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic burden of frontline failure (FLF) among classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients during and after treatment.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>The population consisted of adult HL patients identified from January 2010 through September 2015 without any other primary cancer prior to HL diagnosis, who also had a frontline (FL) regimen indicative of curative intent. Patients were characterized as FLF (those who restart, switch to any  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8805609 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9820976 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7656920 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8395392 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6775599 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5711258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4254868 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10092365 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8100570 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8589905 | biostudies-literature