Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction of Gastric Cancer by High-Performance Serum Lipidome Fingerprints
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Dr. Ze-Rong Cai
PROVIDER: S-SCDT-10_1038-S44321-024-00169-0 | biostudies-other |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other
Similar Datasets
Project description:High-performance metabolic analysis is emerging in the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer (BrCa). Still, advanced tools are in demand to deliver the application potentials of metabolic analysis. Here, we used fast nanoparticle-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (NPELDI-MS) to record serum metabolic fingerprints (SMFs) of BrCa in seconds, achieving high reproducibility and low consumption of direct serum detection without treatment. Subsequently, machine learning of SMFs generated by NPELDI-MS functioned as an efficient readout to distinguish BrCa from non-BrCa with an area under the curve of 0.948. Furthermore, a metabolic prognosis scoring system was constructed using SMFs with effective prediction performance toward BrCa (P < 0.005). Finally, we identified a biomarker panel of seven metabolites that were differentially enriched in BrCa serum and their related pathways. Together, our findings provide an efficient serum metabolic tool to characterize BrCa and highlight certain metabolic signatures as potential diagnostic and prognostic factors of diseases including but not limited to BrCa.
| S-EPMC8944253 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently emerged as vital players in tumor biology with potential value in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics. The lncRNA HULC (highly up-regulated in liver cancer) is increased in many malignancies, yet its serum expression profile and clinical value in gastric cancer (GC) patients remain unclear. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for large-scale analysis of the serum expression of HULC in GC patients reliably detected circulating HULC and revealed that it is upregulated in GC patients. A high serum HULC level correlated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis stage, and H. pylori infection. The area under the ROC curve for HULC was up to 0.888, which was higher than that for CEA (0.694) and CA72-4 (0.514). Follow-up detection and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed HULC is a good predictor of GC prognosis. Our present study indicates that circulating HULC may represent a novel serum tumor marker for early diagnosis and monitoring progression and prognosis of GC.
| S-EPMC5239513 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in serum may serve as promising diagnostic biomarkers for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) based Exiqon panel, we identified 58 differentially expressed miRNAs from 3 GC pool samples and 1 normal control (NC) pool in the initial screening phase. Identified miRNAs were further validated in the training (49 GC VS. 47 NCs) and validation phases (154 GC VS. 120 NCs) using qRT-PCR. Consequently, six serum miRNAs (miR-10b-5p, miR-132-3p, miR-185-5p, miR-195-5p, miR-20a-3p and miR-296-5p) were significantly overexpressed in GC compared with NCs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the six-miRNA panel were 0.764 and 0.702 for the training and validation phases, respectively. In conclusion, we identified a six-miRNA panel in serum for the detection of GC.
2016-08-31 | GSE86226 | GEO
Project description:Gastric cancer (GC) patients usually receive surgical treatment. Postoperative therapeutic options such as anticancer adjuvant therapies (AT) based on prognostic prediction models would provide patient-specific treatment to decrease postsurgical morbidity and mortality rates. Relevant prognostic factors in resected GC patient's serum may improve therapeutic measures in a non-invasive manner. In order to develop a GC prognostic model, we designed a retrospective study. In this study, serum samples were collected from 227 patients at a 4-week recovery period after D2 lymph node dissection, and 103 cancer-related serum proteins were analyzed by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Using the quantitative values of the serum proteins, we developed SEPROGADIC (SErum PROtein-based GAstric cancer preDICtor) prognostic model consisting of 6 to 14 serum proteins depending on detailed purposes of the model, prognosis prediction and proper AT selection. SEPROGADIC could clearly classify patients with good or bad prognosis at each TNM stage (1b, 2, 3 and 4) and identify a patient subgroup who would benefit from CCRT (combined chemoradiation therapy) rather than CTX (chemotherapy), or vice versa. Our study demonstrated that serum proteins could serve as prognostic factors along with clinical stage information in patients with resected gastric cancer, thus allowing patient-tailored postsurgical treatment.
| S-EPMC6237900 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND: Cancer survival studies are commonly analyzed using survival-time prediction models for cancer prognosis. A number of different performance metrics are used to ascertain the concordance between the predicted risk score of each patient and the actual survival time, but these metrics can sometimes conflict. Alternatively, patients are sometimes divided into two classes according to a survival-time threshold, and binary classifiers are applied to predict each patient's class. Although this approach has several drawbacks, it does provide natural performance metrics such as positive and negative predictive values to enable unambiguous assessments. METHODS: We compare the survival-time prediction and survival-time threshold approaches to analyzing cancer survival studies. We review and compare common performance metrics for the two approaches. We present new randomization tests and cross-validation methods to enable unambiguous statistical inferences for several performance metrics used with the survival-time prediction approach. We consider five survival prediction models consisting of one clinical model, two gene expression models, and two models from combinations of clinical and gene expression models. RESULTS: A public breast cancer dataset was used to compare several performance metrics using five prediction models. 1) For some prediction models, the hazard ratio from fitting a Cox proportional hazards model was significant, but the two-group comparison was insignificant, and vice versa. 2) The randomization test and cross-validation were generally consistent with the p-values obtained from the standard performance metrics. 3) Binary classifiers highly depended on how the risk groups were defined; a slight change of the survival threshold for assignment of classes led to very different prediction results. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Different performance metrics for evaluation of a survival prediction model may give different conclusions in its discriminatory ability. 2) Evaluation using a high-risk versus low-risk group comparison depends on the selected risk-score threshold; a plot of p-values from all possible thresholds can show the sensitivity of the threshold selection. 3) A randomization test of the significance of Somers' rank correlation can be used for further evaluation of performance of a prediction model. 4) The cross-validated power of survival prediction models decreases as the training and test sets become less balanced.
| S-EPMC3410808 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundTo reduce the high incidence and mortality of gastric cancer (GC), we aimed to develop deep learning-based models to assist in predicting the diagnosis and overall survival (OS) of GC patients using pathological images.Methods2333 hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathological pictures of 1037 GC patients were collected from two cohorts to develop our algorithms, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (RHWU) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Additionally, we gained 175 digital pictures of 91 GC patients from National Human Genetic Resources Sharing Service Platform (NHGRP), served as the independent external validation set. Two models were developed using artificial intelligence (AI), one named GastroMIL for diagnosing GC, and the other named MIL-GC for predicting outcome of GC.FindingsThe discriminatory power of GastroMIL achieved accuracy 0.920 in the external validation set, superior to that of the junior pathologist and comparable to that of expert pathologists. In the prognostic model, C-indices for survival prediction of internal and external validation sets were 0.671 and 0.657, respectively. Moreover, the risk score output by MIL-GC in the external validation set was proved to be a strong predictor of OS both in the univariate (HR = 2.414, P < 0.0001) and multivariable (HR = 1.803, P = 0.043) analyses. The predicting process is available at an online website (https://baigao.github.io/Pathologic-Prognostic-Analysis/).InterpretationOur study developed AI models and contributed to predicting precise diagnosis and prognosis of GC patients, which will offer assistance to choose appropriate treatment to improve the survival status of GC patients.FundingNot applicable.
| S-EPMC8529077 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Oral cancer (OC) is a deadly disease with a high mortality and complex etiology. Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the outstanding innovations in technology used in dental science. This paper intends to report on the application and performance of AI in diagnosis and predicting the occurrence of OC. In this study, we carried out data search through an electronic search in several renowned databases, which mainly included PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and the Saudi Digital Library for articles that were published between January 2000 to March 2021. We included 16 articles that met the eligibility criteria and were critically analyzed using QUADAS-2. AI can precisely analyze an enormous dataset of images (fluorescent, hyperspectral, cytology, CT images, etc.) to diagnose OC. AI can accurately predict the occurrence of OC, as compared to conventional methods, by analyzing predisposing factors like age, gender, tobacco habits, and bio-markers. The precision and accuracy of AI in diagnosis as well as predicting the occurrence are higher than the current, existing clinical strategies, as well as conventional statistics like cox regression analysis and logistic regression.
| S-EPMC8227647 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlthough gastric cancer (GC) remains the second cause of cancer-related death, useful biomarkers for prognosis are still unavailable. We present here the attempt of mining novel biomarkers for GC prognosis by using serum proteomics.MethodsSera from 43 GC patients and 41 controls with gastritis as Group 1 and 11 GC patients as Group 2 was successively detected by Surface Enhanced Laser Desorption/ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) with Q10 chip. Peaks were acquired by Ciphergen ProteinChip Software 3.2.0 and analyzed by Zhejiang University-ProteinChip Data Analysis System (ZJU-PDAS). CEA level were evaluated by chemiluminescence immunoassay.ResultsAfter median follow-up periods of 33 months, Group 1 with 4 GC patients lost was divided into 20 good-prognosis GC patients (overall survival more than 24 months) and 19 poor-prognosis GC patients (no more than 24 months). The established prognosis pattern consisted of 5 novel prognosis biomarkers with 84.2% sensitivity and 85.0% specificity, which were significantly higher than those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and TNM stage. We also tested prognosis pattern blindly in Group 2 with 66.7% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. Moreover, we found that 4474-Da peak elevated significantly in GC and was associated with advanced stage (III+IV) and short survival (p < 0.03).ConclusionWe have identified a number of novel biomarkers for prognosis prediction of GC by using SELDI-TOF-MS combined with sophisticated bioinformatics. Particularly, elevated expression of 4474-Da peak showed very promising to be developed into a novel biomarker associated with biologically aggressive features of GC.
| S-EPMC2753349 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gastric cancer is one of leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is a notable disease due to its heterogeneity. Recently, numerous studies have investigated the molecular basis of gastric cancer, involving the alteration of pathogenesis, and invasion and metastasis. With the development of modern technologies, various novel biomarkers had been identified that appear to possess diagnostic and prognostic value; therefore, the present review describes our current knowledge of biomarkers for the early diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer. Classic biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis include carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 19-9, while microRNA and DNA hypomethylation are proposed as novel biomarkers. Excluding classical biomarkers, biomarkers for determining the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer focus on targeting microRNAs, epigenetic alterations and genetic polymorphisms.
| S-EPMC4356326 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Affinity fingerprints report the activity of small molecules across a set of assays, and thus permit to gather information about the bioactivities of structurally dissimilar compounds, where models based on chemical structure alone are often limited, and model complex biological endpoints, such as human toxicity and in vitro cancer cell line sensitivity. Here, we propose to model in vitro compound activity using computationally predicted bioactivity profiles as compound descriptors. To this aim, we apply and validate a framework for the calculation of QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (QAFFP) using a set of 1360 QSAR models generated using Ki, Kd, IC50 and EC50 data from ChEMBL database. QAFFP thus represent a method to encode and relate compounds on the basis of their similarity in bioactivity space. To benchmark the predictive power of QAFFP we assembled IC50 data from ChEMBL database for 18 diverse cancer cell lines widely used in preclinical drug discovery, and 25 diverse protein target data sets. This study complements part 1 where the performance of QAFFP in similarity searching, scaffold hopping, and bioactivity classification is evaluated. Despite being inherently noisy, we show that using QAFFP as descriptors leads to errors in prediction on the test set in the ~ 0.65-0.95 pIC50 units range, which are comparable to the estimated uncertainty of bioactivity data in ChEMBL (0.76-1.00 pIC50 units). We find that the predictive power of QAFFP is slightly worse than that of Morgan2 fingerprints and 1D and 2D physicochemical descriptors, with an effect size in the 0.02-0.08 pIC50 units range. Including QSAR models with low predictive power in the generation of QAFFP does not lead to improved predictive power. Given that the QSAR models we used to compute the QAFFP were selected on the basis of data availability alone, we anticipate better modeling results for QAFFP generated using more diverse and biologically meaningful targets. Data sets and Python code are publicly available at https://github.com/isidroc/QAFFP_regression .
| S-EPMC7339533 | biostudies-literature