Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Colon Cancer,Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms,Rectal Cancer
PROVIDER: 2349945 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:* Compared with traditional open colectomy, laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, earlier recovery, and better cosmetic outcome, and its short- and long-term oncologic outcomes have been demonstrated.
* In experienced surgeons’ hands, single incision laparoscopic surgery is increasingly performed for colorectal disease, and even for malignant lesion because of its reduced incision-associated morbidity and scarring.
* However, the safety and efficacy of single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has not yet been evaluated. Thus, the prospective randomized trial comparing single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is needed.
| 2164998 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after single incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer（SILSC） compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer（CLSC）.
| 2281250 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Acute pain after surgery is still managed insufficiently. One major need is, therefore, the identification of new targets specifically relevant for postoperative pain to develop effective and non-addictive analgesics. To this end, we have used the plantar incision model in male mice and DIA-MS to reveal unprecedented insights into proteome dynamics in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) 24 hours after incision.
2021-09-09 | PXD022706 | Pride
Project description:Laparoscopic colon surgery has been performed widely. As a minimal invasive approach, single incision (Embryonic NOTES) colon surgery has been attempted.
However, there are not sufficient evidences for single incision colon surgery in colon cancer.
The investigators are researching the efficacy and safety of single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in sigmoid colon cancer.
| 2100226 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is the further development of the concept of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer,which rapidly developed in the field of colorectal surgery. Through the development of single hole laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery and clinical study and follow up accordingly, evaluating the feasibility, surgical effectiveness and economy help to promote the popularization and application of single hole laparoscopic techniques in the field.
| 2244269 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This study is being done to evaluate single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal diseases, compared to multi-port laparoscopic surgery. This study is also intended to standardize the SILS technique for colorectal diseases
| 2129757 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:This study compares the gene expression changes in Sus scrofa in response to two different methods for abdominal surgical incisions ; electrosurgery and harmonic blade. As the use of laparoscopic surgery has become more widespread in recent years, the need has increased for minimally-invasive surgical devices that effectively cut and coagulate tissue with reduced tissue trauma. Although electrosurgery (ES) has been used for many generations, newly-developed ultrasonic devices (HARMONIC® Blade, HB) have been shown at a macroscopic level to offer better coagulation with less thermally-induced tissue damage. We sought to understand the differences between ES and HB at a microscopic level by comparing mRNA transcript and protein responses at the 3-day timepoint to incisions made by the devices in subcutaneous fat tissue in a porcine model
2013-12-15 | GSE47710 | GEO
Project description:Conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for colorectal cancer has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible and present minimally invasive benefits including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay, also acquiring comparable oncologic outcomes with open surgery. To achieve further minimally invasive outcomes, SILS plus one port surgery was attempted by some surgeons. Preliminary results showed that SILS+1 could achieve better minimally invasive benefits than CLS while preserving oncologic feasibility.
Till now, ERAS has been practiced in colorectal cancer surgery for approximately 20 years. Studies have proven that ERAS is safe and significantly improved the recovery course of patients during perioperative period, meanwhile, the expense could be greatly reduced.
Based on ERAS studies protocols and SILS+1 trials, investigators tried to combine SILS+1 with ERAS, hopefully to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.
| 2330011 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:BackgroundPrevious meta-analyses that compared the outcome of SILC and CLC have not presented consistent conclusions. This meta-analysis was performed after adding many recent RCTs, to clarify this issue.MethodsRelevant articles published in English were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register from January 1997 to February 2013. Reference lists of the retrieved articles were reviewed to identify additional articles. Primary outcomes (postoperative pain scores, cosmetic score, and length of incision) and secondary outcomes (operating time, blood loss, conversion rates, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, time to initial oral intake, and time to resume work) were pooled. Quantitative variables were calculated using the weighted mean difference (WMD), and qualitative variables were pooled using odds ratios (OR).Results25 appropriate RCTs were identified from 2128 published articles. 1841 patients were treated, 944 with SILC and 897 with CLC. SILC was superior to CLC in cosmetic score (WMD = 1.155, P<0.001), shorter length of incision (WMD = -3.285, P = 0.029), and postoperative pain within 12 h (VAS in 3-4 h, WMD = -0.704, P = 0.026; VAS in 6-8 h, WMD = -0.613, P = 0.010). CLC was superior to SILC in operating time (OT) (WMD = 13.613, P<0.001) and need of additional instruments (OR = 7.448, P<0.001). Other secondary outcomes were similar.ConclusionsSILC offered a better cosmetic result and less postoperative pain for patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis or polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. However, SILC was associated with a longer OT and required additional instruments.
| S-EPMC3788730 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study compares the gene expression changes in Sus scrofa in response to two different methods for abdominal surgical incisions ; electrosurgery and harmonic blade. As the use of laparoscopic surgery has become more widespread in recent years, the need has increased for minimally-invasive surgical devices that effectively cut and coagulate tissue with reduced tissue trauma. Although electrosurgery (ES) has been used for many generations, newly-developed ultrasonic devices (HARMONIC® Blade, HB) have been shown at a macroscopic level to offer better coagulation with less thermally-induced tissue damage. We sought to understand the differences between ES and HB at a microscopic level by comparing mRNA transcript and protein responses at the 3-day timepoint to incisions made by the devices in subcutaneous fat tissue in a porcine model This study used four 4-cm midline caudal abdominal incisions created with the test devices in two female pigs. The test devices were monopolar electrosurgery and Harmonic blade. Each animal had two Harmonic Blade incisions and two Electrosurgery incisions for a total of 8 incisions
2013-12-15 | E-GEOD-47710 | biostudies-arrayexpress