The effect of a care program based on Roy adaptation model of nursing in colorectal cancer patients
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Malignant Neoplasm Of Colon, Unspecified,Colorectal Cancer
PROVIDER: 2488886 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients randomly enter the intervention group, and use 5 ml of the prescribed extract for 7 days from the second day of chemotherapy until the seventh course of chemotherapy. Intervention 2: Control group: Patients randomly enter the control group, and use 5 ml of the placebo for 7 days from the second day of chemotherapy until the seventh course of chemotherapy.
Primary outcome(s): . Peripheral neuropathy. Timepoint: End of day 7 after each chemotherapy course until the seventh term of chemotherapy. Method of measurement: questionnaire.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: Double blind, Blinding description: Double blind.
| 2484005 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Despite studies providing insight into the neurobiology of chronic stress, depression and anxiety, long noncoding RNA (lncRNA)-mediated mechanisms underlying the common and distinct pathophysiology of these stress-induced disorders remain nonconclusive. In a previous study, we used the chronic mild stress paradigm to separate depression-susceptible, anxiety-susceptible and insusceptible rat subpopulations. In the current study, lncRNA and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was comparatively profiled in the hippocampus of the three stress groups using microarray technology. Groupwise comparisons identified distinct sets of lncRNAs and mRNAs associated with the three different behavioral phenotypes of the stressed rats. To investigate the regulatory roles of the dysregulated lncRNAs upon mRNA expression, correlations between the differential lncRNAs and mRNAs were first analyzed by combined use of weighted gene coexpression network analysis and ceRNA theory-based methods. Subsequent functional analysis of strongly correlated mRNAs indicated that the dysregulated lncRNAs were involved in various biological pathways and processes to specifically induce rat susceptibility or resiliency to depression or anxiety. Further intersectional analysis of phenotype-associated and drug-associated lncRNA-mRNA networks and subnetworks assisted in identifying 16 hub lncRNAs as potential targets of anti-depression/anxiety drugs. Collectively, our study established the molecular basis for understanding the similarities and differences in pathophysiological mechanisms underlying stress-induced depression or anxiety and stress resiliency, revealing several important lncRNAs that represent potentially new therapeutic drug targets for depression and anxiety disorders.
2020-08-21 | GSE156580 | GEO
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group1: Coloanal End to End Anastomosis. Intervention 2: Intervention group 2: Side to End Anastomosis. Intervention 3: Intervention group 3: J poach coloanal anastomosis.
Primary outcome(s): Surgery period. Timepoint: onset to end of anesthesia. Method of measurement: Minute.;Hospital Stay. Timepoint: Discharge Time. Method of measurement: day.;Blood Loss. Timepoint: ?End of surgery. Method of measurement: CC.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Prevention, Randomization description: Simple randomization of individual by randomly drawing sealed envelopes, using a computer-based table of randomization by a surgical assistant, Blinding description: In this single-blind study, the participants were not familiar with three types of anastomosis surgery in this study. In addition, the observer, who completed the questionnaire, was not familiar with the groups. Similarly, the data analyzer did not know the study groups. However, the main researcher (surgeon) was informed about the groups, and all surgical procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The safety and data monitoring committee was also informed about the study groups.
| 2485057 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: performing 6 week chemotherapy with mFOLFOX 6 or CapeOx and then carry out surgery and continue chemotherapy for 18 weeks. Intervention 2: Control group: Initial surgery followed by chemotherapy with mFOLFOX 6 or CapeOx for 24 weeks.
Primary outcome(s): Disease Free Survival. Timepoint: One year after intervention. Method of measurement: No relapse of cancer.;Histological response and down staging of tumor. Timepoint: After surgery. Method of measurement: Pathological and radiological examination.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Triple blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: Simple randomization on individuals was performed using a table of random numbers. Allocation concealment was carried out, Blinding description: The surgeon, pathologist and radiologist are unaware of allocated groups. Besides, the outcome assessor who evaluates the quality of life is unaware of the allocated groups. The data analyser will be blinded to the intervention groups.
| 2481605 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group receives mindfulness-based stress reduction(MBSR). This is an eight-week group training program, Whit a meeting held every week for two hours, in which patients experientially practice body scan, sitting media, mindful walking, hatta yoga, mindful eating. Intervention 2: Control group doesn’t receive any intervention. The group to the questionnaires in Pre test and post test.
Primary outcome(s): Cancer related fatigue. Timepoint: Pre test and post test. Method of measurement: Fatigue questionnaire.;Cancer related cognitive impairment. Timepoint: Pre and post test. Method of measurement: Wechsler memory scale-Revised.;Fear of cancer recurrence. Timepoint: Pre and post test. Method of measurement: Fear of cancer recurrence inventory.;Self management strategies. Timepoint: Pre and post test. Method of measurement: Smart.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Not blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Other, Purpose: Supportive, Randomization description: One methods of randomization in studies is random blocking, in this way, the number of people assigned to each group is usually approximately the same. In this method, blocks are formed based on the desired variables, and within each block, half of the intervention and half as the control are considered.The main object of this method is to balance the number of participants in each group.
| 2496134 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Research on the Transcendental Meditation (TM) technique suggests it is a powerful intervention for reducing the unwanted effects of stress. Investigations of the TM program as a therapeutic intervention include cardiovascular disease (CVD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety disorders. Healthcare utilization studies show reductions in diseases after regular practice of the program. This study compared long-term practitioners of TM (38 ± 4 years) with non-practitioner controls. We used DNA microarray global transcriptomics technologies in Peripheral Mononuclear Blood Cells (PMBCs) to compare a non-practitioner control group (Group III) and a TM-practitioner group (Group IV). Demographically-matched groups of 6 each were studied. These results are expected to be relevant to stress and stress-related diseases such as CVD, diabetes, and PTSD.
2021-03-26 | E-MTAB-10252 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: The intervention group is subjected to peer support interventions for one month, at least twice a week by phone, and at least weekly by the Internet (virtual network) at least once a week. Intervention 2: The control group receives the same routine care and there is no intervention in it.
Primary outcome(s): Subjective well-being Score, in the Warwick Edinburgh Questionnaire. Timepoint: Before the intervention and one month after the end of the intervention. Method of measurement: Warwick Edinburgh subjective well-being Questionnaire.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Supportive, Randomization description: Patients are randomly assigned to two groups of intervention and control (using the random numbers table at www.randomization.com), Blinding description: The analyst will be unaware of the intervention and control groups and the data collected and which group it relates to.
| 2498403 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group: On the day of going to the clinic, pamphlets were given to the participants regarding the use of laxatives for bowel preparation. In the reinforced education, on the day before the colonoscopy, the time to use laxatives and adherence to a fiber-free diet were emphasized in a phone call, and reminder messages were sent to them. Also, through Instagram and WhatsApp, educational files about bowel preparation, including clips and software, were sent to them and their questions were answered. Intervention 2: Control group: On the day of going to the clinic, pamphlets were given to the participants regarding the use of laxatives for bowel preparation,.
Primary outcome(s): Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: 48 hours after colonoscopy. Method of measurement: researcher made tool for satisfaction.;Health anxiety. Timepoint: before and after education. Method of measurement: health anxiety inventory.;Bowl preparation. Timepoint: an colonoscopy. Method of measurement: The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Single blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Education/Guidance, Randomization description: Before the intervention, 40 white cards and 40 black cards were prepared. All the cards were placed in an envelope, then the cards were taken out randomly and numbered from 1 to 80 in order of removal. Then each card was placed in a sealed envelope and its number was written on the envelope. As each patient entered the study, a special envelope from number 1 to 80 was opened for him. If the card was white, the participant was assigned to the intervention group, and if the card was black, the participant was assigned to the control group, Blinding description: The training was given by Researcher A and the results were evaluated by Researcher B, who was unaware of the allocation of groups.Also, the data analyst will not know the type of intervention.
| 56030 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Stress is associated with an increased prevalence of anxiety and depression. Repeated social defeat (RSD) stress in mice increases the release of monocytes from the bone marrow that are recruited to the brain by microglia. These monocytes enhance inflammatory signaling and augment anxiety. Moreover, RSD promotes stress sensitization, in which exposure to acute stress 24 days after cessation of RSD causes anxiety recurrence. The purpose of this study was to determine whether microglia were critical to stress sensitization and exhibited altered gene expression 24 days after RSD.
2018-12-21 | GSE124169 | GEO
Project description:Intervention 1: Intervention group A: 20 patients randomly selected and placed in the resection and anastomosis group. Proximal and distal of the intestine within the ileostomy site were resected then anastomosed. Intervention 2: Intervention group B : 20 patients randomly selected and placed in the anterior repair group. Anterior intestinal defect within the ileostomy site was repaired.
Primary outcome(s): The first day of defecation. Timepoint: daily up to one week. Method of measurement: question from the patient in daily ward visits.;The first day of flatus. Timepoint: daily up to one week. Method of measurement: question from the patient in daily ward visits.;The first day of oral feeding. Timepoint: daily up to one week. Method of measurement: stariting of oral diet based on surgeons decision.;Post operation early complications. Timepoint: daily up to one month. Method of measurement: question from the patient in daily ward visits.;Post operation late complications. Timepoint: monthly up to 6 months. Method of measurement: question from the patient in monthly clinic visits.
Study Design: Randomization: Randomized, Blinding: Double blinded, Placebo: Not used, Assignment: Parallel, Purpose: Treatment, Randomization description: patients were randomly assigned into two groups using randomly permuted blocks method. random allocation sequence was generated by the online platform www.randomization.com, Blinding description: In this double-blind study, participants, collectors of results and analyzers, were blind to the study.
| 2492823 | ecrin-mdr-crc