Prediction of Gastric Cancer in Intestinal Metaplasia and Atrophic Gastritis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Intestinal Metaplasia,Atrophy,Metaplasia,Atrophic Gastritis,Gastric Cancer,Gastritis, Atrophic,Stomach Neoplasms,Gastritis
PROVIDER: 2373934 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: Nodular gastritis (NG) is characterized by marked antral lymphoid follicle formation, and is a strong risk factor for diffuse-type gastric cancer in adults. However, it is unknown whether aberrant DNA methylation, which is induced by atrophic gastritis (AG) and is a risk for gastric cancer, is induced by NG. Here, we analyzed methylation induction by NG. Methods: Gastric mucosal samples were obtained from non-cancerous antral tissues of 16 NG and 20 AG patients with gastric cancer and 5 NG and 6 AG patients without, all age- and gender-matched. Genome-wide methylation analysis and expression analysis were conducted by a BeadChip array and RNA-sequencing, respectively. Results: Clustering analysis of non-cancerous antral tissues of NG and AG patients with gastric cancer was conducted using methylation levels of 585 promoter CpG islands (CGIs) of methylation-resistant genes, and a large fraction of NG samples formed a cluster with strong methylation induction. Promoter CGIs of CDH1 and DAPK1 tumor-suppressor genes were more methylated in NG than in AG. Notably, methylation levels of these genes were also higher in the antrum of NG patients without cancer. Genes related to lymphoid follicle formation, such as CXCL13/CXCR5 and CXCL12/CXCR4, had higher expression in NG, and genes involved in DNA demethylation TET2 and IDH1, had only half the expression in NG. Conclusions: Severe aberrant methylation, involving multiple tumor-suppressor genes, was induced in the gastric antrum and body of patients with NG, in accordance with their high gastric cancer risk.
2024-08-27 | GSE211463 | GEO
Project description:We identified several hub genes and key pathways associated with GC and IM initiation and progression by analyzing the DEGs, which provided a detailed molecular mechanism underlying GC and IM occurrence and progression.
2022-12-30 | GSE191275 | GEO
Project description:Background & Aims: Tissue metaplasia is uncommon in adults because established cis-element programs resist rewiring. In Barrett’s esophagus, the distal esophageal mucosa acquires predominantly intestinal character, with notable gastric features, and is predisposed to develop invasive cancers. We sought to understand the chromatin underpinnings of Barrett’s metaplasia and why it commonly displays simultaneous gastric and intestinal properties. Methods: We profiled cis-regulatory elements with active histone modifications in primary human biopsy materials using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq). Mutations in Barrett’s esophagus were examined in relation to tissue-specific enhancer landscapes using a random-forest machine learning algorithm. We also profiled open chromatin at single-cell resolution in primary Barrett’s biopsy specimens using the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC-seq). We used one- and two-color immunohistochemistry to examine protein expression of tissue-restricted genes. Results: Barrett’s esophagus bears epigenome fingerprints of human stomach and intestinal columnar, but not esophageal squamous, epithelia. Mutational patterns were best explained as arising on the epigenome background of active gastric cis-elements, supporting the view that adjoining stomach epithelium is a likely tissue source. Individual cells in Barrett’s metaplasia co-express gastric and intestinal genes, reflecting concomitant chromatin access at enhancers ordinarily restricted to one or the other epithelium. Protein expression of stomach-specific mucins, CLDN18, and a novel gastric marker, ANXA10, revealed extensive tissue and sub-clonal heterogeneity of dual stomach-intestinal cell states. Conclusions: These findings reveal mixed and dynamic tissue-restricted chromatin states and phenotypic heterogeneity in Barrett’s esophagus. Pervasive intra-gland variation argues against stem-cell governance of this phenotype.
2021-06-03 | GSE97178 | GEO
Project description:Using RNA sequencing, we profile transcriptome dervied from human normal gastric, intestinal and IM organoids.
2024-10-15 | GSE210993 | GEO
Project description:Reflux of bile acids and subsequent caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) activation contribute to gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM), which is a precursor of gastric cancer. However, the underlying mechanism by which bile acids cause this is not entirely clear. Here we demonstrated that alkylation repair homolog protein 5 (ALKBH5), which is a major RNA N6-adenosine demethylase, was required for bile acid-induced gastric IM. Mechanistically, we revealed the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification profile in gastric IM for the first time and identified ZNF333 as a bona fide m6A target of ALKBH5. ALKBH5 was shown to demethylate ZNF333 mRNA, leading to enhanced ZNF333 expression by abolishing m6A-YTHDF2-dependent mRNA degradation. In addition, ALKBH5 activated CDX2 and downstream intestinal markers by targeting the ZNF333/CYLD axis and activating NF-κB signaling. Reciprocally, p65, which is the key transcription factor of the canonical NF-κB pathway, enhanced the transcription activity of ALKBH5 in the nucleus, thus forming a positive feed-forward circuit. In addition, ALKBH5 levels were positively correlated with ZNF333 and CDX2 in IM tissues, indicating a significant clinical relevance. Collectively, our findings suggest an m6A modification-associated positive feed-forward loop between ALKBH5 and NF-κB signaling is involved in the generation of the IM phenotype from gastric epithelial cells. Targeting the ALKBH5/ZNF333/CYLD/CDX2 axis might be a useful therapeutic strategy for gastric IM in patients with bile regurgitation.
2021-10-14 | GSE179185 | GEO
Project description:Metaplasia of the gastric epithelia (intestinal metaplasia, IM) is a pre-malignant lesion associated with increased gastric cancer (GC) risk.
2018-01-09 | GSE103186 | GEO
Project description:Using DNA methylation array, we profiled epigentic changes of human gastric, intestinal and IM organoids.
2024-10-15 | GSE210994 | GEO
Project description:Genome wide mRNA expression profiling of 14 gastric IM samples derived from an Australian based cohort was performed.
2021-02-28 | GSE160116 | GEO
Project description:Intestinal metaplasia (IM), precancerous lesions of gastric carcinoma (PLGC) induced by factors like nitrite, Helicobacter pylori, or bile acid, carries a high risk of progressing to gastric cancer. IM is categorized into complete intestinal metaplasia (CIM) and incomplete intestinal metaplasia (IIM). Patients with IIM are at a higher risk of developing gastric cancer, emphasizing its importance for early screening. Besides the diagnostic challenges, the mechanisms underlying its progression remain a mystery. OLFM4, a gene associated with stemness characteristics, has been linked to promoting gastric and colorectal cancers. Our investigation used pathological sections from two clinical centers, biopsies of IM tissues, PLGC cell models, animal models, and organoids to explore OLFM4's role in IIM. OLFM4 expression was observed highly in IIM, with superior diagnostic accuracy of IIM compared to CDX2 and MUC2 for the first time. OLFM4, along with MYH9, was highly expressed in IM organoids and PLGC animal models. OLFM4, in combination with MYH9, accelerated the ubiquitination of GSK3β and resulted in increased β-catenin levels through the Wnt signaling pathway, finally promoting the proliferation and invasion abilities of PLGC cells. In conclusion, OLFM4 serves as a novel biomarker for IIM and is utilized as an important auxiliary means to delimit the key population for early gastric cancer screening. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms of progression and a new target of therapy in intestinal metaplasia.
2024-01-01 | GSE251765 | GEO
Project description:Background: Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is a gastric precancerous lesion that precedes the development of gastric cancer in up to 3.77 cases/1000 person-years. It consists in a trans-differentiation process of gastric to intestinal tissue. Two histological subtypes exist, complete (CIM) and incomplete (IIM), the latter having higher progression rates to gastric cancer . Our objective was to identify molecular processes responsible for the tumoral transition from intestinal metaplasia to GC and the initial steps of this lesion Methods: We used expression microarray to compare the transcriptome of intestinal metaplasia subtypes that progress to gastric cancer (IIM-GC and CIM-GC) after a follow-up period with respect to those that do not progress (IIM control and CIM control). Also, IM-NoGC (IM control, comprising both IIM and CIM Control) was compared with healthy gastric mucosa. Differentially expressed genes were obtained and functional analyses (GSEA and IPA softwares) were performed. Some deregulated genes were validated by qPCR. Results: Histological subtypes of intestinal metaplasia that progress or not to GC differ less among them than to healthy mucosa. Incomplete intestinal metaplasia has a higher number of over-expressed carcinogenic genes and molecular processes than the complete subtype. Most relevant molecular processes and genes in this group include antigenic processing, inflammation, activation of cell cycle and cell proliferation, oncogenes and tumor suppressors. When IM-NoGC is compared with healthy gastric mucosa new identified transcripts include TRIM, TMEM, homeobox, transporters and nucleolar RNAs SNORDs116. We confirm previously reported processes such us intestinal differentiation, metabolism of lipids and of xenobiotics and identify new ones such as non tumoral Warburg effect and melatonin degradation. Conclusions: Differentially expressed genes and molecular processes have been identified for the first time in intestinal metaplasia that progress to gastric cancer. New genes and molecular processes have also been identified in intestinal metaplasia in comparison with healthy gastric mucosa.
2017-06-12 | GSE78523 | GEO