Dataset Information

Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low-density EEG.

ABSTRACT: Objective:Electrical source imaging (ESI) is used increasingly to estimate the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with epilepsy. Directed functional connectivity (DFC) coupled to ESI helps to better characterize epileptic networks, but studies on interictal activity have relied on high-density recordings. We investigated the accuracy of ESI and DFC for localizing the EZ, based on low-density clinical electroencephalography (EEG). Methods:We selected patients with the following: (a) focal epilepsy, (b) interictal spikes on standard EEG, (c) either a focal structural lesion concordant with the electroclinical semiology or good postoperative outcome. In 34 patients (20 temporal lobe epilepsy [TLE], 14 extra-TLE [ETLE]), we marked interictal spikes and estimated the cortical activity during each spike in 82 cortical regions using a patient-specific head model and distributed linear inverse solution. DFC between brain regions was computed using Granger-causal modeling followed by network topologic measures. The concordance with the presumed EZ at the sublobar level was computed using the epileptogenic lesion or the resected area in postoperative seizure-free patients. Results:ESI, summed outflow, and efficiency were concordant with the presumed EZ in 76% of the patients, whereas the clustering coefficient and betweenness centrality were concordant in 70% of patients. There was no significant difference between ESI and connectivity measures. In all measures, patients with TLE had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) concordance with the presumed EZ than patients with with ETLE. The brain volume accepted for concordance was significantly larger in TLE. Significance:ESI and DFC derived from low-density EEG can reliably estimate the EZ from interictal spikes. Connectivity measures were not superior to ESI for EZ localization during interictal spikes, but the current validation of the localization of connectivity measure is promising for other applications.

SUBMITTER: Coito A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6546067 | biostudies-other | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low-density EEG.

Coito Ana A Biethahn Silke S Tepperberg Janina J Carboni Margherita M Roelcke Ulrich U Seeck Margitta M van Mierlo Pieter P Gschwind Markus M Vulliemoz Serge S

Epilepsia open 20190414 2

<h4>Objective</h4>Electrical source imaging (ESI) is used increasingly to estimate the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with epilepsy. Directed functional connectivity (DFC) coupled to ESI helps to better characterize epileptic networks, but studies on interictal activity have relied on high-density recordings. We investigated the accuracy of ESI and DFC for localizing the EZ, based on low-density clinical electroencephalography (EEG).<h4>Methods</h4>We selected patients with the following: ( ...[more]

PMID: 31168495

Similar Datasets

Project description:Over 15 million epilepsy patients worldwide have drug-resistant epilepsy. Successful surgery is a standard of care treatment but can only be achieved through complete resection or disconnection of the epileptogenic zone, the brain region(s) where seizures originate. Surgical success rates vary between 20% and 80%, because no clinically validated biological markers of the epileptogenic zone exist. Localizing the epileptogenic zone is a costly and time-consuming process, which often requires days to weeks of intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. Clinicians visually inspect iEEG data to identify abnormal activity on individual channels occurring immediately before seizures or spikes that occur interictally (i.e. between seizures). In the end, the clinical standard mainly relies on a small proportion of the iEEG data captured to assist in epileptogenic zone localization (minutes of seizure data versus days of recordings), missing opportunities to leverage these largely ignored interictal data to better diagnose and treat patients. IEEG offers a unique opportunity to observe epileptic cortical network dynamics but waiting for seizures increases patient risks associated with invasive monitoring. In this study, we aimed to leverage interictal iEEG data by developing a new network-based interictal iEEG marker of the epileptogenic zone. We hypothesized that when a patient is not clinically seizing, it is because the epileptogenic zone is inhibited by other regions. We developed an algorithm that identifies two groups of nodes from the interictal iEEG network: those that are continuously inhibiting a set of neighbouring nodes ('sources') and the inhibited nodes themselves ('sinks'). Specifically, patient-specific dynamical network models were estimated from minutes of iEEG and their connectivity properties revealed top sources and sinks in the network, with each node being quantified by source-sink metrics. We validated the algorithm in a retrospective analysis of 65 patients. The source-sink metrics identified epileptogenic regions with 73% accuracy and clinicians agreed with the algorithm in 93% of seizure-free patients. The algorithm was further validated by using the metrics of the annotated epileptogenic zone to predict surgical outcomes. The source-sink metrics predicted outcomes with an accuracy of 79% compared to an accuracy of 43% for clinicians' predictions (surgical success rate of this dataset). In failed outcomes, we identified brain regions with high metrics that were untreated. When compared with high frequency oscillations, the most commonly proposed interictal iEEG feature for epileptogenic zone localization, source-sink metrics outperformed in predictive power (by a factor of 1.2), suggesting they may be an interictal iEEG fingerprint of the epileptogenic zone.

Project description:Aim: In neuroscience research, data are quite often characterized by an imbalanced distribution between the majority and minority classes, an issue that can limit or even worsen the prediction performance of machine learning methods. Different resampling procedures have been developed to face this problem and a lot of work has been done in comparing their effectiveness in different scenarios. Notably, the robustness of such techniques has been tested among a wide variety of different datasets, without considering the performance of each specific dataset. In this study, we compare the performances of different resampling procedures for the imbalanced domain in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) recordings of the patients with focal epilepsies who underwent surgery. Methods: We considered data obtained by network analysis of interictal SEEG recorded from 10 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies, for a supervised classification problem aimed at distinguishing between the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic brain regions in interictal conditions. We investigated the effectiveness of five oversampling and five undersampling procedures, using 10 different machine learning classifiers. Moreover, six specific ensemble methods for the imbalanced domain were also tested. To compare the performances, Area under the ROC curve (AUC), F-measure, Geometric Mean, and Balanced Accuracy were considered. Results: Both the resampling procedures showed improved performances with respect to the original dataset. The oversampling procedure was found to be more sensitive to the type of classification method employed, with Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) exhibiting the best performances. All the undersampling approaches were more robust than the oversampling among the different classifiers, with Random Undersampling (RUS) exhibiting the best performance despite being the simplest and most basic classification method. Conclusions: The application of machine learning techniques that take into consideration the balance of features by resampling is beneficial and leads to more accurate localization of the epileptogenic zone from interictal periods. In addition, our results highlight the importance of the type of classification method that must be used together with the resampling to maximize the benefit to the outcome.

Project description:Drug-resistant focal epilepsy is a major clinical problem and surgery is under-used. Better non-invasive techniques for epileptogenic zone localization are needed when MRI shows no lesion or an extensive lesion. The problem is interictal and ictal localization before propagation from the epileptogenic zone. High-density EEG (HDEEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) offer millisecond-order temporal resolution to address this but co-acquisition is challenging, ictal MEG studies are rare, long-term prospective studies are lacking, and fundamental questions remain. Should HDEEG-MEG discharges be assessed independently [electroencephalographic source localization (ESL), magnetoencephalographic source localization (MSL)] or combined (EMSL) for source localization? Which phase of the discharge best characterizes the epileptogenic zone (defined by intracranial EEG and surgical resection relative to outcome)? Does this differ for interictal and ictal discharges? Does MEG detect mesial temporal lobe discharges? Thirteen patients (10 non-lesional, three extensive-lesional) underwent synchronized HDEEG-MEG (72-94 channel EEG, 306-sensor MEG). Source localization (standardized low-resolution tomographic analysis with MRI patient-individualized boundary-element method) was applied to averaged interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) and ictal discharges at three phases: 'early-phase' (first latency 90% explained variance), 'mid-phase' (first of 50% rising-phase, 50% mean global field power), 'late-phase' (negative peak). 'Earliest-solution' was the first of the three early-phase solutions (ESL, MSL, EMSL). Prospective follow-up was 3-21 (median 12) months before surgery, 14-39 (median 21) months after surgery. IEDs (n = 1474) were recorded, seen in: HDEEG only, 626 (42%); MEG only, 232 (16%); and both 616 (42%). Thirty-three seizures were captured, seen in: HDEEG only, seven (21%); MEG only, one (3%); and both 25 (76%). Intracranial EEG was done in nine patients. Engel scores were I (9/13, 69%), II (2/13,15%), and III (2/13). MEG detected baso-mesial temporal lobe epileptogenic zone sources. Epileptogenic zone OR [odds ratio(s)] were significantly higher for earliest-solution versus early-phase IED-surgical resection and earliest-solution versus all mid-phase and late-phase solutions. ESL outperformed EMSL for ictal-surgical resection [OR 3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-11.55, P = 0.036]. MSL outperformed EMSL for IED-intracranial EEG (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.19-18.34, P = 0.027). ESL outperformed MSL for ictal-surgical resection (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.16-12.03, P = 0.028) but was outperformed by MSL for IED-intracranial EEG (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.73, P = 0.017). Thus, (i) HDEEG and MEG source solutions more accurately localize the epileptogenic zone at the earliest resolvable phase of interictal and ictal discharges, not mid-phase (as is common practice) or late peak-phase (when signal-to-noise ratios are maximal); (ii) from empirical observation of the differential timing of HDEEG and MEG discharges and based on the superiority of ESL plus MSL over either modality alone and over EMSL, concurrent HDEEG-MEG signals should be assessed independently, not combined; (iii) baso-mesial temporal lobe sources are detectable by MEG; and (iv) MEG is not 'more accurate' than HDEEG-emphasis is best placed on the earliest signal (whether HDEEG or MEG) amenable to source localization. Our findings challenge current practice and our reliance on invasive monitoring in these patients. 10.1093/brain/awz015_video1 awz015media1 6018582479001.

Project description:EEG source imaging is becoming widely used for the evaluation of medically refractory focal epilepsy. The validity of EEG source imaging has been established in several studies comparing source imaging to the surgical resection cavity and subsequent seizure freedom. We present a cohort of 87 patients and compare EEG source imaging of both ictal and interictal scalp EEG to the seizure onset zone on intracranial EEG. Concordance of EEG source imaging with intracranial EEG was determined on a sublobar level and was quantified by measuring the distance between the source imaging result and the centroid of the active seizure onset zone electrodes. The EEG source imaging results of a subgroup of 26 patients with high density 76-channel EEG were compared with the localization of three experienced epileptologists. Of 87 patients, 95% had at least one analysis concordant with intracranial EEG and 74% had complete concordance. There was a higher rate of complete concordance in temporal lobe epilepsy compared to extratemporal (89.3 and 62.8%, respectively, P = 0.015). Of the total 282 analyses performed on this cohort, higher concordance was also seen in temporal discharges (95%) compared to extratemporal (77%) (P = 0.0012), but no difference was seen comparing high-density EEG with standard (32-channel) EEG. Subgroup analysis of ictal waveforms showed greater concordance for ictal spiking, compared with rhythmic activity, paroxysmal fast activity, or obscured onset. Median distances from the dipole and maximum distributed source to a centroid of seizure onset zone electrodes were 30.0 and 32.5 mm, respectively, and the median distances from dipole and maximum distributed source to nearest seizure onset zone electrode were 22.8 and 21.7, respectively. There were significantly shorter distances in ictal spiking. There were shorter distances in patients with Engel Class 1 outcome from surgical resection compared to patients with worse outcomes. For the subgroup of 26 high-density EEG patients, EEG source localization had a significantly higher concordance (92% versus 65%), sensitivity (57% versus 35%) and positive predictive value (60% versus 36%) compared with epileptologist localization. Our study demonstrates good concordance between ictal and interictal source imaging and intracranial EEG. Temporal lobe discharges have higher concordance rates than extratemporal discharges. Importantly, this study shows that source imaging has greater agreement with intracranial EEG than visual review alone, supporting its role in surgical planning.

Dataset Information

Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low-density EEG.

Publications

Interictal epileptogenic zone localization in patients with focal epilepsy using electric source imaging and directed functional connectivity from low-density EEG.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets