Dataset Information

Exploring the association between BMI and mortality in Australian women and men with and without diabetes: the AusDiab study.

ABSTRACT: AIMS/HYPOTHESIS:There is conflicting evidence about the obesity paradox-the counterintuitive survival advantage of obesity among certain subpopulations of individuals with chronic conditions. It is believed that results supporting the obesity paradox are due to methodological flaws, such as collider bias. The aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and mortality in Australian men and women. In addition, we explored whether obesity would appear to be protective if the analysis was restricted to a subpopulation with disease, and to discuss the potential role of collider bias in producing such a result. METHODS:The examined cohort included 10,575 Australian adults (4844 men and 5731 women) aged 25-91 years who were recruited for the AusDiab baseline survey in 1999 and followed-up through 2014. The main predictor variable was BMI categorised as normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to <30 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2), and the outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models in the entire cohort and then in subpopulations with and without diabetes. RESULTS:A total of 1477 deaths occurred during 145,384 person-years (median 14.6 years) of follow-up. Mortality was higher in obese than in normal-weight individuals for the full population (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05, 1.32). When an interaction between diabetes status and BMI category was added to the model, there was no evidence of an interaction between BMI and diabetes status (p = 0.92). When participants with and without diabetes were analysed separately, there was no evidence of an association between obesity and mortality in those with diabetes (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.62, 1.33). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION:In the entire AusDiab cohort, we found a significantly higher mortality among obese participants as compared with their normal-weight counterparts. We found no difference in the obesity-mortality association between individuals with and without diabetes.

SUBMITTER: Zahir SF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6450848 | biostudies-other | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exploring the association between BMI and mortality in Australian women and men with and without diabetes: the AusDiab study.

Zahir Syeda F SF Griffin Alison A Veerman J Lennert JL Magliano Dianna J DJ Shaw Jonathan E JE Cao Kim-Anh Lê KL Mehdi Ahmed M AM

Diabetologia 20190226 5

<h4>Aims/hypothesis</h4>There is conflicting evidence about the obesity paradox-the counterintuitive survival advantage of obesity among certain subpopulations of individuals with chronic conditions. It is believed that results supporting the obesity paradox are due to methodological flaws, such as collider bias. The aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and mortality in Australian men and women. In addition, we explored whether obesity would appear to be protective if ...[more]

PMID: 30809715

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivePrevious studies have reported sex differences in associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke; however, the risk for cardiac death and all-cause mortality in women compared with men has not been reported. Therefore, this quantitative meta-analysis was performed to provide reliable estimates of sex differences in the effect of DM on major cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, irrespective of DM type.DesignMeta-analysis.Data sourcesThe PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched in April 2018.Eligibility criteriaInvestigations designed as prospective cohort studies that examined the association between DM and major cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality stratified according to sex were included.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by 2 of the authors, and the relative risk ratio (RRR) obtained using a random effects model was used to measure sex differences in the associations of DM with major cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.ResultsThirty prospective cohort studies that reported data from 1 148 188 individuals were included. The pooled women-to-men RRR suggested that female sex was associated with an increased risk for CHD (RRR 1.52(95% CI 1.32 to 1.76); p<0.001), stroke (RRR 1.23(95% CI 1.09 to 1.39); p=0.001), cardiac death (RRR 1.49(95% CI 1.11 to 2.00); p=0.009) and all-cause mortality (RRR 1.51(95% CI 1.23 to 1.85); p<0.001). In addition, sex differences for the investigated outcomes in the comparison between DM and non-DM patients were variable after stratification of studies according to publication year, country, sample size, assessment of DM, follow-up duration, adjustment for important cardiovascular risk factors and study quality.ConclusionsFindings of the present study suggested that women with DM had an extremely high risk for CHD, stroke, cardiac death and all-cause mortality compared with men with DM.

Dataset Information

Exploring the association between BMI and mortality in Australian women and men with and without diabetes: the AusDiab study.

Publications

Exploring the association between BMI and mortality in Australian women and men with and without diabetes: the AusDiab study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets