Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A Randomized Controlled Trial compares the efficacy of Moviprep vs Muben on the bowel preparation of the patients who undergo colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

ABSTRACT: Interventions: Moviprep 1.5L ~ 2L Muben 3L ~ 4L Primary outcome(s): Preparation time Study Design: Parallel Randomized

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Tumor

PROVIDER: 2630005 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Countertraction in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5989134 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of Moviprep and Prepkit C Bowel preparation in inflammatory bowel disease patients and in the general population

Project description:Interventions: Randomised to two different types of bowel prep: Moviprep or Prep Kit C All patients were provided with the bowel preparation kits and written information explaining appropriate diet changes, instructions on how to prepare and timing of consumption. This information was additionally explained at a face-to-face review in the outpatient clinic up to four weeks before the colonoscopy by either a senior gastroenterologist or a gastroenterology advanced trainee. Arm 1: Moviprep Moviprep comes with two large sachets (sachet A) and two small sachets (sachet B). Each pair of sachets (A and B) is dissolved in one litre of water to make a solution. One litre is taken the evening before the procedure and the other in the early morning on the day of of the colonoscopy. Primary outcome(s): Bowel preparation tolerability as determined by a Tolerability Questionnaire [On day of completion of bowel preparation ] Study Design: Purpose: Diagnosis; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Parallel;Type of endpoint: Safety/efficacy

| 2469860 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Successful esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection with intraoperative release of stenosis due to previous endoscopic submucosal dissection scarring.

Project description:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard endoscopic treatment for early esophageal cancer. Esophageal stricture often occurs at the site of ESD for large lesions. When treating a metachronous lesion appearing at the severe stricture, it may be difficult to negotiate a conventional endoscope through the stricture. Using a thin endoscope may be a useful strategy for such lesions, though ESD using a thin endoscope is challenging because of poor maneuverability. Herein, we report a case of successful ESD for early esophageal cancer at the severe stricture, using a conventional endoscope. A 72-year-old man with a previous history of ESD for esophageal cancer and a post-ESD esophageal stricture was referred to our hospital for metachronous early esophageal cancer. The lesion, 10 mm in diameter, was located at the stricture with a slight distal extension. Conventional endoscopes could not be negotiated through stricture. Therefore, submucosal dissection was performed from the oral to the anal aspect of the lesion, as far as possible. After completion of submucosal dissection of the oral aspect of the lesion and part of the lesion located on the stricture, the severe stricture was released, allowing the passage of conventional endoscope, and ESD of the entire lesion was completed en bloc. Histopathological examination showed squamous cell carcinoma, pT1a-LPM. Stricture due to scarring may occur during the regeneration process of the defective mucosa, muscularis mucosa, and submucosal layer. Therefore, incision and dissection of the contracted mucosa, mucularis mucosa, and submucosal layer would release the stenosis.

| S-EPMC8828227 | biostudies-literature

Successful removal of duodenal submucosal tumors with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6119220 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection: use of a novel bipolar radiofrequency and microwave-powered device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7426889 | biostudies-literature

Quality in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:Progress in the endoscopy technology field led to an increase in the diagnosis of early gastrointestinal (GI) superficial lesions and to an improvement of their treatment. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed in Japan with the aim of removing such lesions in one piece, in order to obtain a curative resection and to minimize the risk of local recurrence, and to preserve the native organ. ESD is widely used in Asia for the treatment of early upper and lower GI lesions and is currently gaining attention in Western countries too. However, ESD can be safely performed only by expert endoscopists and in specific clinical settings. Therefore, prior to decide whether ESD is feasible or not, the target lesion must be carefully assessed, in order to understand whether or not it is eligible for submucosal dissection. The aim of this paper is to review indications, limitations and technical aspects of upper GI ESD.

| S-EPMC6064797 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal metastatic melanoma.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6834970 | biostudies-literature

Bridge formation method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10099846 | biostudies-literature

Modeling Haptic Interactions in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD).

Project description:The ability to provide realistic haptic feedback is indispensable for virtual-reality (VR) based endoscopic colorectal surgery simulators. Despite its importance, force feedback is commonly simulated by simplified approximations with parameters manually tuned in preliminary evaluations due to the complexity of the dynamics of haptic interaction in colonoscopy interventions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a particularly challenging intervention that requires advanced manual skills for endoscopic control. This work proposes a mechanical impedance model for haptic interactions in ESD formulated via an experimental methodology applied to endoscopic colorectal interventions in general. The developed model is shown to capture the variations in the interaction force during two operations performed at distinct locations on a porcine sample. Salient cues in the recorded haptic interaction data are presented, and changes in the impedance characteristics of the tool-tissue interaction between the steps of the operation are analyzed.

| S-EPMC9652775 | biostudies-literature

Multiband mucosectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal excavation for GI submucosal tumors: short and long term follow-up.

Project description:AIMS:To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of 3 different endoscopic dissection techniques for upper gastrointestinal (GI) submucosal tumours (SMTs). METHODS:Data for 135 patients withGI SMTs who underwent multiband mucosectomy (MBM), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) were retrospectively assessed. The en bloc resection rate, endoscopic complete resection rate, operation time, potential complications and local recurrence rate were compared. RESULTS:No significant differences were observed in the rate of endoscopic complete resections and pathologic complete resections among the three groups. For SMTs >?15?mm in width, the lowest en bloc resection rate was found for MBM (P?=?0.000). MBM was also associated with the shortest procedure time, lowest perforation rate and lowest rate of major bleeding. ESE was the most effective procedure for muscularis propria (MP) lesions but was associated with the longest operation time (P?<?0.01). The ESD and ESE groups had similar perforation rates (P?>?0.05). No differences were observed in 4-year local recurrence rates among the groups (P?=?0.945). CONCLUSIONS:MBM is a simple and effective method for the treatment of small SMTs and achieves clinical success rates similar to those of ESD and ESE. However, ESD and ESE are preferable for larger and deep lesions and are associated with a longer operation time. Nonetheless, all 3 techniques resulted in a low 4-year local recurrence rate. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further investigate these results.

| S-EPMC6731551 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data