Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation coronary computed tomography angiography with low tube voltage and knowledge-based model reconstruction.


ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with a low-radiation protocol and iterative model reconstruction (IMR), in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Sixty-one patients (45 males; mean age, 61.9?±?9.2 years) with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA and ICA were retrospectively enrolled. CCTA was performed with low tube voltage (80 or 100 kVp), low tube current (100-200 mAs), prospective ECG triggering, and IMR using a 64-slice computed tomography scanner. Coronary artery disease was defined as luminal narrowing of >50%, as assessed using CCTA and ICA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive value, and accuracy of CCTA were examined. The mean radiation dose of CCTA was 1.05?±?0.36?mSv. No non-diagnostic segment was noted. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CCTA were 86.4%, 96.1%, 80.3%, 97.5%, and 94.6% on a per segment basis, 93.1%, 94.7%, 88.3%, 97.0%, and 94.2% on a per vessel basis, and 100%, 83.3%, 93.5%, 100%, and 95.1% on a per patient basis, respectively. In conclusion, a low-radiation CCTA protocol with IMR may be useful for diagnosing coronary artery disease, as it reduces the radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

SUBMITTER: Lee J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6362232 | biostudies-other | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7365455 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7977955 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6306215 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5460391 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7599179 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10509109 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5497233 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC10240018 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10854174 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3807656 | biostudies-literature