Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Effect of Low-volume (1L) vs Intermediate-volume (2L) Bowel Preparation on Cost-effectiveness and Quality of Life

ABSTRACT: Adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy is paramount for optimal diagnostic accuracy and safety. However, the need for high volumes to clean the colon often makes it difficult for patients to adhere to. Therefore, new low volume bowel preparation fluids have been developed. Little is known on the impact of these low volume bowel preparation fluids (1L), compared to intermediate-volume (2L) laxatives on quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to provide further evidence on the presumed positive effect of ultra-low volume bowel preparation on patients’ QoL and cost-effectiveness, in addition to its already demonstrated positive effect on bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Secure web-based questionnaires will be used before starting bowel preparation (baseline, t=0) and within 1 week (t=1) after colonoscopy, to assess the impact of bowel preparation on QoL and explore costs and productivity loss for cost-effectiveness analysis.

DISEASE(S): Colonic Polyps,Colorectal Cancer,Colonic Polyp

PROVIDER: 2404890 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Low-volume Bowel Preparation Methods

Project description:Colonoscopy is a common screening method to detect polyps and CRC. With the early detection of CRC through screening colonoscopy, patients could have better therapeutic effects and outcomes. In population screening programs, an increase in completed colonoscopies is related to a decrease in mortality from CRC. However, the miss rate for detecting colorectal neoplastic polyps of colonoscopy is 5-28%. The reluctance of participants to undergo bowel preparation results in the relatively low rate of detection of polyps and CRC, because poor preparation interferes with successful colon mucosa examination during a colonoscopy. Low-volume bowel preparations provide equivalent cleansing effect compared with standard 4 liter polyethylene glycol. However, studies comparing the superiority between low-volume bowel preparations are rare, and results are controversial. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing quality and tolerability between split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid.

| 2175161 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of Reduced-volume PEG Bowel Preparation Administered the Same Day of Colonoscopy

Project description:The conventional total dose of 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG) given the day before the procedure is safe and effective. It has been the standard cleansing regimen for the last 25 years. To overcome the difficulty in completing the bowel preparation due to large volume and/or taste, reduced-volume (mixed) bowel preparation of bisacodyl and 2 L of PEG have been shown to provide adequate colon cleansing and better tolerability. LoVol-esse is a reduced-volume PEG-based bowel preparation to be used in combination with bisacodyl and designed to improve patient tolerability and attitude toward bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy thanks to the reduced volume and improved taste. The present study is intended to compare the new dosing regimen of the bowel lavage solution given the same day compared with standard PEG formulation (SELG 1000) given the day before colonoscopy.

| 2120359 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparative Effectiveness of Split-Dose Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Regimens

Project description:From the patients’ perspective, the most formidable part of the colonoscopy experience is the process of bowel cleansing. A poorly tolerated bowel preparation regimen often leads to incompletion of scheduled colonoscopies which in turn undermines the effectiveness of colonoscopy, increases cost, and decreases patient satisfaction. The current standard bowel preparation in the VA is of larger volume and less palatable than another commonly used bowel preparation regimen. The investigators propose to compare these two commonly used bowel preparations with respect to the overall completion rate of scheduled colonoscopies in a real-world VA practice setting. The results of the study can be immediately applied to maximize the effectiveness of colonoscopy and increase patient satisfaction in the VA.

| 2255572 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Bulk RNA Barcoding and sequencing (BRB-seq) protocol for RNA-seq of human pre-adipocytes and differentiated adipocytes

Project description:Here, we validate a novel protocol, Bulk RNA Barcoding and sequencing (BRB-seq), that combines the multiplexing-driven cost-effectiveness of a single-cell RNA-seq protocol with the efficiency of a bulk RNA-seq procedure. For this we use BRB-seq protocol on human pre-adipocytes and differentiated adipocytes, and compare its effectiveness as compared to TruSeq. Indeed, one of the principal limitations of bulk RNA-seq is the time and costs of library preparation, which makes it difficult to profile many samples simultaneously. Here, BRB-seq produces 3’ libraries that exhibit similar gene expression quantification to TruSeq and maintain this quality even with low quality RNA samples.

2018-02-06 | E-MTAB-6469 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparations Before Colonoscopy

Project description:Polyethylene glycol is the gold standard of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. The most important disadvantage is high volume of this preparation. Sulphate based solution (SBS), low volume PEG + ascorbic acid and solution of magnesium citric acid and sodium picosulfate could be suitable substitution of polyethylene glycol.

| 2251227 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Effect of Simethicone on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Project description:Optimal bowel preparation is essential for colonoscopy efficacy and safety. Mucosal visualization during colonoscopy is often limited by residual stool, bubbles, bile, intraluminal fluid, and debris, which increase the risk of missing flat adenomas or other small lesions.Therefore, intestinal preparation is necessary to remove residual materials prior to endoscopy. A combined agent, low-dose PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc), is one low-volume solution commonly used in Korea (Coolprep; TaeJoon Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea). However, practitioners have noted an increased incidence of bubble formation with this preparation method. To the investigators knowledge, no previous study has assessed colon preparation in patients administered simethicone. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of bowel preparation and compliance between PEG-Asc and PEG-Asc with simethicone. The effectiveness of adding simethicone as an antifoaming agent to improve bowel cleansing for colonoscopy was evaluated in terms of bowel preparation scale and bubble score, and the compliance of both patients and endoscopists was also investigated using a questionnaire.

| 2198002 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Project description:Hackflex library preparation enables low-cost metagenomic profiling

| PRJNA1114129 | ENA

Genome-wide analysis of mRNA expression alterations in Stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients exhibiting clinically defined differences in ascites volume (high volume ascites versus low volume ascites)

Project description:Microarrays were used to examine gene expression changes in the surgical resections of high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients exhibiting clinically distinct levels of ascites volume. The present studies primary aim was to determine if there is a molecular gene expression difference between the patients presenting at time of surgery when high volumes ascites cases were compared to those with low volume ascites. The secondary aim was to determine what relevance this difference, if found, has to previously discovered molecular sub-types of high grade serous ovarian cancer. Total RNA obtained from snap-frozen stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients presenting with low volume (<=200 cc) or high volume (>=1000 cc) ascites volume.

2014-10-01 | E-GEOD-51831 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Two Low Volume Regimens for Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy

Project description:Colorectal cancer is the first neoplasm most commonly diagnosed in both sexes and the second leading cause of cancer death in Spain. Colorectal cancer screening Program in Barcelona was implanted in 2009 and approximately 1,500 colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies are performed annually at Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Adequate colon preparation (anterograde cleansing with laxatives) improves polyp detection, decreases examination time, and complications. There are both low and high volume intestinal regimens with polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the main active ingredient or without it. Hypothesis: Two low volumen regimens, 1L PEG plus ascorbate and magnesium citrate plus picosulphate, at starting doses have the same Adenoma Detection Rate as cleansing solutions in preparation for screening colonoscopy.

| 2332247 | ecrin-mdr-crc

An ultrafast, reliable and economical approach for quantitative salivary proteomic profiling and oral cancer biomarker discovery

Project description:Clinical biomarkers identified by shotgun proteomics require proteins in body fluids or tissues to be enzymatically digested before being separated and sequenced by Liquid Chromatography-tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). How well peptide signals can be resolved and detected is largely dependent on the quality of sample preparation. Conventional approaches such as in-gel, in-solution, and filter-based digestion, despite their extensive implementation by the community, become less appealing due to their unsatisfying protein/peptide recovery rate, lengthy sample processing, and/or less cost-effectiveness. Suspension Trapping has recently been demonstrated as an ultrafast approach for proteomics analysis. Here, for the first time, we extend its application to human salivary proteome analyses. In particular, we present a simple self-assembled glass fiber filter device, which can be packed with minimal difficulty, is extremely cost-effective and maintains the same performances as commercial filters. As a proof-of-principle, we analyzed the whole saliva from 8 healthy individuals as well as a cohort of 10 subjects of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients and non-OSCC subjects. Label-free quantification revealed surprisingly low inter-individual variability, and identified several known markers. Our study provides the first evidence of an easy-to-use and nearly cost-free device for clinical proteomics as well as for general proteome sample preparation.

2019-03-12 | PXD012436 | Pride

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data