EGAS00001001173-sc-20160414 - samples
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: EGAD00001002015 | EGA |
REPOSITORIES: EGA
Similar Datasets
Project description:The use of reference DNA standards generated from cancer cell lines sequenced in the Cancer Genome Project to establish the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility of the WTSI GCLP sequencing pipeline
| EGAS00001001173 | EGA
Project description:We have benchmarked the performance of cancer CNV calling by six most recent software tools on their detection accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility. We also explored the consistency of CNV calling across different orthogonal technologies, including optical mapping and microarrays. Using consensus results from six CNV callers and confirmation from three orthogonal methods, we established a high-confidence CNV call set for the reference sample.
2023-08-25 | GSE212051 | GEO
Project description:Next generation sequencing platforms have become essential tools for understanding DNA in a wide range of contexts. Their success heavily relies on the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of methods used to discern differences between the reference genome and genomes under investigation. Here we compare the relative performances of five popular single nucleotide variant callers with and without their associated recommended hard filtering criteria. We compare: FreeBayes; the Genome Analysis Toolkit’s Haplotype Caller and Unified Genotyper; SAMtools; and VarScan. We tailor this comparison to suit smaller projects with modest sample numbers (n = 10) and coverage (~10X) to fill a current gap in the literature. Other comparison studies are generally applicable only to larger projects in model species, where there is access to large amounts of sequencing data and curated callsets for base and variant quality score recalibration. We estimated the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of each pipeline according to the genotype concordance rate and number with the “truth” dataset for 10 canine samples. The truth dataset was defined as genotypes obtained from the CanineHD BeadChip array. Whole genome sequencing data was performed on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 platform as 100-101 base pair, paired end reads to an average sample coverage of 10.3X. Apart from GATK Haplotype Caller, applying recommended hard filters did not improve the performance of genotyping concordance at the tested levels of minimum coverage. The default VarScan pipeline with no additional filters applied (VarScan uses SAMtools mpileup, without base alignment quality computation) generally outperformed other callers in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The results of this study demonstrate that hard filtering of variant calls from low-powered genome studies can impair accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of callsets and provides some benchmark performance metrics on a range of low coverage levels.
2018-08-31 | GSE117010 | GEO
Project description:nCounter miRNA Expression Assay data for all profiled miRQC samples prepared by the miRQC Consortium. In this study, we systematically compared 12 commercially available miRNA expression platforms by measuring an identical set of standardized positive and negative control samples, including human universal reference RNA, human brain RNA and titrations thereof, human serum samples, and synthetic spikes from miRNA family members with varying homology. We developed novel and robust quality metrics to objectively assess platform performance of very different technologies such as small RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR and (microarray) hybridization. We assessed reproducibility, sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and concordance of differential expression.
2013-12-30 | GSE49600 | GEO
Project description:nCounter miRNA Expression Assay data for all profiled miRQC samples prepared by the miRQC Consortium. In this study, we systematically compared 12 commercially available miRNA expression platforms by measuring an identical set of standardized positive and negative control samples, including human universal reference RNA, human brain RNA and titrations thereof, human serum samples, and synthetic spikes from miRNA family members with varying homology. We developed novel and robust quality metrics to objectively assess platform performance of very different technologies such as small RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR and (microarray) hybridization. We assessed reproducibility, sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and concordance of differential expression. miRQC Consortium multi-platform comparision. *This represents the NanoString component only
2013-12-30 | E-GEOD-49600 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:<p>The Nex-StoCT and ACMG recommend that validation of an NGS-based diagnostic test include performance test characteristics for assay accuracy, analytical sensitivity and specificity, reproducibility and repeatability. To measure these parameters for the GEDi capture and sequencing test, 4 samples (three randomly selected patient samples and the NA12878 HapMap sample) were prepared and sequenced in triplicate on each of three separate days. We also performed WES and SNP array genotyping analyses of these 4 samples using Agilent V4+UTR whole exome enrichment kit and Illumina Omni 2.5 SNP arrays, respectively.</p>
| phs000798 | dbGaP
Project description:MicroRNAs from serum samples could detect pancreatic and biliary tract cancer patients more accurately than other traditional markers. Prospective miRNA markers for pancreatic/biliary tract cancer were selected in the training cohort. Using these miRNAs, discriminant analysis was performed, and the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated in the test cohort.
2015-03-01 | E-GEOD-59856 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:MiRNAs are important negative regulators of protein coding gene expression, and have been studied intensively over the last few years. Several measurement platforms, designed to determine their relative RNA abundance levels in biological samples, have been developed. In this study, we systematically compared 12 commercially available miRNA expression platforms by measuring an identical set of 20 standardized positive and negative control samples, including human universal reference RNA, human brain RNA and titrations thereof, human serum samples, and synthetic spikes from miRNA family members with varying homology. We developed novel and robust quality metrics to objectively assess platform performance of very different technologies such as small RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR and (microarray) hybridization. We assessed reproducibility, sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and concordance of differential expression. The results indicate that each method has its strengths and weaknesses, which helps to guide informed selection of a quantitative miRNA gene expression platform in function of particular study goals. Sequencing of 20 miRQC samples on Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx System
2013-08-31 | E-GEOD-49816 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq), we analyzed methylation profiles in 93 plasma samples from 77 pediatric brain tumor patients and 16 non-neoplastic patients. Binomial GLMnet classifiers of tumor and tumor subtypes were built in training sets, and performance was evaluated in test sets. The methylation profiles from plasma cfMeDIP-seq discriminated tumor from non-tumor patients with 0.83 accuracy (precision = 0.93, sensitivity = 0.86, and specificity = 0.67). Among major tumor subtypes vs. nontumors, circumscribed astrocytic glioma showed an accuracy of 0.86 (precision = 0.88, sensitivity = 0.88, and specificity = 0.83), and glioneuronal tumors had an accuracy of 0.83 (precision, sensitivity, and specificity = 0.83). Circumscribed astrocytic glioma and glioneuronal tumors could be discriminated from other tumor subtypes with 0.79 and 0.82 accuracy, respectively.
2024-09-30 | GSE275598 | GEO
Project description:MiRNAs are important negative regulators of protein coding gene expression, and have been studied intensively over the last few years. Several measurement platforms, designed to determine their relative RNA abundance levels in biological samples, have been developed. In this study, we systematically compared 12 commercially available miRNA expression platforms by measuring an identical set of 20 standardized positive and negative control samples, including human universal reference RNA, human brain RNA and titrations thereof, human serum samples, and synthetic spikes from miRNA family members with varying homology. We developed novel and robust quality metrics to objectively assess platform performance of very different technologies such as small RNA sequencing, RT-qPCR and (microarray) hybridization. We assessed reproducibility, sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and concordance of differential expression. The results indicate that each method has its strengths and weaknesses, which helps to guide informed selection of a quantitative miRNA gene expression platform in function of particular study goals.
2013-08-31 | GSE49816 | GEO