The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: EGAO00000000943 | EGA |
REPOSITORIES: EGA
Publications
B56δ-related protein phosphatase 2A dysfunction identified in patients with intellectual disability.
Houge Gunnar G Haesen Dorien D Vissers Lisenka E L M LE Mehta Sarju S Parker Michael J MJ Wright Michael M Vogt Julie J McKee Shane S Tolmie John L JL Cordeiro Nuno N Kleefstra Tjitske T Willemsen Marjolein H MH Reijnders Margot R F MR Berland Siren S Hayman Eli E Lahat Eli E Brilstra Eva H EH van Gassen Koen L I KL Zonneveld-Huijssoon Evelien E de Bie Charlotte I CI Hoischen Alexander A Eichler Evan E EE Holdhus Rita R Steen Vidar M VM Døskeland Stein Ove SO Hurles Matthew E ME FitzPatrick David R DR Janssens Veerle V
The Journal of clinical investigation 20150713 8
Here we report inherited dysregulation of protein phosphatase activity as a cause of intellectual disability (ID). De novo missense mutations in 2 subunits of serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) were identified in 16 individuals with mild to severe ID, long-lasting hypotonia, epileptic susceptibility, frontal bossing, mild hypertelorism, and downslanting palpebral fissures. PP2A comprises catalytic (C), scaffolding (A), and regulatory (B) subunits that determine subcellular ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND/AIMS:In our 2009 article, we showed that Bayesian methods had established a foothold in developing therapies in our institutional oncology trials. In this article, we will document what has happened since that time. In addition, we will describe barriers to implementing Bayesian clinical trials, as well as our experience overcoming them. METHODS:We reviewed MD Anderson Cancer Center clinical trials submitted to the institutional protocol office for scientific and ethical review between January 2009 and December 2013, the same length time period as the previous article. We tabulated Bayesian methods implemented for design or analyses for each trial and then compared these to our previous findings. RESULTS:Overall, we identified 1020 trials and found that 283 (28%) had Bayesian components so we designated them as Bayesian trials. Among MD Anderson-only and multicenter trials, 56% and 14%, respectively, were Bayesian, higher rates than our previous study. Bayesian trials were more common in phase I/II trials (34%) than in phase III/IV (6%) trials. Among Bayesian trials, the most commonly used features were for toxicity monitoring (65%), efficacy monitoring (36%), and dose finding (22%). The majority (86%) of Bayesian trials used non-informative priors. A total of 75 (27%) trials applied Bayesian methods for trial design and primary endpoint analysis. Among this latter group, the most commonly used methods were the Bayesian logistic regression model (N?=?22), the continual reassessment method (N?=?20), and adaptive randomization (N?=?16). Median institutional review board approval time from protocol submission was the same 1.4?months for Bayesian and non-Bayesian trials. Since the previous publication, the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination (BATTLE) trial was the first large-scale decision trial combining multiple treatments in a single trial. Since then, two regimens in breast cancer therapy have been identified and published from the cooperative Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging and Molecular Analysis (I-SPY 2), enhancing cooperation among investigators and drug developers across the nation, as well as advancing information needed for personalized medicine. Many software programs and Shiny applications for Bayesian trial design and calculations are available from our website which has had more than 21,000 downloads worldwide since 2004. CONCLUSION:Bayesian trials have the increased flexibility in trial design needed for personalized medicine, resulting in more cooperation among researchers working to fight against cancer. Some disadvantages of Bayesian trials remain, but new methods and software are available to improve their function and incorporation into cancer clinical research.
| S-EPMC6904523 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Organisation EGAO00000000396
| EGAO00000000396 | EGA
Project description:Organisation EGAO00000000306
| EGAO00000000306 | EGA
Project description:The purpose was to determine the incidence and prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acute leukemia patients from our institution. We conducted a retrospective study on newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients who presented at our institution from November 1999 to May 2005. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation were used to describe patient characteristics. Measures of morbidity were used to address VTE risk. Chi-square testing, Fisher's exact testing, Mann-Whitney analyses, or median testing were used to determine between-group differences. Data analyses were conducted using Stata version 11 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). Two hundred and ninety-nine patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 996 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were included. After excluding patients diagnosed with VTE prior to or at the time of leukemia diagnosis, during the mean time follow-up period of 2.5 years (range: 0.0025-10.3 years), the overall incidence rate of VTE was 3.7 per 100 person-years: 4.2 per 100 person-years for ALL and 3.4 per 100 person-years for AML. Among all patients, the majority (80.6%) developed VTE within 12 months after diagnosis and during thrombocytopenia. The most common VTE was central venous catheter (CVC)-associated upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 15% of ALL patients and 8% of AML patients. VTE recurred in 20.7% of ALL patients and 18.6% of AML patients. VTE occurs frequently in patients with acute leukemia. Studies are needed to identify risk factors for the development and recurrence of VTE among patients with acute leukemia and to establish more effective methods for preventing and treating VTEs in leukemia patients who have thrombocytopenia and/or CVC.
| S-EPMC4312115 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMen diagnosed with prostate cancer are at risk for competing morbidity and mortality due to cardiometabolic disease given their advanced age at diagnosis, high prevalence of pre-existing risk factors, and receipt of systemic therapy that targets the androgen receptor (AR). Expert panels have stressed the importance of cardiometabolic risk assessment in the clinic and proposed evaluating key risks using consensus paradigms. Yet, there is a gap in real-world evidence for implementation of comprehensive cardiometabolic care for men with prostate cancer.MethodsThis is a retrospective, descriptive study of patients with prostate cancer who were referred and evaluated in the Healthy Heart Program at MD Anderson Cancer Center, which was established to mitigate cardiometabolic risks in men with prostate cancer. Patients were seen by a cardiologist and exercise physiologist to evaluate and manage cardiometabolic risk factors, including blood pressure, cholesterol, blood glucose, tobacco use, and coronary artery disease, concurrent with management of their cancer by a medical oncologist.ResultsFrom December 2018 through October 2021, the Healthy Heart Program enrolled 55 men with prostate cancer, out of which 35 had biochemical, locoregional recurrence or distant metastases, while all received at least a single dose of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analog. Ninety-three percent of men were overweight or obese, and 51% had an intermediate or high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at 10 years based on the pooled cohort equation. Most men had an overlap of two or more cardiometabolic diseases (84%), and 25% had an overlap of at least 4 cardiometabolic diseases. Although uncontrolled hypertension and hyperlipidemia were common among the cohort (45% and 26%, respectively), only 29% of men followed up with the clinic.ConclusionsMen with prostate cancer have a high burden of concurrent cardiometabolic risk factors. At a tertiary cancer center, the Healthy Heart Program was implemented to address this need, yet the utility of the program was limited by poor follow-up possibly due to outside cardiometabolic care and inconvenient appointment logistics, a lack of cardiometabolic labs at the time of visits, and telemedicine visits.
| S-EPMC10498569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Clinical heterogeneity of gastric cancer reflected in unequal outcome of treatment is poorly defined in molecular level, and molecular subtypes and their associated biomarkers have not been established to improve prognostification and treatment of gastric cancer. Using microarray technologies, we analyzed gene expression profiling data from patients with advanced gastric cancer and uncovered potential prognostic subtypes and identify gene expression signature associated with prognosis.
2012-04-30 | GSE28541 | GEO
Project description:Clinical heterogeneity of gastric cancer reflected in unequal outcome of treatment is poorly defined in molecular level, and molecular subtypes and their associated biomarkers have not been established to improve prognostification and treatment of gastric cancer. Using microarray technologies, we analyzed gene expression profiling data from patients with advanced gastric cancer and uncovered potential prognostic subtypes and identify gene expression signature associated with prognosis. Using microarray technologies, we analyzed gene expression profiling data from patients with advanced gastric cancer and uncovered potential prognostic subtypes and identify gene expression signature associated with prognosis.
2012-04-29 | E-GEOD-28541 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BACKGROUND:To date, studies on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) lack comprehensive epidemiological data. We analyzed detailed prospectively collected clinical and epidemiological data from the IBC Registry at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS:Patients with IBC (n = 248) were consecutively diagnosed and prospectively enrolled between November 2006 and April 2013. All patients were newly diagnosed and at least 18 years old. Secondary IBC was excluded. Overall 160 variables were collected and evaluated including sociodemographics, anthropometrics, tobacco and alcohol consumption, reproductive variables, and family history data. RESULTS:Mean age at diagnosis was 51.6 (±11.5 SD) years, and the majority of patients were White (77.8%). A mean BMI ? 25 kg/m2, irrespective of menopausal status, was observed in 80.2% of all patients, with 82.6% of African Americans being obese. Approximately 42.2% of patients were ever smokers, and 91% reported ever being pregnant. A history of breastfeeding was reported in 54% of patients, with significant differences between ethnic groups in favor of White women (P<0.0001). Other reproductive factors such as use of birth control pills & hormone replacement therapy were also more frequently associated with White women compare to other ethnic groups (P < 0.05). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, African American or Hispanic ethnicity, not having breastfed, higher clinical stage, and TNBC subtype were associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSION:Our data suggest that IBC is associated with distinct epidemiological profiles. This information could assist in targeting patients with specific preventive strategies based on their modifiable behavioral patterns.
| S-EPMC6152950 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWe initiated a personalized medicine program in the context of early clinical trials, using targeted agents matched with tumor molecular aberrations. Herein, we report our observations.Patient and methodsPatients with advanced cancer were treated in the Clinical Center for Targeted Therapy. Molecular analysis was conducted in the MD Anderson Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory. Patients whose tumors had an aberration were treated with matched targeted therapy, when available. Treatment assignment was not randomized. The clinical outcomes of patients with molecular aberrations treated with matched targeted therapy were compared with those of consecutive patients who were not treated with matched targeted therapy.ResultsOf 1,144 patients analyzed, 460 (40.2%) had 1 or more aberration. In patients with 1 molecular aberration, matched therapy (n = 175) compared with treatment without matching (n = 116) was associated with a higher overall response rate (27% vs. 5%; P < 0.0001), longer time-to-treatment failure (TTF; median, 5.2 vs. 2.2 months; P < 0.0001), and longer survival (median, 13.4 vs. 9.0 months; P = 0.017). Matched targeted therapy was associated with longer TTF compared with their prior systemic therapy in patients with 1 mutation (5.2 vs. 3.1 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis in patients with 1 molecular aberration, matched therapy was an independent factor predicting response (P = 0.001) and TTF (P = 0.0001).ConclusionKeeping in mind that the study was not randomized and patients had diverse tumor types and a median of 5 prior therapies, our results suggest that identifying specific molecular abnormalities and choosing therapy based on these abnormalities is relevant in phase I clinical trials.
| S-EPMC4454458 | biostudies-literature