Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

TES RCT Fleet Enema vs Oral Mechanical Bowel Prep

ABSTRACT: There is no consensus about the best bowel preparation prior to transanal endoscopic surgery TES). Cleanliness and visibility in the rectosigmoid and rectum are of utmost importance, possibly even more so than during colonoscopy, to facilitate safe, precise and efficient resection of the rectal lesion and potentially adequate closure of the defect. Both Fleet enemas and oral mechanical bowel preparation are considered standard of care in preparation for TES. This single center two arm single blinded randomized controlled trial will compare the effectiveness of Fleet enemas in comparison to Pico Salax oral mechanical bowel preparation in cleansing the rectum as measured by a modified version of the Ottawa Bowel Prep Scale.

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Neoplasms

PROVIDER: 2397656 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Bowel Preparation Impact on the Intestinal Microbiome: Oral Preparation vs Enema

Project description:Mechanical bowel preparation for left-sided colorectal surgery remains standard in most cases. However, there are some discrepancies on how to prepare the bowl, while rectal enema and oral agents are both available methods. The knowledge of intestinal microbiome role on surgical outcomes is increasing, since few recent reports linked microbiome composition to postoperative complications, such as anastomotic insufficiency. Although, it is not clear how the bowel preparation affects the gut microbiome. Therefore, different bowel preparation techniques impact on gut microbiome will be studied.

| 2310459 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Colon Cancer Surgery

Project description:This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or no colonic preparation. Our Hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic colon cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone, oral antibiotics alone, or no colonic preparation.

| 2269131 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Before Rectal Cancer Surgery

Project description:This study aims to demonstrate that a preoperative combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics, before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, is associated with a reduction of postoperative surgical site infection rate, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone Our hypothesis is that a preoperative colonic preparation including a combination of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics before elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with a reduced rate of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, as compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone

| 2270348 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Short-term Outcomes of Full Bowel Preparation (MBP+OA) for Rectal Resections for Cancer Versus MBP Alone

Project description:The purpose of the study is to determine if short-term outcomes of rectal resections after full bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotics) are superior to rectal resections with only mechanical bowel preparation.

| 2354896 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Performance of NER1008 Enema Compared With Fleet Enema in Bowel Cleansing

Project description:In order for flexible sigmoidoscopy to be a successful screening procedure, the bowel must be free of solid matter so the endoscopist has a clear view, increasing the chance of detection of abnormalities. This is achieved through the use of bowel cleansing preparations, which are administered prior to the procedure. Enemas are the preferred method as they clear the lower bowel more quickly than oral formulations and do not require dietary restrictions. The medical device being tested in this clinical investigation is NER1008, an enema which contains PEG3350 (polyethylene glycol 3350). PEG3350 is an osmotic agent, which holds the water content in the rectum and sigmoid colon, consequently increasing stool volume, resulting in rectal distension and subsequent distal colon emptying. The increased colonic luminal content stimulates the motility, propulsive transportation and rectal evacuation of the distal colon content. This study is designed to assess the performance of NER1008 in bowel cleansing and compare this with the performance of Fleet enema, which is widely used for this purpose.

| 2191902 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparison of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Versus Enema for Candidates to Colorectal Resection for Adenocarcinoma

Project description:The purpose of this study is to evaluate mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) with polyethylene glycol plus bowel enema versus bowel enema alone in patients candidates to colorectal resection for malignancy.

| 2075204 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Oral Antibiotics Versus Mechanical Bowel Preparation Only Prior Rectal Surgery

Project description:MOBILE2 is a randomized controlled trial comparing mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation to mechanical bowel preparation only in patients undergoing anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis. Primary endpoint is Comprehensive Complication Index within 30 days from surgery.

| 2331037 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Short-term Outcomes of Full Bowel Preparation (MBP+OA) for Colon Cancer Resections Versus no Bowel Preparation

Project description:The purpose of the study is to determine if short-term outcomes of colon resections after full bowel preparation (mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotics) are superior to colon resections with no bowel preparation.

| 2748859 | ecrin-mdr-crc

infectious surgical site complications after oral antibiotic bowel preparation for minimally-invasive rectal cancer surgery

Project description:Interventions: Drug : 1. experimental group (A) - mechanical bowel preparation (PEG) + IV antibiotics 2. control group (B) - mechanical bowel preparation (PEG) + IV antibiotics + oral antibiotics (rifaximin + metronidazole) 3. pre-operative preparation 3.1. mechanical bowel preparation - PEG prefered - water only permitted on the day before operation 3.2. oral antibiotics - 14, 16, 22 hour the day before surgery - 400mg rifaximin + 500mg metronidazole 3.3. IV antibiotics - 2nd generation cephalosporin - venous injection within 30 minutes before surgery - additional dose is at the discretion of the operators Primary outcome(s): surgical site infection rate during first 30 days Primary Purpose : Prevention, Intervention Model : Factorial, Blinding/Masking : Open, Allocation : RCT

| 2512754 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Mechanical Bowel Preparation With or Without Oral Antibiotics for Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Project description:Investigation of the role of adding oral antibiotics to preoperative mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery for cancer.

| 2275878 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data