Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Literature on persuasion suggests compliance increases when requests are accompanied with a reason (i.e. the "because-heuristic"). The reliability of outcomes in physical activity research is dependent on sufficient accelerometer wear-time. This study tested whether SMS reminders-especially those that provided a rationale-are associated with increased accelerometer wear-time. METHODS:We conducted a within-trial partially randomised controlled trial during baseline data collection in a school-based physical activity intervention trial. Of 375 participants (mean age?=?18.1), 280 (75%) opted to receive daily SMS reminders to wear their accelerometers. These 280 participants were then randomised to receive either succinct reminders or reminders including a rationale. Data was analyzed across groups using both frequentist and Bayesian methods. RESULTS:No differences in total accelerometer wear minutes were detected between the succinct reminder group (Mdn?=?4909, IQR?=?3429-5857) and the rationale group (Mdn?=?4808, IQR?=?3571-5743); W?=?8860, p?=?0.65, CI95?=?-?280.90-447.20. Similarly, we found no differences in wear time between participants receiving SMS reminders (Mdn?=?4859, IQR?=?3527-5808) and those not receiving them (Mdn?=?5067, IQR?=?3201-5885); W?=?10,642.5, p?=?0.77, CI95?=?-?424.20-305.30. Bayesian ANOVA favored a model of equal weartime means, over one of unequal means, by a Bayes Factor of 12.05. Accumulated days of valid accelerometer wear data did not differ either. Equivalence testing indicated rejection of effects more extreme than a Cohen's d (standardised mean difference) of ±~0.3. CONCLUSIONS:This study casts doubt on the effectiveness of using the because-heuristic via SMS messaging, to promote accelerometer wear time among youth. The because-heuristic might be limited to face-to-face communication and situations where no intention for or commitment to the behavior has yet been made. Other explanations for null effects include non-reading of messages, and reminder messages undermining the self-reminding strategies which would occur naturally in the absence of reminders. TRIAL REGISTRATION:DRKS DRKS00007721 . Registered 14.04.2015. Retrospectively registered.

SUBMITTER: Heino MTJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6286544 | biostudies-other | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

altmetric image

Publications

Simple and rationale-providing SMS reminders to promote accelerometer use: a within-trial randomised trial comparing persuasive messages.

Heino Matti T J MTJ   Knittle Keegan K   Haukkala Ari A   Vasankari Tommi T   Hankonen Nelli N  

BMC public health 20181207 1


<h4>Background</h4>Literature on persuasion suggests compliance increases when requests are accompanied with a reason (i.e. the "because-heuristic"). The reliability of outcomes in physical activity research is dependent on sufficient accelerometer wear-time. This study tested whether SMS reminders-especially those that provided a rationale-are associated with increased accelerometer wear-time.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a within-trial partially randomised controlled trial during baseline data  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5932834 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5553566 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4859823 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4077718 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9251622 | biostudies-literature
| 2665216 | ecrin-mdr-crc
| S-EPMC6626331 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4490665 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5561370 | biostudies-literature