Dataset Information

Derivation and Validation of Age- and Body Mass Index-Adjusted Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Dosing.

ABSTRACT: Unfractionated heparin dosing is unpredictable and subject to numerous pharmacokinetic changes including distribution and metabolic changes associated with obesity and age. Weight-based dosing is commonly used to better predict the dose for a patient when targeting a therapeutic range. A dosing equation that adjusts weight-based doses for age and body mass index may improve therapeutic dose prediction. We conducted a 2-phase observational study with a derivation and validation period to develop an equation to adjust weight-based unfractionated heparin for age and body mass index to target a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds. The first phase retrospectively identified patients who acheived therapeutic anticoagulation and utilized linear regression to determine a predictive equation for weight-based dosing that adjusts for age and body mass index. The second phase prospectively identified patients in an observational manner and compared the dose of unfractionated heparin on which they became therapeutic against both the weight-based dose and the predicted dose adjusted for age and body mass index. The correlation between predictive age and body mass index adjusted dose and actual therapeutic dose was 0.703 compared to the correlation between the empiric weight-based dose and actual therapeutic dose which was 0.532 ( P = .05). Age and body mass index adjusted weight-based dosing significantly improved therapeutic dose prediction for unfractionated heparin. Further study in a prospective, randomized trial is warranted for validation of this approach in a real world setting.

SUBMITTER: Schurr JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6714904 | biostudies-other | 2019 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Derivation and Validation of Age- and Body Mass Index-Adjusted Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Dosing.

Schurr James W JW Muske Anne-Marie AM Stevens Craig A CA Culbreth Sarah E SE Sylvester Katelyn W KW Connors Jean M JM

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 20190101

Unfractionated heparin dosing is unpredictable and subject to numerous pharmacokinetic changes including distribution and metabolic changes associated with obesity and age. Weight-based dosing is commonly used to better predict the dose for a patient when targeting a therapeutic range. A dosing equation that adjusts weight-based doses for age and body mass index may improve therapeutic dose prediction. We conducted a 2-phase observational study with a derivation and validation period to develop ...[more]

PMID: 30841720

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend 30 mL/kg of fluids within 3 hours (30by3) of sepsis-induced hypoperfusion, but a national mandate released an allowance for dosing based on ideal instead of actual body weight (IBW/ABW) for obese patients. This study aims to determine the dose-effect of 30by3 for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (SS/SS) with respect to body mass index (BMI) categories and secondarily, examine the clinical impact of IBW vs. ABW-based dosing.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years; n = 1,032) with SS/SS presenting to an urban, tertiary-care emergency department. Models include MEDS score, antibiotic timing, lactate, renal and heart failure, among others.ResultsThe cohort was 10.2% underweight and 28.7% obese. Overall mortality was 17.1% with 20.4% shock mortality. An exponential increase in mortality was observed for each 5 mL/kg under 30by3 for underweight (p = 0.02), but not obese patients. ABW vs IBW-30by3 dosing was reached in 80.0 vs 52.4% (underweight), 56.4 vs 56.9% (normal/overweight), and 23.3 vs 46.0% (obese). Across all BMI categories, there was increased mortality for not reaching ABW-based 30by3 dosing (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.18-2.69) with no significant impact for IBW (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87 -1.91). The increased mortality for failing to reach ABW-dosed 30by3 remained for underweight patients ABW (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.32-25.57) but not obese patients. Longer ICU stays were observed for not reaching 30by3 based on ABW (β = 2.40, 95% CI 0.84-3.95) and IBW dosing (β = 1.58, 95% CI 0.07-3.08) overall. This effect remained for obese and underweight (except IBW dosing) patients.ConclusionsAn exponential, dose-effect increase in mortality was observed for underweight patients not receiving 30by3. Therefore, the mortality impact of under-dosing may be amplified using ABW for underweight patients. Fluid dosing did not impact mortality for obese patients, but we caution against deviation from guidelines without further studies.

Project description:BackgroundLow molecular weight heparins (LMWH) have been extensively studied and became the treatment of choice for several indications including pulmonary embolism. While their efficacy in hemodialysis is considered similar to unfractionated heparin (UFH), their safety remains controversial mainly due to a risk of bioaccumulation in patients with renal impairment. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety of LMWH when compared to UFH for extracorporeal circuit (ECC) anticoagulation.MethodsWe used Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Trip database and NICE to retrieve relevant studies with no language restriction. We looked for controlled experimental trials comparing LMWH to UFH for ECC anticoagulation among end-stage renal disease patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Studies were kept if they reported at least one of the following outcomes: bleeding, lipid profile, cardiovascular events, osteoporosis or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Two independent reviewers conducted studies selection, quality assessment and data extraction with discrepancies solved by a third reviewer. Relative risk and 95% CI was calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean weighted difference (MWD) with 95% CI was used to pool continuous variables.ResultsSeventeen studies were selected as part of the systematic. The relative risk for total bleeding was 0.76 (95% CI 0.26-2.22). The WMD calculated for total cholesterol was -28.70 mg/dl (95% CI -51.43 to -5.98), a WMD for triglycerides of -55.57 mg/dl (95% CI -94.49 to -16.66) was estimated, and finally LDL-cholesterol had a WMD of -14.88 mg/dl (95% CI -36.27 to 6.51).ConclusionsLMWH showed to be at least as safe as UFH for ECC anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis. The limited number of studies reporting on osteoporosis and HIT does not allow any conclusion for these outcomes. Larger studies are needed to evaluate properly the safety of LMWH in chronic hemodialysis.

Dataset Information

Derivation and Validation of Age- and Body Mass Index-Adjusted Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Dosing.

Publications

Derivation and Validation of Age- and Body Mass Index-Adjusted Weight-Based Unfractionated Heparin Dosing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets