Coordinated Endoscopic Colorectal Cancer Screening
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Preventive Health Services,Colorectal Neoplasms
PROVIDER: 2029046 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:We compared transcriptome of iPSC-macrophages differentiated by adherence and spinner systems to determine if there is discrapency between the systems
2024-01-18 | GSE223749 | GEO
Project description:We plan to study whether the impact of offering the choice of a pre-colonoscopy physician visit or direct referral to colonoscopy will increase adherence to colonoscopy relative to usual care in a large fecal immunochemical test (FIT) mailing campaign.
We will evaluate two study options, usual care during which patients will be required to have an office visit with wither a PCP or a Gastroenterologist prior to being scheduled for a colonoscopy, or a choice where patients will be given the option of a pre-colonoscopy visit with a gastroenterologist or PCP vs. direct referral for a colonoscopy.
In these two options we will examine colonoscopy adherence, adequacy of triage, patient satisfaction, colonoscopy outcomes (no show rate, prep quality, and pain during colonoscopy) and how insurance coverage, gender, race, education or patient understanding of colon cancer screening message during the navigation process might impact outcomes.
| 2227626 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:The objective of this study is to test whether a culturally-tailored in-office based intervention have impact on increasing Chinese physician’s recommendation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to their nonadherent Chinese patients.
Special aims are to:
1. Evaluate the efficacy of a culturally-tailored physician intervention on increasing non-adherent Chinese American’s patients’ CRC screening rate.
2. Identify factors that mediate or moderate the intervention effects. For example, patients who hold an eastern cultural view or are less acculturated will be more likely to benefit from the intervention than patients who hold a western view or who are more acculturated.
| 2101775 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Family health history can help identify patients at higher than average risk for disease. There is no standardized system for collecting and updating family health history, using this information to determine a patient’s disease risk level, and providing screening recommendations to patients and providers. Patients will enter their family health history into MeTree, a family history software program. The program will produce screening recommendations tailored to the patient’s family health history. The investigators will examine whether this process increases physician referrals for, and patient uptake of, guideline-recommended screening for colorectal cancer.
| 2174941 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This is a Phase 2 prospective, randomized, controlled, double-arm study to assess personalized self-management training (PSMT) intervention efficacy and patient experiences compared to standardized self-management training (SSMT). A total of 120 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to complete a 6-week self-management training program (either PSMT or SSMT) to be carried out by licensed occupational therapists with doctoral training.
This study aims to examine whether PSMT is more effective in increasing adherence to healthy behavior recommendations compared to SSMT in CRC patients.
| 70599 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of chromosomal microarray (CMA) on the management of paediatric patients in Hong Kong Methods: We performed NimbleGen 135k oligonucleotide array on 327 children with intellectual disability (ID)/ developmental delay (DD), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MCAs) in a university-affiliated paediatric unit from January 2011 to May 2013. The medical records of patients were reviewed in September 2013, focusing on the pathogenic/likely pathogenic CMA findings and their “clinical actionability” based on established criteria. Results: Thirty-seven patients were reported to have pathogenic/likely pathogenic results, while 40 had findings of unknown significance. This gives a detection rate of 11% for clinically significant (pathogenic/likely pathogenic) findings. The significant findings have prompted clinical actions in 28 out of 37 patients (75.7%), while the findings with unknown significance have led to further management recommendation in only 1 patient (p<0.001). Nineteen out of the 28 management recommendations are “evidence-based” on either practice guidelines endorsed by a professional society (n=9, Level 1) or peer-reviewed publications making medical management recommendation (n=10, Level 2). CMA results impact medical management by precipitating referral to a specialist (n=24); diagnostic testing (n=24), surveillance of complications (n=19), interventional procedure (n=7), medication (n=15) or lifestyle modification (n=12).
2014-08-31 | E-MTAB-2883 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of chromosomal microarray (CMA) on the management of paediatric patients in Hong Kong Methods: We performed NimbleGen 135k oligonucleotide array on 327 children with intellectual disability (ID)/ developmental delay (DD), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MCAs) in a university-affiliated paediatric unit from January 2011 to May 2013. The medical records of patients were reviewed in September 2013, focusing on the pathogenic/likely pathogenic CMA findings and their “clinical actionability” based on established criteria. Results: Thirty-seven patients were reported to have pathogenic/likely pathogenic results, while 40 had findings of unknown significance. This gives a detection rate of 11% for clinically significant (pathogenic/likely pathogenic) findings. The significant findings have prompted clinical actions in 28 out of 37 patients (75.7%), while the findings with unknown significance have led to further management recommendation in only 1 patient (p<0.001). Nineteen out of the 28 management recommendations are “evidence-based” on either practice guidelines endorsed by a professional society (n=9, Level 1) or peer-reviewed publications making medical management recommendation (n=10, Level 2). CMA results impact medical management by precipitating referral to a specialist (n=24); diagnostic testing (n=24), surveillance of complications (n=19), interventional procedure (n=7), medication (n=15) or lifestyle modification (n=12).
2014-09-04 | E-MTAB-2884 | biostudies-arrayexpress