Dataset Information

Addition of binimetinib after refractory to encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT: Interventions: Encorafenib 300 mg once daily Binimetinib 45 mg twice daily Cetuximab 400 mg/m^2 Day 1, 250 mg/m^2 Day 8, 15, 22 (250 mg/m^2 from Cycle 2 later) These treatments are repeated every 28 days in one cycle. Primary outcome(s): Progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks after first protocol treatment Study Design: single arm study, open(masking not used), uncontrolled control, single assignment, treatment purpose

DISEASE(S): Unresectable, Advanced Or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer With Braf V600e Mutation

PROVIDER: 2614541 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEncorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib showed increased objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR in previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated (mut) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although no formal comparison was planned, addition of binimetinib to encorafenib plus cetuximab did not provide significant efficacy advantage.Patients and methodsThis real-life study was aimed at evaluating safety, activity, and efficacy of encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E-mut mCRC treated at 21 Italian centers within a nominal use program launched in May 2019.ResultsOut of 133 patients included, 97 (73%) received encorafenib plus cetuximab (targeted doublet) and 36 (27%) the same therapy plus binimetinib (targeted triplet). Most patients had Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 (86%), right-sided primary tumor (69%), and synchronous disease (66%). Twenty (15%) tumors were DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI)-high. As many as 44 (34%) patients had received two or more prior lines of therapy, 122 (92%) were previously exposed to oxaliplatin, and 109 (82%) to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). Most frequent adverse events were asthenia (62%) and anti-EGFR-related skin rash (52%). Any grade nausea (P = 0.03), vomiting (P = 0.04), and diarrhea (P = 0.07) were more frequent with the triplet therapy, while melanocytic nevi were less common (P = 0.06). Overall, ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 23% and 69%, respectively, with numerically higher rates in the triplet group (ORR 31% versus 17%, P = 0.12; DCR 78% versus 65%, P = 0.23). Median PFS and OS were 4.5 and 7.2 months, respectively. Worse ECOG-PS, peritoneal metastases, and more than one prior treatment were independent poor prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Clonality of BRAF mutation measured as adjusted mutant allele fraction in tumor tissue was not associated with clinical outcome.ConclusionsOur real-life data are consistent with those from the BEACON trial in terms of safety, activity, and efficacy. Patients in good general condition and not heavily pretreated are those more likely to derive benefit from the targeted treatment.

Dataset Information

Addition of binimetinib after refractory to encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets