Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Colorectal Liver Metastases: Novel Assessment Tools for Technical Resectability

ABSTRACT: The CoNoR study aims to assess whether the use of the LiMAx test and the HepaT1ca pre-operative planning magnetic resonance scan impact upon technical resectability decision-making in colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

DISEASE(S): Cancer Metastatic,Neoplasm Metastasis,Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer,Colorectal Cancer,Liver Neoplasms,Cancer

PROVIDER: 2330206 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Technical controls MiCA

Project description:Technical controls MiCA

| PRJEB30293 | ENA

EMPV1 technical repeat

Project description:2-4-8 cell porcine embryo technical repeat dye-swap for Agilent EMPV1 (4x44k Format)

2013-02-25 | GSE34157 | GEO

RNA-seq: technical variability and sampling

Project description:RNA-seq: technical variability and sampling

| PRJNA234515 | ENA

RNA-seq: technical variability and sampling (male)

Project description:Background: RNA-seq is revolutionizing the way we study transcriptomes. mRNA can be surveyed without prior knowledge of gene transcripts. Alternative splicing of transcript isoforms and the identification of previously unknown exons are being reported. Initial reports of differences in exon usage, and splicing between samples as well as quantitative differences among samples are beginning to surface. Biological variation has been reported to be larger than technical variation. In addition, technical variation has been reported to be in line with expectations due to random sampling. However, strategies for dealing with technical variation will differ depending on the magnitude. The size of technical variance, and the role of sampling are examined in this manuscript. Results: Independent Solexa/Illumina experiments containing technical replicates are analyzed. When coverage is low, large disagreements between technical replicates are apparent. Exon detection between technical replicates is highly variable when the coverage is less than 5 reads per nucleotide and estimates of gene expression are more likely to disagree when coverage is low. Although large disagreements in the estimates of expression are observed at all levels of coverage. Conclusions: Technical variability is too high to ignore. Technical variability results in inconsistent detection of exons at low levels of coverage. Further, the estimate of the relative abundance of a transcript can substantially disagree, even when coverage levels are high. This may be due to the low sampling fraction and if so, it will persist as an issue needing to be addressed in experimental design even as the next wave of technology produces larger numbers of reads. We provide practical recommendations for dealing with the technical variability, without dramatic cost increases.

2014-01-15 | GSE54068 | GEO

RNA-seq: technical variability and sampling (female)

2014-01-15 | GSE54067 | GEO

DNA methylation profiles of liver and placenta technical replicates

Project description:We profiled DNA from liver and placenta technical replicate samples on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. There technical replicates represent a single liver and a single placenta sample.

2014-02-19 | GSE52731 | GEO

Evaluation of technical (array-to-array) reproducibility of L. vannamei microarray

Project description:Five aliquots of the same RNA sample were labeled and hybridized in parallel to the L. vannamei microarray, in order to assess the technical reproducibility of the tool Keywords: technical validation

2006-06-01 | GSE4954 | GEO

BEARscc: robustness of single-cell clusters determined using simulated technical replicates

Project description:Technical variance is a major confounding factor in single-cell RNA sequencing, not least because measurements on the same cell are not replicable. We developed BEARscc, a tool that simulates experiment-specific technical replicates based on a probabilistic model of technical variance trained on RNA spike-in measurements. We demonstrate that the tool improves the unsupervised classification of cells and aids the interpretation of single-cell RNA-seq experiments.

2018-04-03 | GSE95155 | GEO

A novel approach uncovering the biological signal in Hi-C data affected by technical biases

Project description:The chromatin interaction assays, particularly Hi-C, enabled detailed studies of chromatin architecture in multiple organisms and model systems, resulting in a deeper understanding of gene expression regulation mediated by epigenetics mechanisms. However, the analysis and interpretation of Hi-C data remain challenging due to technical biases, limiting direct comparisons of datasets obtained in different experiments and laboratories. As a result, removing biases from Hi-C-generated chromatin contact matrices is a critical data analysis step. Our novel approach HiConfidence eliminates biases from the Hi-C data by weighing chromatin contacts according to their consistency between replicates so that low-quality replicates do not influence the result. The algorithm is effective for the analysis of global changes in chromatin structures such as compartments and TADs. We apply the HiConfidence approach to several Hi-C datasets with significant technical biases that could not be analyzed effectively using existing methods, and obtain meaningful biological conclusions. In particular, HiConfidence aids in the study of how changes in the histone acetylation pattern affect chromatin organization in Drosophila cells.

2023-02-05 | GSE200078 | GEO

Navigating Illumina Methylation Data: Biology vs. Technical Artefacts

Project description:Navigating Illumina Methylation Data: Biology vs. Technical Artefacts

| PRJNA1121897 | ENA