Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Clinical study of underwater cold snare polypectomy for the treatment of colorectal adenoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT: Interventions: experimenta group:Underwater cold snare polypectomy;control group:Cold trap polyp resection Primary outcome(s): Biopsy results of the bottom and edge of the specimen Study Design: Parallel

DISEASE(S): Colorectal Adenoma

PROVIDER: 2705021 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy

Project description:The aim of this study is to compare cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for the removal and retrieval of small colorectal polyps. Cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps up to 8 mm is expected to be more effective than conventional polypectomy.

| 2061869 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of usefulness of prophylactically hemostatic clipping for artificial ulcers after cold snare polypectomy for colonic polyps

Project description:Interventions: Cold snare polypectomy Hemostatic clipping after cold snare polypectomy Primary outcome(s): Bleeding rate after cold snare polypectomy. Study Design: Parallel Randomized

| 2633840 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Sessile Serrated Polyps

Project description:Comparing the efficacy of cold snare polypectomy with endoscopic mucosal resection

| 2230090 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cold Snare Polypectomy for Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Project description:The purpose of this study is to collect prospective observational data regarding patients with diagnosed Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) undergoing cold snare polypectomy for duodenal adenomas

| 2268802 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Evaluation of Cold Forcep and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Polyps Less Than or Equal to 3mm in Size During Colonoscopy

Project description:The focus of the study is to evaluate impact of cold forcep and cold snare in achieving complete resection during polypectomy of polyps <=3mm during colonoscopy.

| 2351722 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Comparing the efficiency of 2 cold snare polypectomy techniques during colonoscopy

Project description:Interventional Procedure (Arm 1): Snare-WithIn-The-scope-CHannel (SWITCH) Cold Snare Polypectomy In this arm, all polyps encountered during colonoscopy will be removed by SWITCH cold polypectomy technique. This involved advancement of the snare which is already in the scope channel, transecting the polyp (i.e. polypectomy), then partially withdrawing the snare into the channel (without removing the snare from the scope channel) prior to suctioning the polyp for retrieval. All further polyps encountered in the same patient will be removed by the same technique. All procedures will be performed by 2 consultant gastroenterologists with expertise in therapeutic colonoscopy. The procedure duration is similar to any standard colonoscopy and is allocated half an hour slot in the weekday elective endoscopy list. Duration can vary depending on number of polyps encountered. Primary outcome(s): - Mean total polypectomy time per patient The total polypectomy time is defined as the total time from a polyp has been detected detected by the endoscopist until the polyp has been transected, then has been suctioned and has reached the trap (i.e. from polyp detection until polyp reaching the trap) , as measured by the research assistant with a stop watch. [Assessed from polyp detection until polyp retrieval into the trap. ] Study Design: Purpose: Treatment; Allocation: Randomised controlled trial; Masking: Blinded (masking used);Assignment: Parallel;Type of endpoint: Efficacy

| 2463888 | ecrin-mdr-crc

How to manage the colorectal high-grade dysplasia or cancer resected by cold snare polypectomy: Multicenter exploratory study

Project description:Primary outcome(s): The local recurrence rate after cold snare polypectomy for colorectal cancers or dysplasias

| 2659935 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Cold Snare Polypectomy

Project description:During colonoscopy, the endoscopist will document prospectively all polyps detected and note the size, location and morphology. Polyps of 4-20 mm will be removed only in accordance with the method the cold snare. Afterwards, the remaining tissues could be observed with an imaging technology called Optivista with an injection of 10-50 ml of saline solution (if required) to improve visibility of the tissues. The endoscopist will continue to remove the remaining polyp tissue (with a snare or forceps) until there are no more visible polyp tissues. Biopsies from the polyp resection site will be sent to the laboratory for analysis to confirm the complete resection.

| 2271138 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

Project description:Background and study aims Small colorectal polyps are removed by various methods, including cold snare polypectomy (CSP), hot snare polypectomy (HSP), and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR), but the indications for using these methods are unclear. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy of CSP, HSP, and UEMR for small polyps, focusing on the depth of the resected specimens. Patients and methods Outpatients with non-pedunculated small polyps (endoscopically diagnosed as 6 to 9 mm), resected by two endoscopists between July 2019 and September 2020, were enrolled. We histologically evaluated the specimens resected via CSP, HSP, and UEMR. The main outcome was the containment rate of the muscularis mucosa (MM) and submucosa (SM) tissues. Results Forty polyps resected via CSP (n = 14), HSP (n = 12), or UEMR (n = 14) were enrolled after excluding 13 polyps with resection depths that were difficult to determine. The rates of specimens containing MM and SM tissue differed significantly (57 % and 29 % for CSP, 92 % and 83 % for HSP, and 100 % and 100 % for UEMR, respectively ( P = 0.005 for MM and P < 0.001 for SM tissue). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed UEMR was an independent factor relating to the containment of SM tissue. The thickness of SM tissue by CSP, HSP, and UEMR were 52 μm, 623 μm, and 1119 μm, respectively ( P < 0.001). The thickness by CSP was significantly less than those by HSP and UEMR ( P < 0.001, Bonferroni correction). Conclusions UEMR could be the best method to contain SM tissue without injection. Further studies are needed to evaluate the indication of UEMR for small polyps.

| S-EPMC9106413 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.

Project description:Patients who met the criteria for removal of 10-19mm colorectal polyps using cold snare or hot snare were included in the study, signed by endoscopic treatment written informed consent for surgery, patients with detailed tracking and record the basic information and information related to the operation, postoperative lack of region and edge endoscopic observation carefully no residue, additional excision may be took if necessary，after resection specimen inspection, and in 6 months review colonoscopy, assess whether there is residual or recurrence of polyps.Main outcome: technical success rate (no other auxiliary resection), complete resection rate, secondary outcome: intraoperative and postoperative complications, polypectomy time and related costs, influential factors of incomplete resection.Research significance: The effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of cold and hot snare resection of 10-19mm colorectal polyps were compared, and the influencing factors of incomplete polyps resection were analyzed, so as to provide evidence for the decision on the best method of medium-size polyps resection.

| 2344080 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data