Dataset Information

Whole Genome Sequencing and Haplotyping of Blastocyst Biopsies

ABSTRACT:

Current methods available for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos do not detect de novo. Detection of these types of mutations requires whole genome sequencing (WGS). In this study advanced massively parallel WGS was performed on three 5-10 cell biopsies from two blastocyst-stage embryos. Overall, greater than 95% of each genome was called and experimentally derived haplotypes and barcoded read data were used to detect and phase up to 82% of de novo single base mutations with a false positive rate of ~1 error per Gb. These results suggest that phased WGS using barcoded DNA could be used in the future as part of the PGD process to maximize comprehensiveness in detecting disease causing mutations and reduce the incidence of genetic diseases.

PROVIDER: phs000858 | dbGaP |

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA272645PRJNA272644

REPOSITORIES: dbGaP

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	GapExchange_phs000858.v1.p1.xml	Xml
	dbGaPEx2.1.5.xsd	Other
	Study_Report.phs000858.BlastocystBiopsies.v1.p1.MULTI.pdf	Pdf
	manifest_phs000858.BlastocystBiopsies.v1.p1.c2.HMB-IRB.pdf	Pdf
	datadict_v2.xsl	Other

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 15

Similar Datasets

Project description:Microarray data analysis Intensity of 21,939 gene features per array was extracted from scanned microarray images using Feature Extraction 5.1.1 software (Agilent Technologies), which performs background subtractions and dye normalization. This normalization method is targeted at detecting changes in relative expression of individual genes rather than global expression. Global expression change would require external normalization controls (van de Peppel et al., 2003). Text output was processed using an application developed in-house to perform ANOVA analysis (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/ANOVA/). Intensity of features measured with a >50% error were replaced with missing values except features with very low intensity. Surrogate values equal to mean error were inserted for values that were negative or less than the probe error. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with embryonic stage as a factor. The small number of biological replications typical in expression profiling experiments results in a highly variable error variance, and this problem is usually addressed by log-ratio thresholds (Schena et al., 1995) that require subjective decisions about biological significance, or by Bayesian adjustment of error variance (Baldi and Long, 2001), which may still underestimate error variance and result in false positive results. To reduce false-positives, we opted for a very conservative error model in which error variance that is used for estimating F-statistics is the maximum of the actual error variance for this gene and the average error variance in 500 genes with similar average intensity. Statistical significance was determined using the False Discovery Rate (FDR = 10%) method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Pair-wise mean comparison was done with t-statistics and FDR=10%. Further data processing including scatter plots, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis (PCA) were also performed through NIA microarray analysis tool (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/ANOVA/). The input file for NIA microarray analysis tool is available at http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/microarray/data.html

Project description:Feature Extraction 5.1.1 software (Agilent Technologies) performs background subtractions and dye normalization. This normalization method is targeted at detecting changes in relative expression of individual genes rather than global expression. Global expression change would require external normalization controls (van de Peppel et al., 2003). Text output was processed using an application developed in-house to perform ANOVA analysis (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/ANOVA/). Intensity of features measured with a >50% error were replaced with missing values except features with very low intensity. Surrogate values equal to mean error were inserted for values that were negative or less than the probe error. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with embryonic stage as a factor. The small number of biological replications typical in expression profiling experiments results in a highly variable error variance, and this problem is usually addressed by log-ratio thresholds (Schena et al., 1995) that require subjective decisions about biological significance, or by Bayesian adjustment of error variance (Baldi and Long, 2001), which may still underestimate error variance and result in false positive results. To reduce false-positives, we opted for a very conservative error model in which error variance that is used for estimating F-statistics is the maximum of the actual error variance for this gene and the average error variance in 500 genes with similar average intensity. Statistical significance was determined using the False Discovery Rate (FDR = 10%) method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). Pair-wise mean comparison was done with t-statistics and FDR=10%. Further data processing including scatter plots, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis (PCA) were also performed through NIA microarray analysis tool (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/ANOVA/). Details are described in the publication (Hamatani T. et al., Developmental Cell. Published online Dec. 18, 2003).

Dataset Information

Whole Genome Sequencing and Haplotyping of Blastocyst Biopsies

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets