Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To assess the role of registries in the postmarketing surveillance of surgical meshes. BACKGROUND:To date, surgical meshes are classified as group II medical devices. Class II devices do not require premarket clearance by clinical studies. Ethicon initiated a voluntary market withdrawal of Physiomesh for laparoscopic use after an analysis of unpublished data from the 2 large independent hernia registries-Herniamed German Registry and Danish Hernia Database. This paper now presents the relevant data from the Herniamed Registry. METHODS:The present analysis compares the prospective perioperative and 1-year follow-up data collected for all patients with incisional hernia who had undergone elective laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair either with Physiomesh (n = 1380) or with other meshes recommended in the guidelines (n = 3834). RESULTS:Patients with Physiomesh repair had a markedly higher recurrence rate compared with the other recommended meshes (12.0% vs 5.0%; P < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the recurrence rate was highly significantly influenced by the mesh type used (P < 0.001). If Physiomesh was used, that led to a highly significant increase in the recurrence rate on 1-year follow-up (odds ratio 2.570, 95% CI 2.057, 3.210). The mesh type used also had a significant influence on chronic pain rates. CONCLUSIONS:The importance of real-world data for postmarketing surveillance of surgical meshes has been demonstrated in this registry-based study. Randomized controlled trials are needed for premarket approval of new devices. The role of sponsorship of device studies by the manufacturing company must be taken into account.

SUBMITTER: Kockerling F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6250300 | biostudies-other | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

The Importance of Registries in the Postmarketing Surveillance of Surgical Meshes.

Köckerling Ferdinand F   Simon Thomas T   Hukauf Martin M   Hellinger Achim A   Fortelny Rene R   Reinpold Wolfgang W   Bittner Reinhard R  

Annals of surgery 20181201 6


<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the role of registries in the postmarketing surveillance of surgical meshes.<h4>Background</h4>To date, surgical meshes are classified as group II medical devices. Class II devices do not require premarket clearance by clinical studies. Ethicon initiated a voluntary market withdrawal of Physiomesh for laparoscopic use after an analysis of unpublished data from the 2 large independent hernia registries-Herniamed German Registry and Danish Hernia Database. This paper no  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10491550 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7965839 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3848407 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3388071 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8692576 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5098080 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4898160 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7988650 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9579417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7393507 | biostudies-literature