Timing to Minimally Invasive Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Rectal Neoplasms,Colorectal Cancer,Rectal Cancer
PROVIDER: 2268388 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:Sacrocolpopexy has been dubbed the “gold standard” repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study sought to determine a genetic cause for sacrocolpopexy failure by comparing genotypes from 10 women who suffered from early POP reoccurance after sacrocolpopexy surgery, versus 40 randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure. We objectively defined early overt failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as having a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system examination (POP-Q) of stage III or IV occurring in more than one compartment within six months after surgery. All medical records identified during this process were then reviewed by a panel of urogynecology attendings and fellows to select patients who were truly clinical outliers. By this method we identified 10 patients (cases) who experienced early overt surgical failure. We also randomly selected 40 controls from our research database which includes greater than 500 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy during the same time period and had been objectively and subjectively assessed for ≥ 12 months with surgical success at ≥ 12 months that did not undergo prolapse re-operation or re-treatment. Demographics and peri-operative details were compared between cases and controls. Exclusion criteria for controls included use of other graft material besides polypropylene mesh, prior surgery for prolapse involving graft material, and conversion to laparotomy. DNA from the 10 cases and 40 controls was isolated from buccal swabs and genotyped on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array that contains 250,000 markers (NspI 250K SNP array, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). All women in this study identified as Caucasian. All subjects provided written informed consent to study participation and data release. This was a case-control study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Atlantic Health System in Morristown New Jersey (R11-10-004).
2016-06-01 | GSE63236 | GEO
Project description:Sacrocolpopexy has been dubbed the âgold standardâ repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study sought to determine a genetic cause for sacrocolpopexy failure by comparing genotypes from 10 women who suffered from early POP reoccurance after sacrocolpopexy surgery, versus 40 randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure. We objectively defined early overt failure after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as having a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system examination (POP-Q) of stage III or IV occurring in more than one compartment within six months after surgery. All medical records identified during this process were then reviewed by a panel of urogynecology attendings and fellows to select patients who were truly clinical outliers. By this method we identified 10 patients (cases) who experienced early overt surgical failure. We also randomly selected 40 controls from our research database which includes greater than 500 patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy during the same time period and had been objectively and subjectively assessed for ⥠12 months with surgical success at ⥠12 months that did not undergo prolapse re-operation or re-treatment. Demographics and peri-operative details were compared between cases and controls. Exclusion criteria for controls included use of other graft material besides polypropylene mesh, prior surgery for prolapse involving graft material, and conversion to laparotomy. DNA from the 10 cases and 40 controls was isolated from buccal swabs and genotyped on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array that contains 250,000 markers (NspI 250K SNP array, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). All women in this study identified as Caucasian. All subjects provided written informed consent to study participation and data release. This was a case-control study approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Atlantic Health System in Morristown New Jersey (R11-10-004). This case-control study compared single genotypes of 10 cases to 40 controls. All subjects were identified as Caucasian. Cases were women who experienced early overt POP recurrence after robotic sacrocolpopexy, and controls were randomly selected women with long term success after the same procedure.
2016-06-01 | E-GEOD-63236 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical procedures for the treatment of Rectal Cancer: Laparoscopic Surgery and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. The ROLARR study is for participants with cancer of the rectum for whom a laparoscopic operation (sometimes called "keyhole surgery") has been recommended by their surgeon.
In the past most rectal cancers were removed using "open" surgery. Open surgery involves a large cut down the middle of the patient’s abdomen to allow the surgeon to see and take out the cancer. On a previous study showed that using laparoscopic surgery to remove colorectal cancers was as good as open surgery for curing cancer.
There is now another option to remove rectal cancers, which involves using a robotic system with laparoscopic surgery. This type of surgery is called "robotic-assisted" laparoscopic surgery and is now becoming widely used by surgeons to remove cancers including the rectum, as well as for other non-cancer operations.
In order to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon sits at a robotic control unit a few feet away from the patient. Using the robotic control unit, the surgeon can see a clear video image of the patient’s abdomen and the operation site. The surgeon can perform the operation from the robotic control unit by controlling the movement of a set of robotic surgical instruments, guided by the video camera.
Like standard laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon is able to carry out the entire operation through a few small cuts in the abdomen. The camera of the robotic system provides a 3D high-definition magnified view of the operation site and the robotic system is also able to translate the movements of the surgeon’s hands into small precise movements inside the patient’s body.
We want to test whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is as good, or even better, at removing rectal cancers as standard laparoscopic surgery (actually Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is used as standard of care in rectal cancer patients at University of California, Irvine Medical Center). We also want to investigate whether using robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery reduces the number of times a laparoscopic operation needs to be converted to an open operation, and see whether using a robotic system can also shorten the length of time patients need to stay in hospital and if it reduces the number of complications patients may have during and after their operation.
| 2135815 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:We performed whole blood gene expression profiling in 26 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer stage I-III UICC. Saples were taken the day before surgery (-1), day one postoperatively (+1) and day 10 postoperatively (+10). The aim of the study was to investigate whether gene expression was altered after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.
2021-11-01 | GSE122626 | GEO
Project description:Background and study aims
This study is an observational, prospective, single-centre study comparing 2 surgical techniques used to treat rectal cancer patients. The investigated techniques will be the standard keyhole technique (also called laparoscopic or minimal invasive (MIS) surgery) and the robot-assisted technique. Robot-assisted surgery uses the robotic systems to aid the surgical procedures, providing more precision, flexibility, and control than is possible with standard keyhole technique. Our hypothesis is that this may also result in less harm to surrounding tissues.
Our main interests will be to compare the stress response after surgery and the restoration of digestive, urinary and sexual functions after surgery. We are looking to recruit 80 patients within 2 years with a follow-up period of 12 months.
Who can participate?
Adults over 18 years, diagnosed with rectal cancer
What does the study involve?
To compare the surgical stress response between the groups, we will be taking blood samples before surgery and on the first, third and fifth day after surgery (with the day of surgery being day 0). We will assess the functional outcomes through validated questionnaires filled in before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery.
The research team will also gather further information about the recovery and cancer treatment by reviewing the patient’s medical records during follow-up.
| 2753738 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This study is being done to compare two types of surgery currently used for rectal cancer. The two types of surgery are laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection and open laparotomy rectal resection. Although laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is being used for rectal cancer in some medical centers, the effectiveness of this type of surgery compared to open surgery is unknown. The study will compare the safety and effectiveness of the surgeries, recovery from surgery in the hospital, overall recovery from surgery and cancer outcome.
| 2059073 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This is a study comparing major bowel surgery done via conventional keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery with robotic assisted keyhole surgery, using the Versius robotic system. Our main objective is to assess the physical strain of both types of surgery on the operating surgeon, but we will also collect data on the patient outcomes and teamwork. This results from this study will be used to guide the design of a larger scale trial in future.
| 2406408 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This study is to validate the safety and feasibility of ArtiSential (Articulating laparoscopic instrument) colorectal surgery and compare it with robotic surgery for patients with rectal cancer and rectosigmoid junction cancer.
| 2750348 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, there are no good predictive methods. This study investigated whether specific lncRNA expression is associated with response to CRT. Tissue biopsies were obtained from patients before CRT. LncRNA expression was analyzed using one-color microarrays technique comparing signatures between good respondersand poor responders, as measured by tumour regression grade (TRG).
2020-02-22 | GSE145666 | GEO
Project description:Interventions: Two types of surgery are currently available in the treatment of rectal cancer: open laparotomy and rectal resection and laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection.
While open laparotomy (an incision into the abdomen) and surgical resection is currently the standard of care for rectal cancer, laparoscopic-assisted resection (key-hole” surgery to resect the tumour, performed under the guidance of a video camera) has emerged as a new treatment option for rectal cancer. This technique achieves removal of the rectal tumour with minimally invasive surgery, and potentially achieves better recovery and shorter stays in hospital post-operatively.
Patients will be randomised to receive one of the two surgical treatments to remove the primary rectal cancer - i.e. Open Laparotomy and Rectal Resection or Laparoscopic-assisted Rectal Resection.
Primary outcome(s): To determine whether laparoscopic-assisted resection is not inferior to open rectal resection as a safe, effective oncologic approach to rectal cancer.[Pre-operative staging and evaluation of disease will be determined by Computerised Tomography (CT) scan, and pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging) MRI or CT scan and Endorectal ultrasound. Pathology specimens obtained at surgery will be reviewed by a Pathology Review Committee to assess a composite of oncologic parameters which must be met for surgical resection to be successful. These parameters which form the primary endpoint are:
Circumferential margin greater than or equal to 1mm
Distal resected margin greater than or equal to 2cm (or greater than or equal to 1cm with clear frozen section in the low rectum)
Completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME)]
Study Design: Purpose: Treatment; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Open (masking not used);Assignment: Parallel;Type of endpoint: Safety/efficacy
| 2454989 | ecrin-mdr-crc