Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Alternating Treatment With Fruquintinib and Bevacizumab Plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ABSTRACT: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized parallel-group phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Approximately 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have achieved partial remission after completing 8 cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy (FOLFOX combined with Bevacizumab) but are still in un-resectable state will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm A) or Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and efficacy of Fruquintinib alternating with Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine will be assessed in approximately 20 patients. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, death, or other criteria for ending the study (whichever occurs earlier). The study will evaluate PFS, ORR, DCR, OS and safety.

DISEASE(S): Metastatic Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms

PROVIDER: 3051 | ecrin-mdr-crc |

REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Fruquintinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Bevacizumab Plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy Following First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as maintenance therapy following first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients who have already achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD), without discontinuation for toxicity, and are progression free after 4-6 months of standard first-line induction treatment will be assigned to 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive fruquintinib + capecitabine (Arm A) or bevacizumab + capecitabine (Arm B). The study contains a safety lead-in phase in which the safety and tolerability of fruquintinib + capecitabine will be assessed prior to the phase 2 portion of the study. All patients from Arm A and Arm B will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal (whichever occurs earlier).

| 2365787 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Genomic landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer

Project description:Response to drug therapy in individual colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is associated with tumor biology. Here we describe the genomic landscape of tumor samples of a homogeneous well-annotated series of patients with metastatic CRC of two phase III clinical trials, CAIRO and CAIRO2. DNA copy number aberrations of 349 patients are determined. Within three treatment arms, 194 chromosomal sub-regions are associated with progression free survival PFS (uncorrected single-test p-values < 0.005). These sub-regions are filtered for effect on mRNA expression, using an independent data set from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) which returned 171 genes. Three chromosomal regions are associated with a significant difference in PFS between treatment arms with or without irinotecan. One of these regions, 6q16.1-q21, correlates in vitro with sensitivity to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. This genomic landscape of metastatic CRC reveals a number of DNA copy number aberrations associated with response to drug therapy. aCGH data of colorectal cancers of patients from 2 clinical trials (CAIRO, CAIRO2). 105 patients were treated with capecitabine first line (CAIRO arm A), 111 patients were treated with capecitabine and irinotecan first line (CAIRO arm B), and 133 patients were treated with capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (CAIRO2 arm A).

2014-11-14 | E-GEOD-36864 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Assessment of tumor pathological and transcriptional biomarkers in pre- and on-treatment core biopsies predictive of response and outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer

Project description:Assessment of tumor pathological and transcriptional biomarkers in pre- and on-treatment core biopsies predictive of response and outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from a multi-center, single-arm, phase 2 study (the PROMIX trial) Global gene expression profiling was performed on samples from 3 time points (baseline, after 2 cycles and surgery) from women with breast cancer receivcing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab in a phase 2 trial

2017-09-01 | GSE87455 | GEO

Gene expression profile of FFPE samples collected with translational purposes from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV2 clinical trial

Project description:MITO16/MaNGO-OV2 (NCT01706120) is a multicenter, phase IV, single arm trial for advanced stage IIIB-IV or recurrent, previously untreated, ovarian cancer patients receiving carboplatin, paclitaxel plus bevacizumab for six 3-weekly cycles followed by bevacizumab single agent until progression or unacceptable toxicity up to a maximum of 22 total cycles. The trial that was specifically designed with a translational primary endpoint to explore if selected clinical and biological factors could identify ovarian cancer patients with better prognosis in terms of progression free survival and overall survival after combined first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab. The translational study, designed together with the clinical trial, the translational study implicated the collection of patients’ tissue (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded – FFPE) and blood samples. Gene expression profile was among the molecular analyses proposed on FFPE samples.

2023-04-19 | GSE208103 | GEO

A phase Ib trial evaluating the safety, efficacy, and immunologic effects of pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel or flat-dose capecitabine in 1st/2nd line metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Project description:Chemoimmunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death 1/ligand 1 and cytotoxic chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic modality for women with triple-negative breast cancer, but questions remain regarding optimal chemotherapy backbone and biomarkers for patient selection. We report final outcomes from a phase Ib trial evaluating pembrolizumab (200mg IV every 3 weeks) with either weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2 weekly) or flat-dose capecitabine (2000mg orally twice daily for 7 days of every 14-day cycle) in the 1st/2nd line setting. The primary endpoint is safety (receipt of 2 cycles without grade III/IV toxicities requiring discontinuation or ≥21-day delays). The secondary endpoint is efficacy (week 12 objective response). Exploratory aims are to characterize immunologic effects of treatment over time, and to evaluate novel biomarkers. The trial demonstrates that both regimens meet the pre-specified safety endpoint (paclitaxel: 87%; capecitabine: 100%). Objective response rate is 29% for pembrolizumab/paclitaxel (n=4/13, 95% CI: 10-61%) and 43% for pembrolizumab/capecitabine (n=6/14, 95% CI: 18-71%). Partial responses are observed in two subjects with chemo-refractory metaplastic carcinoma (both in capecitabine arm). Both regimens are associated with significant peripheral leukocyte contraction over time. Response is associated with clinical PD-L1 score, non-receipt of prior chemotherapy, and the H&E stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocyte score, but also by a novel 27 gene IO score and spatial biomarkers (lymphocyte spatial skewness). In conclusion, pembrolizumab with paclitaxel or capecitabine is safe and clinically active. Both regimens are lymphodepleting, highlighting the competing immunostimulatory versus lymphotoxic effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further exploration of the IO score and spatial TIL biomarkers is warranted.

2023-02-17 | GSE225078 | GEO

The Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib Plus Chemotherapy as Second-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Project description:This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib combined with chemotherapy vs bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will receive fruquintinib+ FOLFIRI or bevacizumab+FOLFIRI as the second-line treatment. After receiving 4-6 months of second-line treatment, patients who achieve disease control will receive fruquintinib + capecitabine or bevacizumab+ capecitabine as maintenance treatment. All patients will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal.

| 2749552 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Fruquintinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After First-line Chemotherapy

Project description:This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line treatment. Patients who have already achieved disease control (including CR/PR and SD) after ≥6 cycles of standard first-line induction treatment, and are still unresectable would be assigned into 2 maintenance treatment groups by randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive fruquintinib + capecitabine or capecitabine. All patients will be treated until progressive disease, death from any cause, unacceptable toxicity or informed consent withdrawal.

| 2740471 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Recurrent breakpoint genes in colorectal cancer

Project description:In this study our aim was to document recurrent DNA copy number aberration associated breakpoints in primary tumors of colorectal cancer patients that ultimately received systemic treatment in the context of metastatic disease. Such data can be used to catalogue copy number aberration associated breakpoints and thereby affected genes. To this end, high quality arrayCGH data set of clinically well annotated colorectal cancer specimens was generated using FFPE tumor samples from patients from two phase III clinical trials, namely CAIRO and CAIRO2. arrayCGH data of colorectal cancers of patients from 2 clinical trials. 108 patients were treated with capecitabine first line, 110 patients were treated with capecitabine and irinotecan first line and 134 patients were treated with capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab.

2014-11-14 | E-GEOD-63216 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Safety and efficacy of Alternating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab every 4cycles as First line Therapy in Advanced colorectal Cancer

Project description:Interventions: Alternating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab every 4cycles. Primary outcome(s): PFS Study Design: Single arm Non-randomized

| 2616805 | ecrin-mdr-crc

Patients With Proneural Glioblastoma May Derive Overall Survival Benefit From the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: Retrospective Analysis of the AVAglio Trial

Project description:The AVAglio and RTOG-0825 randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma reported prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), with the addition of bevacizumab to radiotherapy/temozolomide. To establish whether certain patient subgroups derived OS benefit from the addition of bevacizumab to first-line standard-of-care therapy, AVAglio patients were retrospectively evaluated for molecular subtype, and bevacizumab efficacy assessed for each patient subgroup. A multivariate analysis accounting for prognostic covariates revealed that bevacizumab conferred a significant OS advantage versus placebo for patients with Proneural IDH1 wild-type tumors (17.1 v 12.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.73; P = .002). This analysis also revealed an interaction between the Proneural subtype biomarker and treatment arm (P = .023). The group of patients with Mesenchymal and Proneural tumors derived a PFS benefit from bevacizumab, compared with placebo; however, this translated to an OS benefit in the Proneural subset only. Retrospective analysis of AVAglio data suggests that patients with IDH1 wild-type Proneural glioblastoma may derive OS benefit from first-line bevacizumab treatment. The predictive value of the Proneural subtype observed in AVAglio should be validated in an independent dataset. A total of 349 (bevacizumab arm, n = 171; placebo arm, n = 178) pretreatment specimens from AVAglio patients (total n = 921) were available for biomarker analysis. Samples were profiled for gene expression and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation status and classified into previously identified molecular subtypes. PFS and OS were assessed within each subtype.

2016-07-06 | E-GEOD-84010 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data