Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Fruquintinib vs. Fruquintinib in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis Failure of Standard Second-line Chemotherapy: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Colon Cancer
PROVIDER: 2759486 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:Fruquintinib (HMPL-013) is a novel oral small molecule that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3 and has demonstrated potent inhibitory effects on multiple human tumor xenografts. Combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), this study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases as the third-line therapy.
| 2733287 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a highly aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis and few effective therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and predictive biomarkers of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX-HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for patients with advanced iCCA. Locally advanced or metastatic iCCA patients receiving the triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and FOLFOX-HAIC were included in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was the progression-free survival, evaluated using the RECIST criterion. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. Whole exome and RNA sequencing of tumor biopsy tissues were performed for biomarker exploration. Between May, 2019 and December 2022, a total of 46 patients were included in this study. The primary endpoint showed a median progression-free survival of 9.40 months (95% CI: 5.28-13.52), with a 6-month progression-free survival rate of 76.1%. The median overall survival was 16.77 months (95% CI, 14.20-19.33), with an objective response rate of 47.8% and disease control rate of 91.3% per RECIST. In addition, 4.3% and 8.7% of patients achieved complete response of all lesions and intrahepatic target lesions per mRECIST, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase level. Furthermore, integrated analysis of genetic, transcriptomic, and immunohistochemistry data revealed that pre-existing immunity (high expression level of immune-related signatures and intra-tumoral CD8+ T cell density) in baseline tumour tissues was associated with superior clinical benefits. However, the evaluation of tumor mutation burden did not show potential predictive value in this triple combination. FOLFOX-HAIC in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor demonstrated a promising antitumor activity with manageable safety profiles in patients with advanced iCCA. Moreover, our study also revealed new perspectives on potential biomarkers for clinical efficacy.
2024-02-06 | GSE255058 | GEO
Project description:BACKGROUND:Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is frequently used to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian countries. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting the use of HAIC. SUMMARY:Many studies report high response rates in patients with advanced HCC receiving HAIC, and clinical responses translate to survival benefits. Therefore, prediction of an antitumor response is important in selecting appropriate treatments. There are no proven post-sorafenib therapeutic measures or procedures for HCC patients with poor liver function, and HAIC is one of the few options for patients in these situations. Despite studies showing its effectiveness, the use of HAIC for treatment of advanced HCC is unclear because convincing data from large-scale randomized clinical trials are lacking. For HAIC to become a standard treatment for HCC, such trials must establish its efficacy compared with other HCC therapies; prediction of antitumor response in HAIC may aid trial design, and a multi-center, open-labelled, randomized clinical trial of HAIC in advanced HCC is currently in progress. Optimization of HCC treatment protocols and regimens is also required. KEY MESSAGE:We think that both HAIC and sorafenib are effective treatments for advanced HCC, and this review presents evidence supporting this contention.
| S-EPMC4608627 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To assess the feasibility and results of liver resection after preoperative hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy with FUDR.
| 2043683 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:AimsTo compare the effectiveness, safety, and survival outcomes in patients with infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).MethodsA total of 160 patients with infiltrative HCCs who underwent initial TACE (n = 68) and HAIC (n = 92) treatment from January 2016 to March 2020. We applied the propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for potential imbalances. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were compared between two groups. Multivariate analysis was evaluated through the forward stepwise Cox regression model and β coefficients was applied for the nomogram construction.ResultsThe median follow-up duration for the study population was 20.8 months. After PSM, the median OS and PFS in the HAIC group were significantly higher than those in the TACE group (OS, 13.3 vs 10.8 months; p = 0.043; PFS, 7.8 vs 4.0 months; p = 0.035) and the ORR and DCR in the HAIC group were significantly higher than those in the TACE group (ORR, 34.8% vs 11.8%; p = 0.001; DCR, 54.3% vs 36.8%; p = 0.028). A nomogram model comprising albumin-bilirubin grade, treatment responses, sessions, and treatment modalities, showed good predictive accuracy and discrimination (training set, concordance index [C-index] of 0.789; validation set, C-index of 0.757), which outperformed other staging systems and conventional indices.ConclusionHAIC improve significantly survival compared to TACE in patients with infiltrative HCC. A prospective randomized trial is ongoing to confirm this finding.
| S-EPMC8716800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Interventions: Monotherapy group:6 cycles of systemic chemotherapy;Combined Therapy group:2 cycles of HAIC plus 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy
Primary outcome(s): disease-free survival
Study Design: Randomized parallel controlled trial
| 2674936 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primitive liver cancer. Despite recent advances in the surgical management, the prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) has a median survival between 18 and 30 months, but if deemed unresectable it decreases to 6 months. Most patients have a liver-confined disease that is considered unresectable because of its localization, with infiltration of vascular structures or multifocality. The peculiar dual blood supply allows the delivery of high doses of chemotherapy via a surgically implanted subcutaneous pump, through the predominant arterial tumor vascularization, achieving much higher and more selective tumor drug levels than systemic administration. The results of the latest studies suggest that adequate and early treatment with the combination approach of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) and systemic (SYS) chemotherapy is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival than SYS or HAI alone for the treatment of unresectable iCCA. Current recommendations are limited by a lack of prospective trials. Individualization of chemotherapy and regimens based on selective targets in mutant iCCA are a focus for future research. In this paper we present a comprehensive review of the studies published to date and ongoing trials.
| S-EPMC8228250 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite the availability of molecularly targeted agents for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), these are limited to compensated cirrhotic patients, and concerns about decreased hepatic functional reserve (HFR) and unknown adverse events, which may affect long-term survival, remain unaddressed. In this study, we enrolled 96 aHCC patients treated with bimonthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (B-HAIC) with cisplatin or sorafenib monotherapy (oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily) not only to demonstrate its efficacy and significance but also to indicate preferable candidates by setting a response-related biomarker. Differences in treatment had no significant effect on overall survival (OS). The response rate in patients treated with B-HAIC was relatively higher than those treated with sorafenib. HFR was well maintained over the treatment course with B-HAIC, while it was significantly impaired with sorafenib. By employing multivariate analysis, we found negative trends between progression-free survival (PFS) periods and serum levels of alpha fetoprotein as well as des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP). In addition, a logistic regression analysis of the relationship between serum DCP levels and PFS periods over 420 days (14 months) showed that the PFS periods of patients with higher DCP was significantly shorter than those of patients with lower DCP (p = 0.02). Subsequently, the present study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of B-HAIC and identified a predictor of unpreferable patients. Based on these results, B-HAIC might be an alternative treatment after the implementation of new molecularly targeted therapies.
| S-EPMC7914951 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrior to the approval of sorafenib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was offered to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in East Asia, particularly Japan. According to the Japanese guidelines, HAIC is recommended as one of the treatment options in patients without extrahepatic metastasis (EHM).MethodsThe present cohort study compared the use of HAIC and sorafenib on outcomes of patients with advanced HCC. Consecutive patients with advanced HCC who received HAIC or sorafenib as a first-line systemic therapy were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) in patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI), but without EHM, and OS in patients without both MVI and EHM.ResultsBetween 2009 and 2016, 2,006 patients were enrolled (541 HAIC patients, 1,465 sorafenib patients). After propensity score matching, the OS of patients with MVI but without EHM was significantly longer in the HAIC group compared with the sorafenib group (10.1 vs. 9.1 months for the HAIC and sorafenib groups, respectively; n = 170 for each group; hazard ratio [HR] 0.668; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.475-0.935; p = 0.018). There was no significant difference in OS between patients without both MVI and EHM (12.2 vs. 15.4 months for the HAIC and sorafenib groups, respectively; n = 76 in each cohort after propensity score matching; HR 1.227; 95% CI 0.699-2.155; p = 0.475).ConclusionHAIC is a potential front-line treatment choice in a subpopulation of patients with advanced HCC with MVI but without EHM.
| S-EPMC7548914 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC). Though HAI with oxaliplatin (HAI-Ox) is generally used, intravenous (IV) 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU)-oxaliplatin-irinotecan HAI (HAI-Folfirinox) is feasible and leads to curative-intent surgery in 30% of pretreated patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of HAI-Ox and HAI-Folfirinox.MethodsPatients who underwent HAI chemotherapy for LMCRC were retrospectively included from 2008 to 2019 from six French expert centers.ResultsData were collected from 273 previously treated patients with LMCRC. Patients received HAI-Folfirinox (n = 52) or HAI-Ox (n = 221) combined with IV chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 43.2% in patients with HAI-Folfirinox and 45.9% (ns) in patients with HAI-Ox. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months (95% CI: 15-32.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 26.2 months (95% CI: 19.4-34.4; p = 0.1) with HAI-Ox. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.9-10.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 6.4 months (95% CI: 6.0-7.7; p = 0.6) with HAI-Ox. The secondary liver resection rate was 35.6% with HAI-Folfirinox and 16.7% with HAI-Ox (p = 0.007). Grade 2 and above toxicities were significantly more frequent with HAI-Folfirinox. In the global population, only 2 factors were prognostic for OS in multivariable analyses: liver-only disease [hazard ratio (HR): 0.4; 95% CI 0.20-0.83; p = 0.013] and local complications of the catheter (HR: 3.8; 95% CI 1.6-9.0; p = 0.002).ConclusionHepatic arterial infusion results in high response rates, secondary resections, and long survival in pretreated patients with LMCRC.
| S-EPMC9243466 | biostudies-literature