Dataset Information

The utility of Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:The omission of the immunohistochemical proliferation marker Ki-67 labelling index (henceforth, simply Ki-67) from the 2015 WHO classification system of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (Lung-NETs) as a prognostic and grading criterion remains controversial. This systematic review along with meta-analysis will be conducted to assess the prognostic/grading utility of Ki-67 in Lung-NETs. METHODS:This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A systematic search of MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be performed from the inception of each database to 28 February 2019 for studies investigating any role of Ki-67 in Lung-NETs. Only full papers published in English detailing survival outcomes and HRs according to Ki-67 will be included. The primary endpoint will be establishing whether Ki-67 is a reliable marker in determining prognosis and thus assessing grade of Lung-NETs patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:Ethical approval will not be required as this is an academic review of published literature. Findings will be disseminated through the preparation of a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal as well as presentation at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:CRD42018093389.

SUBMITTER: Naheed S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6720315 | biostudies-other | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The utility of Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Naheed Salma S Holden Chloe C Tanno Lulu L Jaynes Eleanor E Cave Judith J Ottensmeier Christian H CH Pelosi Giuseppe G

BMJ open 20190824 8

<h4>Introduction</h4>The omission of the immunohistochemical proliferation marker Ki-67 labelling index (henceforth, simply Ki-67) from the 2015 WHO classification system of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (Lung-NETs) as a prognostic and grading criterion remains controversial. This systematic review along with meta-analysis will be conducted to assess the prognostic/grading utility of Ki-67 in Lung-NETs.<h4>Methods</h4>This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred R ...[more]

PMID: 31446421

Similar Datasets

Project description:Ki-67 assessment is a key step in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) from all anatomic locations. Several challenges exist related to quantifying the Ki-67 proliferation index due to lack of method standardization and inter-reader variability. The application of digital pathology coupled with machine learning has been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible for the evaluation of Ki-67 in NENs. We systematically reviewed all published studies on the subject of Ki-67 assessment in pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) employing digital image analysis (DIA). The most common advantages of DIA were improvement in the standardization and reliability of Ki-67 evaluation, as well as its speed and practicality, compared to the current gold standard approach of manual counts from captured images, which is cumbersome and time consuming. The main limitations were attributed to higher costs, lack of widespread availability (as of yet), operator qualification and training issues (if it is not done by pathologists), and most importantly, the drawback of image algorithms counting contaminating non-neoplastic cells and other signals like hemosiderin. However, solutions are rapidly developing for all of these challenging issues. A comparative meta-analysis for DIA versus manual counting shows very high concordance (global coefficient of concordance: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) between these two modalities. These findings support the widespread adoption of validated DIA methods for Ki-67 assessment in PanNENs, provided that measures are in place to ensure counting of only tumor cells either by software modifications or education of non-pathologist operators, as well as selection of standard regions of interest for analysis. NENs, being cellular and monotonous neoplasms, are naturally more amenable to Ki-67 assessment. However, lessons of this review may be applicable to other neoplasms where proliferation activity has become an integral part of theranostic evaluation including breast, brain, and hematolymphoid neoplasms.

Project description:BackgroundNeuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is a group of rare tumors. Among which, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN) is the most common group. The World Health Organization (WHO) classified these tumors into three different grades (G1, G2, and G3) based on Ki-67 and mitotic rate, and updated the classification in 2019. Several previous studies proved that Ki-67 was related to tumor prognosis, but others still reported that Ki-67 had no predictive value for tumor prognosis. There are different conclusions between studies regarding the correlation between Ki-67 and tumor prognosis, and there is a lack of studies about this correlation of GEP-NENs. Further analysis is still needed to evaluate the prognostic value of Ki-67 in GEP-NENs, to provide reference for clinical decisions.MethodsA total of 303 studies were retrieved that included Ki-67, GEP-NENs, prognosis, survival, and other subject terms and keywords. We excluded studies that did not show complete Ki-67 index, number of patients and 5-year survival data available for meta-analysis, non-cohort studies, articles published before 2000 or not published in English. Fifteen studies were finally included to assess the value of Ki-67 in the prognosis of patients with GEP-NENs using a random-effects model.ResultsThe cumulative 5-year survival rate for GEP-NEN G1 (Ki-67 ≤2%), G2 (Ki-67 2-20%) and G3 (Ki-67 >20%) was 86%, 65%, 25% respectively. The 5-year survival rate of GEP-NEN G1 (Ki-67 <3%, first revised in WHO classification 2017, redefined WHO classification 2019) and G1 (Ki-67 ≤2%, WHO classification 2010) was 97% and 84% respectively.ConclusionsThe overall prognosis of GEP-NENs patients showed a decreasing trend with the increase of Ki-67, which confirmed the significance of Ki-67 index as a prognostic marker for the prognosis of GEP-NENs. Increasing the cut-off value of Ki-67 index for G1 grade from ≤2% to <3% according to WHO classification 2019 did not significantly decrease the 5-year survival rate.

Project description:BackgroundLong-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are the primary first-line treatment of well-differentiated advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but data about their efficacy in pancreatic NETs (panNETs) with Ki-67 ≥10% are still limited.Materials and methodsTo assess the clinical outcomes of advanced, nonfunctioning, well-differentiated panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10% receiving first-line long-acting SSAs in a real-world setting, we carried out a retrospective, multicenter study including patients treated between 2014-2018 across 10 centers of the NET CONNECT Network. The primary endpoints were time to next treatment (TNT) and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas overall survival (OS) and treatment safety were secondary endpoints.ResultsA total of 73 patients were included (68 grade [G]2, 5 G3), with liver metastases in 61 cases (84%). After a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 6-173), the median TNT and PFS were 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-16.2) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.6-14.1) respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed according to the somatostatin analog used (octreotide vs. lanreotide), whereas increased tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.2-16.6; p = .04) and hepatic tumor load (HR, 2; 95% CI, 1-4; p = .03) were independently associated with shortened PFS. The median OS recorded was 86 months (95% CI, 56.8-86 months), with poor outcomes observed when the hepatic tumor burden was >25% (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-10; p = .01). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 14 patients, most frequently diarrhea.ConclusionSSAs exert antiproliferative activity in panNETs with Ki-67 ≥10%, particularly in G2 tumors, as well as when hepatic tumor load is ≤25%.Implications for practiceThe results of the study call into question the antiproliferative activity of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with Ki-67 ≥10%. Patients with grade 2 tumors and with hepatic tumor load ≤25% appear to derive higher benefit from SSAs. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results to optimize tailored therapeutic strategies for this specific patient population.

Project description:BackgroundAnillin (ANLN), an actin-binding protein required for cytokinesis, has recently been presented as part of a prognostic marker panel in breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to further explore the prognostic and functional value of ANLN as a single biomarker in breast cancer.MethodsImmunohistochemical assessment of ANLN protein expression was performed in two well characterized breast cancer cohorts (n = 484) with long-term clinical follow-up data and the results were further validated at the mRNA level in a publicly available transcriptomics dataset. The functional relevance of ANLN was investigated in two breast cancer cell lines using RNA interference.ResultsHigh nuclear fraction of ANLN in breast tumor cells was significantly associated with large tumor size, high histological grade, high proliferation rate, hormone receptor negative tumors and poor prognosis in both examined cohorts. Multivariable analysis showed that the association between ANLN and survival was significantly independent of age in cohort I and significantly independent of proliferation, as assessed by Ki-67 expression in tumor cells, age, tumor size, ER and PR status, HER2 status and nodal status in cohort II. Analysis of ANLN mRNA expression confirmed that high expression of ANLN was significantly correlated to poor overall survival in breast cancer patients. Consistent with the role of ANLN during cytokinesis, transient knock-down of ANLN protein expression in breast cancer cell lines resulted in an increase of senescent cells and an accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle with altered cell morphology including large, poly-nucleated cells. Moreover, ANLN siRNA knockdown also resulted in decreased expression of cyclins D1, A2 and B1.ConclusionsANLN expression in breast cancer cells plays an important role during cell division and a high fraction of nuclear ANLN expression in tumor cells is correlated to poor prognosis in breast cancer patients, independent of Ki-67, tumor size, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, nodal status and age.

Dataset Information

The utility of Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publications

The utility of Ki-67 as a prognostic biomarker in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets