Dataset Information

Association of PPARGC1A Gly428Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism with potential for athletic ability and sports performance: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Genetics plays a role in determining potential for athletic ability (AA) and sports performance (SP). In this study, AA involves comparing sedentary controls with competitive athletes in power and endurance activities as well as a mix between the two (SP). However, variable results from genetic association studies warrant a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates of the association between PPARGC1A Gly482Ser polymorphism and AA/SP. METHODS:Multi-database literature search yielded 14 articles (16 studies) for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate associations. Summary effects were modified based on statistical power. Subgroup analysis was based on SP (power, endurance and mixed) and race (Caucasians and Asians). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 metric and its sources examined with outlier analysis which dichotomized our findings into pre- (PRO) and post-outlier (PSO). RESULTS:Gly allele effects significantly favoring AA/SP (OR > 1.0, P < 0.05) form the core of our findings in: (i) homogeneous overall effect at the post-modified, PSO level (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%); (ii) initially homogeneous power SP (ORs 1.22-1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.44, P = 0.003-0.008, I2 = 0%) which precluded outlier treatment; (iii) PRO Caucasian outcomes (ORs 1.29-1.32, 95% CI 1.12-1.54, P = 0.0005) over that of Asians with a pooled null effect (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.72-1.99, P = 0.53-0.92) and (iv) homogeneous all > 80% (ORs 1.19-1.38, 95% CI 1.05-1.66, P = 0.0007-0.007, I2 = 0%) on account of high statistical power (both study-specific and combined). In contrast, none of the Ser allele effects significantly favored AA/SP and no Ser-Gly genotype outcome favored AA/SP. The core significant outcomes were robust and showed no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION:Meta-analytical applications in this study generated evidence that show association between the Gly allele and AA/SP. These were observed in the overall, Caucasians and statistically powered comparisons which exhibited consistent significance, stability, robustness, precision and lack of bias. Our central findings rest on association of the Gly allele with endurance and power, differentially favoring the latter over the former.

SUBMITTER: Tharabenjasin P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6326506 | biostudies-other | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association of PPARGC1A Gly428Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism with potential for athletic ability and sports performance: A meta-analysis.

Tharabenjasin Phuntila P Pabalan Noel N Jarjanazi Hamdi H

PloS one 20190109 1

<h4>Background</h4>Genetics plays a role in determining potential for athletic ability (AA) and sports performance (SP). In this study, AA involves comparing sedentary controls with competitive athletes in power and endurance activities as well as a mix between the two (SP). However, variable results from genetic association studies warrant a meta-analysis to obtain more precise estimates of the association between PPARGC1A Gly482Ser polymorphism and AA/SP.<h4>Methods</h4>Multi-database literatu ...[more]

PMID: 30625151

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe special status accorded to elite athletes stems from their uncommon genetic potential to excel in world-class power sports (PS). Genetic polymorphisms have been reported to influence elite PS status. Reports of associations between the α-actinin-3 gene (ACTN3) R577X polymorphism and PS have been inconsistent. In light of new published studies, we perform a meta-analysis to further explore the roles of this polymorphism in PS performance among elite athletes.MethodsMulti-database literature search yielded 44 studies from 38 articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used in estimating associations (significance threshold was set at Pa ≤ 0.05) using the allele-genotype model (R and X alleles, RX genotype). Outlier analysis was used to examine its impact on association and heterogeneity outcomes. Subgroup analysis was race (Western and Asian) and gender (male/female)-based. Interaction tests were applied to differential outcomes between the subgroups, P-values of which were Bonferroni corrected (Pinteraction BC). Tests for sensitivity and publication bias were performed.ResultsSignificant overall R allele effects (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.37, Pa = 0.002) were confirmed in the Western subgroup (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, Pa = 0.02) and with outlier treatment (ORs 1.12-1.20, 95% CIs 1.02-1.30, Pa < 10-5-0.01). This treatment resulted in acquired significance of the RX effect in Asian athletes (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.92, Pa = 0.003). Gender analysis dichotomized the RX genotype and R allele effects as significantly higher in male (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, Pa = 0.02) and female (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.06, Pa = 0.0009) athletes, respectively, when compared with controls. Significant R female association was improved with a test of interaction (Pinteraction BC = 0.03). The overall, Asian and female outcomes were robust. The R allele results were more robust than the RX genotype outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was found.ConclusionsIn this meta-analysis, we present clear associations between the R allele/RX genotype in the ACTN3 polymorphism and elite power athlete status. Significant effects of the R allele (overall analysis, Western and female subgroups) and RX genotype (Asians and males) were for the most part, results of outlier treatment. Interaction analysis improved the female outcome. These robust findings were free of publication bias.

Project description:BackgroundCore stability training has grown in popularity over 25 years, initially for back pain prevention or therapy. Subsequently, it developed as a mode of exercise training for health, fitness and sport. The scientific basis for traditional core stability exercise has recently been questioned and challenged, especially in relation to dynamic athletic performance. Reviews have called for clarity on what constitutes anatomy and function of the core, especially in healthy and uninjured people. Clinical research suggests that traditional core stability training is inappropriate for development of fitness for heath and sports performance. However, commonly used methods of measuring core stability in research do not reflect functional nature of core stability in uninjured, healthy and athletic populations. Recent reviews have proposed a more dynamic, whole body approach to training core stabilization, and research has begun to measure and report efficacy of these modes training. The purpose of this study was to assess extent to which these developments have informed people currently working and participating in sport.MethodsAn online survey questionnaire was developed around common themes on core stability training as defined in the current scientific literature and circulated to a sample population of people working and participating in sport. Survey results were assessed against key elements of the current scientific debate.ResultsPerceptions on anatomy and function of the core were gathered from a representative cohort of athletes, coaches, sports science and sports medicine practitioners (n = 241), along with their views on effectiveness of various current and traditional exercise training modes. Most popular method of testing and measuring core function was subjective assessment through observation (43%), while a quarter (22%) believed there was no effective method of measurement. Perceptions of people in sport reflect the scientific debate, and practitioners have adopted a more functional approach to core stability training. There was strong support for loaded, compound exercises performed upright, compared to moderate support for traditional core stability exercises. Half of the participants (50%) in the survey, however, still support a traditional isolation core stability training.ConclusionPerceptions in applied practice on core stability training for dynamic athletic performance are aligned to a large extent to the scientific literature.

Project description:BackgroundPsychological interventions are commonly applied in sports to help athletes enhance their performance, but the effect psychological interventions have on actual performance is unclear despite decades of research.ObjectiveWe conducted a systematic review with meta-analyses to investigate the effects of a wide range of psychological interventions on performance in competitive athletes.MethodsA study protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO, and a literary search was performed in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus databases. Psychological intervention studies were eligible by using a group design and a quantitative performance outcome with athletes competing at a regional or university level or higher. Included studies were assessed regarding intervention characteristics, research methodology, and risk of bias. A multi-level meta-analysis framework with cluster robust variance estimation was used to quantitatively synthesize the results.ResultsA total of 111 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 25 of these studies (37 effects) could be synthesized into five meta-analyses in which there were similarities in the type of psychological intervention, comparator, and experimental design. Meta-analyses I (multimodal psychological skills training vs control), II (mindfulness- and acceptance-based approaches vs control), and III (imagery vs control) consisted of parallel-group studies, and random-effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference. Meta-analyses IV (attentional focus strategies, external vs internal) and V (regulatory focus performance instructions, prevention vs promotion) consisted of counterbalanced crossover design studies, and random-effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean change using change score standardization. Significant results were found in three of the meta-analyses (I, II, and III). Psychological skills training (g = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.21-1.45), mindfulness- and acceptance-based approaches (g = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.01-1.32), and imagery (g = 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.14-1.36) outperformed controls with moderate effects. However, when non-randomized trials and subjective performance outcomes were removed in sensitivity analyses, the overall estimates of the effect size were no longer significant in any of the syntheses.ConclusionsThe significant moderate effects for psychological skills training, mindfulness- and acceptance-based approaches, and imagery are not stable, and further trials with robust research methodology, such as randomized controlled trials, are requested for all types of psychological interventions aiming to enhance performance in athletes. Moreover, improved reporting standards and the provision of datasets in open science repositories are important to consider in future trials in sport psychology.Clinical trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42017056677.

Project description:BackgroundStimulant medications used for the treatment of Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are believed to provide a physical advantage in athletics, but several of these medications are not regulated by the World Anti-Doping Association. Given the prevalence of ADHD among the athlete population and concern for abuse of ADHD medications, this review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate effects of ADHD medications on athletic performance, thereby appraising the validity of claims of performance enhancement.MethodsA search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Review databases was performed for all randomized controlled trials evaluating athletic performance after ingestion of placebo or ADHD treatment medications from August 2020 through November 2020. All RCTs identified from these search criteria were included for screening, with exclusion of any animal studies. Two reviewers (JB, CK) assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using CONSORT 2010 and Cochrane Collaboration tools. Study results were compiled with corresponding p values for each finding. Effect sizes (Cohen's D) for athletic performance and physiological changes were aggregated for each study. Studies were further screened for homogeneity that would allow for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was calculated using I2.ResultsA total of 13,033 abstracts evaluating amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, and bupropion were screened. The final analysis included nine studies, six of which found significant improvement in athletic performance with use of stimulant medications (p < 0.05). Methylphenidate and amphetamine were consistently identified to have a performance effect. Secondary effects identified included significant increase in heart rate, core temperature, and elevation of various serum hormone levels (p < 0.05). Effect size evaluation found seven studies demonstrating small to large effects on physical performance, as well as in categories of cardiometabolic, temperature, hormone, and ratings of perceived exertion, to varying degrees. A meta-analysis was performed on two studies, demonstrating conflicting results.ConclusionsDopaminergic/noradrenergic agonist medications appear to have a positive effect on athletic performance, as well as effects on physiological parameters. Further consideration of medications currently not regulated, i.e. bupropion, is warranted given evidence of athletic performance enhancement. PROSPERO trial registration number: CRD42020211062; 10/29/2020 retrospectively registered.

Dataset Information

Association of PPARGC1A Gly428Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism with potential for athletic ability and sports performance: A meta-analysis.

Publications

Association of PPARGC1A Gly428Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism with potential for athletic ability and sports performance: A meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets