Dataset Information

A Scoping Review of Key Health Items in Self-Report Instruments Used Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT: The overall aim of this scoping review of the literature is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of all instruments that have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after solid organ transplantation and (2) to provide a list of health items they include to support future studies on the development of a new-generation HRQoL instrument. All studies that administered any form of HRQoL instrument to post-transplant solid organ recipients were identified in a comprehensive search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science, with a cut-off date of May 2018. The search used various combinations of the following keywords: lung, heart, liver, kidney, or pancreas transplantation; quality of life; well-being; patient-reported outcome; instrument; questionnaire; and health survey. In total, 8013 distinct publications were identified and 1218 of these were selected for review. Among the instruments applied, 53 measured generic, 51 organ-specific, 271 domain-specific, and 43 transplant-specific HRQoL. A total of 78 distinct health items grouped into 16 sub-domains were identified and depicted graphically. The majority of publications did not report a logical rationale for the choice of specific HRQoL instrument. The most commonly used types of instruments were generic health instruments, followed by domain-specific instruments. Despite the availability of transplant-specific instruments, few studies applied these types of instruments. Based on the 78 items, further research is planned to develop a patient-centered, transplant-specific HRQoL instrument that is concise, easy to apply (mobile application), and specifically related to the health issues of solid organ recipients.

SUBMITTER: Shahabeddin Parizi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6397139 | biostudies-other | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Scoping Review of Key Health Items in Self-Report Instruments Used Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Shahabeddin Parizi Ahmad A Krabbe Paul F M PFM Buskens Erik E Bakker Stephan J L SJL Vermeulen Karin M KM

The patient 20190401 2

The overall aim of this scoping review of the literature is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of all instruments that have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after solid organ transplantation and (2) to provide a list of health items they include to support future studies on the development of a new-generation HRQoL instrument. All studies that administered any form of HRQoL instrument to post-transplant solid organ recipients were identified in a comprehensive search o ...[more]

PMID: 30324230

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients [SOTRs] have elevated rates of certain rare cancers caused by viruses. Evaluating risk of rare cancers among SOTRs may provide etiological clues for additional cancers linked to poor immunity and viral infections. METHODS:We performed a cohort study of 262,455 SOTRs (1987-2014) from the US SOTR registry linked to 17 population-based cancer registries. First cancers in SOTRs were categorized using an established classification scheme based on site and histology. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) compared risk in SOTRs to the general population. We used Poisson regression to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) according to immune-related SOTR characteristics, including time since transplant (i.e., duration of immunosuppression). All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS:We examined 694 distinct cancer subtypes, with 33 manifesting statistically significantly elevated SIRs (Bonferroni p?<?7.2 x 10-5). All 33 are rare (incidence <6 per 100,000 person-years) and several have known viral etiology (e.g. Merkel cell carcinoma (SIR = 24.7, 95%CI = 20.8 to 29.1). Additional cancers that were increased include squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the lip (SIR range = 18.3-19.8), eye/adnexa (SIR = 13.8, 95%CI = 7.9 to 22.3), salivary gland (SIR = 9.3, 95%CI = 6.1 to 13.5), and nasal cavity/sinuses (SIR = 4.5, 95%CI = 2.8 to 6.8); sebaceous adenocarcinoma (SIR = 34.3, 95%CI = 26.3 to 44.0); malignant fibrous histiocytoma (15.4); and subtypes of bladder, kidney, lung, and colon cancer (SIR range = 3.2-13.3). Incidence of several cancers increased over time since transplant (ptrend<0.05), including SCCs of the lip, salivary gland, and anogenital sites. CONCLUSIONS:SOTRs experience elevated rates of several rare cancers. Because some of these cancers exhibit aggressive behavior with poor outcomes, it is important to further characterize the role of immunity and the potential involvement of oncogenic viruses to improve prevention and treatment.

Project description:ObjectiveTo examine the incidence of lower genital tract dysplasia in women after solid organ transplantation, to evaluate risk factors associated with development of dysplasia, and to assess the timeline of disease development.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of female patients who underwent solid organ transplantation at a large-volume tertiary care center between 2000 and 2015. Demographic and clinicopathologic factors were extracted from electronic medical records. Cumulative incidence of lower genital tract dysplasia was calculated, and univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for the development of dysplasia.ResultsAmong 394 female solid organ transplant recipients, the median age was 41 years (interquartile range 29-53). Forty-seven (11.9%; 95% CI 8.8-15.9%) women developed lower genital tract dysplasia over a median follow-up of 7.8 years (interquartile range 4.6-12.9). Thirty-eight (9.6%) developed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), with 14 (3.6%) diagnosed with CIN 2 or worse (one was cervical carcinoma). Nineteen (4.8%) developed noncervical lower genital tract dysplasia, including vulvar, vaginal, or anal dysplasia, with 13 (3.3%) diagnosed with high-grade dysplasia or worse (five were lower genital tract carcinoma [three anal, one vulvar, and one vaginal]). Ten (2.5%) developed both cervical and noncervical lower genital tract dysplasia. Black race was significantly associated with developing dysplasia (odds ratio [OR] 2.86; 95% CI 1.33-6.13) as was hydroxychloroquine use (OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.96-18.09). High-grade cervical dysplasia was diagnosed at a median interval of 3.18 years after transplant; noncervical high-grade lower genital tract dysplasia was diagnosed at a median interval of 3.94 years.ConclusionsOne in eight transplant recipients developed lower genital tract dysplasia and approximately half were high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Black race and hydroxychloroquine use were associated with an increased risk of dysplasia. Yearly cervical screening and comprehensive lower genital examination beyond the cervix is indicated in this population.

Dataset Information

A Scoping Review of Key Health Items in Self-Report Instruments Used Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Publications

A Scoping Review of Key Health Items in Self-Report Instruments Used Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets