Liposomal Irinotecan With TAS102 and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
DISEASE(S): Metastatic Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Neoplasms
PROVIDER: 59744 | ecrin-mdr-crc |
REPOSITORIES: ECRIN MDR
Similar Datasets
Project description:BALB/c mice were vaccinated with inactivated influenza A virus adjuvanted with liposomal TLR4 (2B182C) and TLR7 agonists (2B182C) on days 0 and 21. To examine whether the liposomal combined adjuvant increase BCR diversity, lymphocytes in the draining lymph nodes harvested on day 28 were analyzed using next-generation RNA sequencing technology.
2021-03-01 | E-MTAB-8870 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A2780 ovarian cancer cells and a cisplatin resistant derivate of A2780 cells, obtained from ECACC, UK, No. 93112519 [A2780] and No. 93112517 [A2780 cis] were seeded out in T-75 flasks at a density of 2x106 for A2780sens and 3x106 for A2780cis cells in 15 ml of medium and preincubated overnight. Medium was removed and 15 ml fresh medium (37M-0C) with different concentrations of cisplatin, liposomal cisplatin or empty liposomes were added and incubated for 72 h at 37M-0C in a 5% CO2 incubator. In case of A2780sens cells, 1.72 M-5M cisplatin (IC50 concentration) and in case of A2780cis cells 8.94 M-5M cisplatin (IC50 concentration) were added. Liposomal formulations contained equal cisplatin concentrations. Empty liposomes were added in the same concentration as the liposomal cisplatin, to analyze the impact of liposomal lipids (A2780sens: 0.80M-5mol lipid, A2780cis: 4.15 M-5mol lipid). After incubation, medium was removed and cells were washed thrice with 10 ml PBS. 1 ml RLT-buffer was added and cells lysates were stored at -80M-0C until RNA extraction.
2010-12-13 | E-MEXP-2840 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Osteoarthritis (OA) affects nearly 10% of the population of the United States and other industrialized countries and, at present, short of surgical joint replacement, there is no therapy available that can reverse the progression of the disease OA. Adenosine, acting at its A2A receptor (A2AR), is a critical autocrine factor for maintenance of cartilage homeostasis. Here we report that injection of liposomal suspensions of a selective A2AR agonist, CGS21680, significantly reduced OA cartilage damage in a rat model of established post-traumatic OA (PTOA). Differential expression analysis of mRNA from chondrocytes harvested from knees of rats with PTOA treated with liposomal A2AR agonist revealed downregulation of genes associated with matrix degradation and upregulation of genes associated with cell proliferation as compared to liposomes alone.
2020-09-01 | GSE146813 | GEO
Project description:IntroductionLiposomal irinotecan promotes controlled sustained release of irinotecan (CPT-11), therefore, we hypothesize that the therapeutic index (quantitative measurement of the relative efficacy/safety ratio of a drug) will be higher for liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan.MethodsWe compared the therapeutic indexes of liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing subcutaneous patient-derived xenograft (PDX) pancreatic tumors under dosing regimens approximating the clinical setting. Following preliminary drug sensitivity/antitumor activity analyses on three PDX tumor models, one model was selected for analyses of efficacy, biomarker, toxicology, pharmacokinetics in mice receiving liposomal irinotecan (2.5, 10, 50 mg/kg/week) or non-liposomal irinotecan (10, 25, 50 mg/kg/week). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each treatment was 50 mg/kg/week.ResultsUsing the selected IM-PAN-001 model at the MTD (both treatments, 50 mg/kg/week), antitumor activity, phospho-histone gamma-H2AX protein staining in cancer cell nuclei, histological tumor regression, and plasma levels of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 after 24 h were greater with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan, but tumor SN-38 levels were similar. At the lowest doses assessed, antitumor activity, histological tumor regression, and jejunum and bone marrow toxicity were similar. Based on these findings, liposomal and non-liposomal irinotecan had therapeutic indexes of 20 and 5, respectively.ConclusionThis non-clinical study showed a fourfold broader therapeutic index with liposomal than non-liposomal irinotecan in mice bearing IM-PAN-001 PDX pancreatic tumors, even at optimal dosing for the two drugs. These findings support the clinical benefit observed with liposomal irinotecan in patients with pancreatic cancer.
| S-EPMC9935793 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of liposomal irinotecan and rucaparib when given together with fluorouracil and leucovorin calcium and to see how well they work in treating patients with pancreatic, colorectal, gastroesophageal, or biliary cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Chemotherapy drugs, such as liposomal irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin calcium, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. PARPs are proteins that help repair DNA mutations. PARP inhibitors, such as rucaparib, can keep PARP from working, so tumor cells can’t repair themselves, and they may stop growing. Giving liposomal irinotecan and rucaparib together with fluorouracil and leucovorin calcium may work better in treating patients with pancreatic, colorectal, gastroesophageal, or biliary cancer.
| 2258499 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI; Onivyde®; also known as pegylated liposomal irinotecan) has been developed with the aim of maximising anti-tumour efficacy while minimising drug-related toxicities compared with the conventional (non-liposomal) formulation of this topoisomerase 1 inhibitor. In combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV), nal-IRI is the first agent to be specifically approved for use in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) who have progressed following gemcitabine-based therapy. In the pivotal, phase III NAPOLI-1 trial, intravenous administration of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV to gemcitabine-pretreated patients with mPDAC (as a second-line treatment in approximately two-thirds of cases) was associated with a significant ≈ 2-month median overall survival advantage compared with 5-FU/LV alone. Moreover, adding nal-IRI to 5-FU/LV extended survival with a manageable safety profile and without adversely affecting health-related quality of life, thereby producing significant and clinically meaningful gains in quality-adjusted survival relative to 5-FU/LV alone. Complementing the observed efficacy and safety of nal-IRI in NAPOLI-1 are an increasing number of real-world studies, which provide evidence of the effectiveness of this combination therapy in the treatment of mPDAC that has progressed following gemcitabine-based therapy in contemporary clinical practice in Europe, the USA and East Asia. Thus, nal-IRI, in combination with 5-FU/LV, is the first regimen specifically approved for use as a second- or subsequent-line therapy in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with mPDAC and, as such, represents a valuable treatment option in this setting.
| S-EPMC7347682 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) is a liposomal formulation of irinotecan with a longer half-life (t1/2 ), higher plasma total irinotecan (tIRI), and lower SN-38 maximum concentration (Cmax ) compared with nonliposomal irinotecan. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of nal-IRI was performed for tIRI and total SN-38 (tSN38) using patient samples from six studies. PK-safety association was evaluated for neutropenia and diarrhea in 353 patients. PK-efficacy association was evaluated from a phase III study in pancreatic cancer NAPOLI1. Efficacy was associated with longer duration of unencapsulated SN-38 (uSN38) above a threshold and higher Cavg of tIRI, tSN38, and uSN38. Neutropenia was associated with uSN38 Cmax and diarrhea with tIRI Cmax . Baseline predictive factors were race, body surface area, and bilirubin. Analysis identified PK factors associated with efficacy, safety, and predictive baseline factors. The results support the benefit of nal-IRI dose of 70 mg/m2 (free-base; equivalent to 80 mg/m2 salt base) Q2W over 100 mg/m2 Q3W.
| S-EPMC5697569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Irinotecan (IRI) loaded actively into PEGylated liposomes via a sucrosulfate gradient has been approved recently to treat advanced pancreatic cancer. In this study, a similar liposomal composition was developed that includes a low mole fraction (1 mol.%) of porphyrin-phospholipid (PoP), a photosensitizer that stably incorporates into liposomes, to confer light-triggered IRI release. IRI-loaded PoP liposomes containing ammonium sucrosulfate (ASOS) as a complexing agent were more stable in serum compared to liposomes employing the more conventional ammonium sulfate. Without irradiation, PoP IRI liposomes released less than 5% IRI during 8 h of incubation in bovine serum at 37 °C, but released over 90% of the drug within minutes of exposure to red light (665 nm) irradiation. A single treatment with IRI-PoP liposomes and light exposure (15 mg/kg IRI with 250 J/cm2) resulted in tumor eradication in mice bearing either MIA PaCa-2 tumors or low-passage patient-derived tumor xenografts that recapitulate characteristics of the clinical disease. Analogous monotherapies of IRI or photodynamic therapy were ineffective in controlling tumor growth. Enhanced drug uptake could be visualized within laser-treated tumors by direct in situ imaging of irinotecan. Biodistribution analysis of IRI, its active metabolite (SN-38), and major metabolite (SN-38 G) showed that laser treatment significantly increased tumor accumulation of all IRI-derived molecular species. A pharmacokinetic model that hypothesized tumor vasculature permeabilization as the primary reason underlying the increased drug deposition accounted for the enhanced drug influx into tumors.
| S-EPMC8918863 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose: To study the potential priming benefit of bevacizumab from subsequent immunotherapy (durvalumab) in advanced breast cancer patients Methods: We tested this hypothesis by adding durvalumab after progression to maintenance single-agent bevacizumab treatment in advanced HER2-negative patients (average 3 treatment lines). In order to study the potential priming benefit, patients had to experience disease progression while on bevacizumab maintenance prior to entering the trial. In addition, we sought to find traits in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and tumor biopsies that informed about this immuno-priming, in an attempt to search for novel biomarkers of efficacy of the combo and obtain a better understanding of the biology of this clinical scenario. Results: Patients that experienced clinical benefit, compared with the remaining patients, displayed a lymphocyte pattern in PBMCs consisting on increased T-effector subpopulations (CD4- and CD8- effector and effector-memory) and decreased immunosuppressive T-regulatory cells. Gene-expression studies in tumor samples showed a congruent pattern, with increased T-effector and memory T cell signatures in responders, and increased T-regulatory and decreased active dendritic cells in non-responders. These events were observed in patients that displayed vascular normalization features as a result of previous bevacizumab, supporting the immuno-priming effects of this strategy.
2020-10-15 | GSE139050 | GEO
Project description:We evaluated the efficacy of carboplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab among bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients in a phase 2, open-label, single arm trial. Forty eligible patients received carboplatin (area under the plasma curve [AUC] 4 mg/ml-min) on day one, while bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) and irinotecan (340 mg/m(2) for patients on CYP3A-enzyme-inducing anti-epileptics [EIAEDs] and 125 mg/m(2) for patients not on EIAEDs) were administered on days 1 and 14 of every 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated after each of the first two cycles and then after every other cycle. Treatment continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, non-compliance, or voluntary withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and secondary endpoints included safety and median overall survival (OS). All patients had progression after standard therapy. The median age was 51 years. Sixteen patients (40%) had a KPS of 90-100, while 27 (68%) were at first progression. The median time from original diagnosis was 11.4 months. The PFS-6 rate was 46.5% (95% CI: 30.4, 61.0%) and the median OS was 8.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9, and 10.7 months]. Grade 4 events were primarily hematologic and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 20 and 10%, respectively. The most common grade 3 events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and infection in 25, 20, 13, and 10%, respectively. Eleven patients (28%) discontinued study therapy due to toxicity and 17 patients (43%) required dose modification. One patient died due to treatment-related intestinal perforation. The addition of carboplatin and irinotecan to bevacizumab significantly increases toxicity but does not improve anti-tumor activity to that achieved historically with single-agent bevacizumab among bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent GBM patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00953121).
| S-EPMC3616617 | biostudies-literature