Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A feasibility study of Oxaliplatin(L-OHP)in combination with infusional 5-FU/l-LV(FOLFOX4 regimen)for advanced colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT: Intervention name : Oxaliplatin|Fluorouracil|Levofolinate calcium Dosage And administration of the intervention : Intravenous infusion Primary outcome(s): Safety Study Design: Open-label, multicenter trial

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Cancer

PROVIDER: 2609919 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

A feasibility study of Oxaliplatin(L-OHP)in combination with infusional 5-FU/l-LV(FOLFOX4 regimen)for advanced colorectal cancer

Project description:Interventions: investigational material(s) Generic name etc : Oxaliplatin|Fluorouracil|Levofolinate calcium INN of investigational material : Therapeutic category code : 429 Other antitumor agents Dosage and Administration for Investigational material : Intravenous infusion Primary outcome(s): Safety Study Design: Open-label, multicenter trial

| 99274 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Phase II/III Trial of CPT-11/5-FU/l-LV (FOLFIRI) Versus CPT-11/TS-1 (IRIS) as Second Line Chemotherapy of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer

Project description:Intervention name : Irinotecan hydrochloride | Tegafur/Gimeracil/ Oteracil Potassium | Fluorouracil | Levofolinate Calcium Dosage And administration of the intervention : Irinotecan hydrochloride : injection, Fluorouracil : injection, Levofolinate Calcium : injection, Tegafur/Gimeracil/ Oteracil Potassium capsule : oral Primary outcome(s): Progression free survival Study Design: Open label, multicenter phase 2 / 3 study

| 2609944 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Phase II/III Trial of CPT-11/5-FU/l-LV (FOLFIRI) Versus CPT-11/TS-1 (IRIS) as Second Line Chemotherapy of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer

Project description:Interventions: investigational material(s) Generic name etc : Irinotecan hydrochloride | Tegafur/Gimeracil/ Oteracil Potassium | Fluorouracil | Levofolinate Calcium INN of investigational material : Therapeutic category code : 42- Antineoplastic agents Dosage and Administration for Investigational material : Irinotecan hydrochloride : injection, Fluorouracil : injection, Levofolinate Calcium : injection, Tegafur/Gimeracil/ Oteracil Potassium capsule : oral Primary outcome(s): Progression free survival Study Design: Open label, multicenter phase 2 / 3 study

| 97751 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Phase II Study of S-1 plus LV (1 week on and 1 week off) as First-line Treatment for Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Project description:Intervention name : S-1 (tegafur + gimeracil + oteracil potassium) INN of the intervention : S-1: tegafur, gimeracil, oteracil potassium Dosage And administration of the intervention : S-1 40-60 mg x 2/day was administered orally for one week followed by one week rest. Intervention name : LV (Levofolinate calcium) INN of the intervention : folic acid Dosage And administration of the intervention : LV 25 mg x 2/day was administered orally for one week along with S-1 followed by one week rest. Primary outcome(s): Efficacy, Safety Study Design: Open-label, Multi-center Study

| 2610136 | ecrin-mdr-crc

nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in post-gemcitabine metastatic pancreatic cancer: Randomized phase 2 trial in Japanese patients.

Project description:BackgroundIn the NAPOLI-1 phase 3 trial, liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) +5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly increased mPFS versus 5-FU/LV (3.1 vs. 1.5 months [unstratified HR = 0.56, p = 0.0001]) in patients with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine-based therapy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated nal-IRI+5-FU/LV tolerability (Part 1), safety, and efficacy (Part 2; outcomes reported here) in Japanese patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs. ≥90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dl vs. <4.0 g/dl). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA19-9 response, and QoL. The ITT population comprised all randomized patients.ResultsPatient characteristics differed between nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n = 40) and 5-FU/LV (n = 39) arms, including baseline hepatic lesions (63% vs. 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs. 51%), and post-study anticancer therapy (55% vs. 72%). Investigator-assessed mPFS increase with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant versus 5-FU/LV (2.7 vs. 1.5 months, HR = 0.60). Independently assessed mPFS showed similar trends (1.7 vs. 1.6 months, HR = 0.79). mOS was 6.3 months with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV and not reached with 5-FU/LV. ORR increased significantly with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV (18% vs. 0, rate difference 17.5). Commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs. 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs. 0), and diarrhea (17% vs. 3%).ConclusionsIn conclusion, clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator-assessed PFS and ORR were observed with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02697058).

| S-EPMC7774735 | biostudies-literature

Quality-adjusted survival with combination nal-IRI+5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy: a Q-TWiST analysis.

Project description:BackgroundIn the NAPOLI-1 Phase 3 trial, nal-IRI+5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) significantly improved median overall survival (6.1 vs 4.2 months, P=0.012) and progression-free survival (3.1 vs 1.5 months, P=0.0001) vs 5-FU/LV alone in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. This analysis evaluated between treatment differences in quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST).MethodsOverall survival was partitioned into time with grade ⩾3 toxicity (TOX), disease progression (REL), and time without disease progression symptoms or grade ⩾3 toxicity (TWiST). Mean Q-TWiST was calculated by weighting time spent by a utility of 1.0 for TWiST and 0.5 for TOX and REL. In threshold analyses, utility for TOX and REL were varied from 0.0 to 1.0.ResultsPatients in nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (n=117) vs 5-FU/LV (n=119) had significantly more mean time in TWiST (3.4 vs 2.4 months) and TOX (1.0 vs 0.3 months) but similar REL (2.5 vs 2.7 months). In the base case, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV patients had 1.3 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.1; 5.1 vs 3.9) greater Q-TWiST (threshold analyses range: 0.9-1.6 months).ConclusionsWithin NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI+5-FU/LV resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful gains in quality-adjusted survival vs 5-FU/LV alone.

| S-EPMC5482729 | biostudies-literature

Oxaliplatin/capecitabine vs oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer: the MRC COIN trial.

Project description:COIN compared first-line continuous chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy given intermittently or with cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC).Choice between oxaliplatin/capecitabine (OxCap) and oxaliplatin/leucovorin (LV)/infusional 5-FU (OxFU) was by physician and patient choice and switching regimen was allowed. We compared OxCap with OxFU and OxCap+cetuximab with OxFU+cetuximab retrospectively in patients and examined efficacy, toxicity profiles and the effect of mild renal impairment.In total, 64% of 2397 patients received OxCap(± cetuximab). Overall survival, progression free survival and overall response rate were similar between OxCap and OxFU but rate of radical surgeries was higher for OxFU. Progression free survival was longer for OxFU+cetuximab compared with OxCap+cetuximab but other efficacy measures were similar. Oxaliplatin/LV/infusional 5-FU (± cetuximab) was associated with more mucositis and infection whereas OxCap(± cetuximab) caused more gastrointestinal toxicities and palmar-plantar erythema. In total, 118 patients switched regimen, mainly due to toxicity; only 16% came off their second regimen due to intolerance. Patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) 50-80 ml min(-1) on OxCap(± cetuximab) or OxFU+cetuximab had more dose modifications than those with better renal function.Overall, OxFU and OxCap are equally effective in treating aCRC. However, the toxicity profiles differ and switching from one regimen to the other for poor tolerance is a reasonable option. Patients with CrCl 50-80 ml min(-1) on both regimens require close toxicity monitoring.

| S-EPMC3461171 | biostudies-other

Phase II Study of S-1 plus LV (1 week on and 1 week off) as First-line Treatment for Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Project description:Interventions: investigational material(s) Generic name etc : S-1 (tegafur + gimeracil + oteracil potassium) INN of investigational material : S-1: tegafur, gimeracil, oteracil potassium Therapeutic category code : 422 Antimetabolic agents Dosage and Administration for Investigational material : S-1 40-60 mg x 2/day was administered orally for one week followed by one week rest. Generic name etc : LV (Levofolinate calcium) INN of investigational material : folic acid Therapeutic category code : 392 Antidotes Dosage and Administration for Investigational material : LV 25 mg x 2/day was administered orally for one week along with S-1 followed by one week rest. Primary outcome(s): Efficacy, Safety Study Design: Open-label, Multi-center Study

| 99793 | ecrin-mdr-crc

An exploratory study of treatment sensitivity and prognostic factors in a efficacy and safety study of mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab therapy in patients with chemotherapy-naive unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer

Project description:Intervention name : mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab INN of the intervention : Fluorouracil, calcium levofolinate, oxaliplatin, panitumumab Dosage And administration of the intervention : Group P; OXA: 85 mg/m2/day 1, l-LV: 200 mg/m2/day 1, 5-FU iv: 400 mg/m2/day 1, 5-FU civ: 2400 mg/m2/day 1-3, panitumumab: 6 mg/kg; mFOLFOX6 + panitumumab combination therapy, once every two weeks Control intervention name : mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab INN of the control intervention : Fluorouracil, calcium levofolinate, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab Dosage And administration of the control intervention : Group B; OXA: 85 mg/m2/day 1, l-LV: 200 mg/m2/day 1, 5-FU iv: 400 mg/m2/day 1, 5-FU civ: 2400 mg/m2/day 1-3, bevacizumab: 5 mg/kg; mFOLFOX6 + bevacizumab combination therapy, once every two weeks Primary outcome(s): exploratory Overall survival (OS) Timeframe: Up to approximately 63 months OS obtained in the main study will be stratified by the presence or absence of mutation of tumor-associated genes in tumor tissues at the baseline of the main study evaluate the relationship between OS and gene mutations. OS will be measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any causes. Study Design: Exploratory analysis

| 2658055 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Validation of the 12-gene colon cancer recurrence score in NSABP C-07 as a predictor of recurrence in patients with stage II and III colon cancer treated with fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) and FU/LV plus oxaliplatin.

Project description:Accurate assessments of recurrence risk and absolute treatment benefit are needed to inform colon cancer adjuvant therapy. The 12-gene Recurrence Score assay has been validated in patients with stage II colon cancer from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9581 and Quick and Simple and Reliable (QUASAR) trials. We conducted an independent, prospectively designed clinical validation study of Recurrence Score, with prespecified end points and analysis plan, in archival specimens from patients with stage II and III colon cancer randomly assigned to fluorouracil (FU) or FU plus oxaliplatin in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-07.Recurrence Score was assessed in 892 fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens (randomly selected 50% of patients with tissue). Data were analyzed by Cox regression adjusting for stage and treatment.Continuous Recurrence Score predicted recurrence (hazard ratio for a 25-unit increase in score, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.50 to 2.55; P < .001), as well as disease-free and overall survival (both P < .001). Recurrence Score predicted recurrence risk (P = .001) after adjustment for stage, mismatch repair, nodes examined, grade, and treatment. Recurrence Score did not have significant interaction with stage (P = .90) or age (P = .76). Relative benefit of oxaliplatin was similar across the range of Recurrence Score (interaction P = .48); accordingly, absolute benefit of oxaliplatin increased with higher scores, most notably in patients with stage II and IIIA/B disease.The 12-gene Recurrence Score predicts recurrence risk in stage II and stage III colon cancer and provides additional information beyond conventional clinical and pathologic factors. Incorporating Recurrence Score into the clinical context may better inform adjuvant therapy decisions in stage III as well as stage II colon cancer.

| S-EPMC3871512 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data